Re: 2.0.10 performance....

[Dan Fabulich <da...@fabulich.com>]

That has to be randomness in your test timings, assuming you didn't use 
the new command line arguments.  At best my changes should have no 
positive effect on performance. :-)

-Dan

Ralph Goers wrote:

> Well, I didn't really look at what you did, but I noticed that it did improve 
> my test times a little.
>
> Dan Fabulich wrote:
>> 
>> A lot of good discussion here.  Just as a reminder, my changes are one very 
>> small check-in, in code that shouldn't have changed since August 12. It 
>> should be easy to merge, or even to back out and reapply if for some reason 
>> that were necessary.
>> 
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=687388
>> 
>> I don't really have an opinion about 2.0.10/2.1.
>> 
>> -Dan
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>> 
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org