You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com> on 2009/09/06 23:51:47 UTC
Re: Eclipse plugin - getting ready to release
Its been a while since we've discussed this. I'm going to double check this
week that there aren't any issues with the binaries. Has anyone else found
any issues at all?
If not, I'll get a vote going soon.
Jon
On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've redone a test release, and hopefully corrected the issues that David
> has pointed out:
>
> Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~jgallimore/test2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgallimore/test2/>
> Tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/eclipse-plugins-1.0.0.alpha/
> Maven repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/openejb-001/
>
> Please do give it a go, shout if you have any problems or comments.
>
> Cheers
>
> Jon
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:21 PM, David Blevins <da...@visi.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 2, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>
>> That's definitely the easiest route. I'm going to redo the binaries with
>>> the
>>> LICENSE / NOTICE files in the jars, and add the missing license headers,
>>> probably tomorrow now - I'll change this at the same time. If we pop the
>>> video on the blog we can point out this change in the blog entry - what
>>> do
>>> you reckon?
>>>
>>
>> Works for me.
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:00 PM, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com
>>> >wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jul 2, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>
>>>> That's a good point, I'll add a JIRA and try and get that fixed.
>>>> Something
>>>>
>>>>> worth noting: the WTP plugin should work with any of the 3.x.x series
>>>>> of
>>>>> servers - it uses reflection to call the Deployer bean using whatever
>>>>> openejb-client-*.jar it can find in the OpenEJB home directory for the
>>>>> runtime, so although it says 3.0.0, it should work with 3.0.0 right up
>>>>> to
>>>>> the latest 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT versions of OpenEJB.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> So maybe we just list it as 'OpenEJB 3' instead of 'OpenEJB 3.0.0'?
>>>>
>>>> Or maybe we just leave it for now since the video is already done and
>>>> rename it in a future release.
>>>>
>>>> -David
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: Eclipse plugin - getting ready to release
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Sep 9, 2009, at 2:22 AM, Daniel S. Haischt wrote:
> Okay understood. I am sorry for getting your comment wrong. What you
> should understand is that I am currently writing a book which
> consumes most of my personal time [0]. Still I am trying to have an
> eye on the Eclipse plugin cause I think I may be able to provide
> valuable feedback based on my Eclipse experience.
Sweet! Congrats on the book! I've tried to do that (twice) and met
my match both times :)
> Anyway I'd go with what Noel J. Bergman once said on the incubator ML:
> Keep the degree of rhetoric stuff at a minimum and you are not at a
> risk that someone might get you wrong :)
Replace "rhetoric stuff" with "email of any kind" and truer words have
never been spoken.
Thanks for the time keeping up with the eclipse plugin!!
-David
Re: Eclipse plugin - getting ready to release
Posted by "Daniel S. Haischt" <da...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
Okay understood. I am sorry for getting your comment wrong. What you
should understand is that I am currently writing a book which
consumes most of my personal time [0]. Still I am trying to have an
eye on the Eclipse plugin cause I think I may be able to provide
valuable feedback based on my Eclipse experience.
Anyway I'd go with what Noel J. Bergman once said on the incubator ML:
Keep the degree of rhetoric stuff at a minimum and you are not at a
risk that someone might get you wrong :)
[0] http://www.amazon.de/Getting-Started-IBM-Websphere-Smash/dp/013701970X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books-intl-de&qid=1252488012&sr=8-1
Cheers
Daniel
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:04 AM, David Blevins<da...@visi.com> wrote:
> I was more making a comment on Jon's resisting the urge to make everything
> perfect. I have a hard time stopping myself all too often. Never seems to
> get any easier to put the pencil down and hand in the test. Especially when
> people start giving great feedback -- thanks for that btw.
>
> -David
>
> On Sep 9, 2009, at 12:52 AM, Daniel S. Haischt wrote:
>
>> You know I am just spending a few moments of my personal time on
>> giving the plugin a shot and hence I am taking notes if I stumble upon
>> something that doesn't seem to be reasonable that's all.
>>
>> Actually I don't care about what goes into alpha or beta.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:34 PM, David Blevins<da...@visi.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Great answer :)
>>>
>>> On Sep 8, 2009, at 5:12 AM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree on greying out the menu - would you object to this being added
>>>> to
>>>> 1.0.0.beta? ;-)
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: Eclipse plugin - getting ready to release
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hi Daniel,
I'm extremely grateful that you've taken the time to have a go with the
plugin and report back, and I think the feedback you've given is very
useful.
I'd prefer to do the alpha release of the plugin and then fix the issue
purely as doing as going through the release process is pretty time
consuming (and I never get it right first time, it usually takes 3 or 4
goes!) - but if there's any strong feelings I would of course be very happy
to fix the problem and spin another release, which is why I thought I'd ask.
If I need to do another release to sort the update site issue, then it would
make sense to sort this out too.
Thanks very much for giving the plugin a go.
Jon
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Daniel S. Haischt <
daniel.haischt@googlemail.com> wrote:
> You know I am just spending a few moments of my personal time on
> giving the plugin a shot and hence I am taking notes if I stumble upon
> something that doesn't seem to be reasonable that's all.
>
> Actually I don't care about what goes into alpha or beta.
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
>
Re: Eclipse plugin - getting ready to release
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
I was more making a comment on Jon's resisting the urge to make
everything perfect. I have a hard time stopping myself all too
often. Never seems to get any easier to put the pencil down and hand
in the test. Especially when people start giving great feedback --
thanks for that btw.
-David
On Sep 9, 2009, at 12:52 AM, Daniel S. Haischt wrote:
> You know I am just spending a few moments of my personal time on
> giving the plugin a shot and hence I am taking notes if I stumble upon
> something that doesn't seem to be reasonable that's all.
>
> Actually I don't care about what goes into alpha or beta.
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:34 PM, David
> Blevins<da...@visi.com> wrote:
>> Great answer :)
>>
>> On Sep 8, 2009, at 5:12 AM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>
>>> I agree on greying out the menu - would you object to this being
>>> added to
>>> 1.0.0.beta? ;-)
>>
>>
>
Re: Eclipse plugin - getting ready to release
Posted by "Daniel S. Haischt" <da...@googlemail.com>.
You know I am just spending a few moments of my personal time on
giving the plugin a shot and hence I am taking notes if I stumble upon
something that doesn't seem to be reasonable that's all.
Actually I don't care about what goes into alpha or beta.
Cheers
Daniel
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 11:34 PM, David Blevins<da...@visi.com> wrote:
> Great answer :)
>
> On Sep 8, 2009, at 5:12 AM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>
>> I agree on greying out the menu - would you object to this being added to
>> 1.0.0.beta? ;-)
>
>
Re: Eclipse plugin - getting ready to release
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
Great answer :)
On Sep 8, 2009, at 5:12 AM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> I agree on greying out the menu - would you object to this being
> added to
> 1.0.0.beta? ;-)
Re: Eclipse plugin - getting ready to release
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hi Daniel,
I forgot to mention previously that I had set up an update site here for the
release: http://people.apache.org/~jgallimore/test2/update-site/
The binaries are here: http://people.apache.org/~jgallimore/test2/
I've sucessfully got the pluign to install on Eclipse 3.3, 3.4 and 3.5 on
Ubuntu 9.04 (64 bit). The only issue I had was with Ganymede which
erroneously showed http://people.apache.org/~jgallimore/update-site. I'll
try and sort this out, and put up another update site and set of binaries.
I agree on greying out the menu - would you object to this being added to
1.0.0.beta? ;-)
Jon
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Daniel S. Haischt <
daniel.haischt@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> minor nitpick - you might as well consider to de-activate the
> 'generate annotations' drop-down menu item if the Eclipse workspace
> does not contain any projects.
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Jonathan
> Gallimore<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > Thanks for pointing these out, I'm going to have a look at these now. In
> > theory at least the plugin should work with Galileo (latest code works on
> my
> > machine, but that isn't installed from the update site) as well as
> Ganymede.
> > It might even work with Europa.
> >
> > I'm currently downloading a couple of versions of Eclipse, and I'm going
> to
> > give it a go - I'll post back how I get on. It looks like we definitely
> have
> > some issue with the plugin that p2 doesn't like - I'll see if I can get
> that
> > sorted.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Daniel S. Haischt <
> > daniel.haischt@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am getting the following error if trying to add the archived update
> >> site to a p2-based Eclipse Ganymede (3.4):
> >>
> >> No repositories found at http://www.openejb.org/updates/1.0
> >>
> >> I suspect the aforementioned URL does not exist or it does not contain
> >> an update site.
> >>
> >> Tho, after getting rid of the message box that contained the error
> >> message I got two update sites in the selection list of the p2 update
> >> manager.
> >>
> >> * the malicious http://www.openejb.org/updates/1.0
> >> * http://people.apache.org/~jgallimore/update-site<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgallimore/update-site>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgallimore/update-site>
> >>
> >> If I use the latter to install the plugin everything went smoothly.
> >> Tested on both Eclipse 3.4 & Eclipse 3.5. The latter did not work
> >> probably cause we don't support Galileo yet.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >> Daniel
> >>
> >> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Jonathan
> >> Gallimore<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Its been a while since we've discussed this. I'm going to double check
> >> this
> >> > week that there aren't any issues with the binaries. Has anyone else
> >> found
> >> > any issues at all?
> >> >
> >> > If not, I'll get a vote going soon.
> >> >
> >> > Jon
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> >> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I've redone a test release, and hopefully corrected the issues that
> >> David
> >> >> has pointed out:
> >> >>
> >> >> Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~jgallimore/test2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgallimore/test2/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgallimore/test2/>
> >> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgallimore/test2/>
> >> >> Tag:
> >> >>
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/eclipse-plugins-1.0.0.alpha/
> >> >> Maven repository:
> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/openejb-001/
> >> >>
> >> >> Please do give it a go, shout if you have any problems or comments.
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheers
> >> >>
> >> >> Jon
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:21 PM, David Blevins <
> david.blevins@visi.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Jul 2, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> That's definitely the easiest route. I'm going to redo the binaries
> >> with
> >> >>>> the
> >> >>>> LICENSE / NOTICE files in the jars, and add the missing license
> >> headers,
> >> >>>> probably tomorrow now - I'll change this at the same time. If we
> pop
> >> the
> >> >>>> video on the blog we can point out this change in the blog entry -
> >> what
> >> >>>> do
> >> >>>> you reckon?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Works for me.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -David
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> Jon
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:00 PM, David Blevins <
> >> david.blevins@visi.com
> >> >>>> >wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>> On Jul 2, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> That's a good point, I'll add a JIRA and try and get that fixed.
> >> >>>>> Something
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> worth noting: the WTP plugin should work with any of the 3.x.x
> >> series
> >> >>>>>> of
> >> >>>>>> servers - it uses reflection to call the Deployer bean using
> >> whatever
> >> >>>>>> openejb-client-*.jar it can find in the OpenEJB home directory
> for
> >> the
> >> >>>>>> runtime, so although it says 3.0.0, it should work with 3.0.0
> right
> >> up
> >> >>>>>> to
> >> >>>>>> the latest 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT versions of OpenEJB.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> So maybe we just list it as 'OpenEJB 3' instead of 'OpenEJB
> 3.0.0'?
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Or maybe we just leave it for now since the video is already done
> and
> >> >>>>> rename it in a future release.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> -David
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: Eclipse plugin - getting ready to release
Posted by "Daniel S. Haischt" <da...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
minor nitpick - you might as well consider to de-activate the
'generate annotations' drop-down menu item if the Eclipse workspace
does not contain any projects.
Cheers
Daniel
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Jonathan
Gallimore<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Thanks for pointing these out, I'm going to have a look at these now. In
> theory at least the plugin should work with Galileo (latest code works on my
> machine, but that isn't installed from the update site) as well as Ganymede.
> It might even work with Europa.
>
> I'm currently downloading a couple of versions of Eclipse, and I'm going to
> give it a go - I'll post back how I get on. It looks like we definitely have
> some issue with the plugin that p2 doesn't like - I'll see if I can get that
> sorted.
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Daniel S. Haischt <
> daniel.haischt@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am getting the following error if trying to add the archived update
>> site to a p2-based Eclipse Ganymede (3.4):
>>
>> No repositories found at http://www.openejb.org/updates/1.0
>>
>> I suspect the aforementioned URL does not exist or it does not contain
>> an update site.
>>
>> Tho, after getting rid of the message box that contained the error
>> message I got two update sites in the selection list of the p2 update
>> manager.
>>
>> * the malicious http://www.openejb.org/updates/1.0
>> * http://people.apache.org/~jgallimore/update-site<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgallimore/update-site>
>>
>> If I use the latter to install the plugin everything went smoothly.
>> Tested on both Eclipse 3.4 & Eclipse 3.5. The latter did not work
>> probably cause we don't support Galileo yet.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Daniel
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Jonathan
>> Gallimore<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Its been a while since we've discussed this. I'm going to double check
>> this
>> > week that there aren't any issues with the binaries. Has anyone else
>> found
>> > any issues at all?
>> >
>> > If not, I'll get a vote going soon.
>> >
>> > Jon
>> >
>> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
>> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I've redone a test release, and hopefully corrected the issues that
>> David
>> >> has pointed out:
>> >>
>> >> Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~jgallimore/test2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgallimore/test2/>
>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgallimore/test2/>
>> >> Tag:
>> >>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/eclipse-plugins-1.0.0.alpha/
>> >> Maven repository:
>> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/openejb-001/
>> >>
>> >> Please do give it a go, shout if you have any problems or comments.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >>
>> >> Jon
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:21 PM, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com
>> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Jul 2, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> That's definitely the easiest route. I'm going to redo the binaries
>> with
>> >>>> the
>> >>>> LICENSE / NOTICE files in the jars, and add the missing license
>> headers,
>> >>>> probably tomorrow now - I'll change this at the same time. If we pop
>> the
>> >>>> video on the blog we can point out this change in the blog entry -
>> what
>> >>>> do
>> >>>> you reckon?
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Works for me.
>> >>>
>> >>> -David
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> Jon
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:00 PM, David Blevins <
>> david.blevins@visi.com
>> >>>> >wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> On Jul 2, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> That's a good point, I'll add a JIRA and try and get that fixed.
>> >>>>> Something
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> worth noting: the WTP plugin should work with any of the 3.x.x
>> series
>> >>>>>> of
>> >>>>>> servers - it uses reflection to call the Deployer bean using
>> whatever
>> >>>>>> openejb-client-*.jar it can find in the OpenEJB home directory for
>> the
>> >>>>>> runtime, so although it says 3.0.0, it should work with 3.0.0 right
>> up
>> >>>>>> to
>> >>>>>> the latest 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT versions of OpenEJB.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> So maybe we just list it as 'OpenEJB 3' instead of 'OpenEJB 3.0.0'?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Or maybe we just leave it for now since the video is already done and
>> >>>>> rename it in a future release.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> -David
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>>
>
Re: Eclipse plugin - getting ready to release
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for pointing these out, I'm going to have a look at these now. In
theory at least the plugin should work with Galileo (latest code works on my
machine, but that isn't installed from the update site) as well as Ganymede.
It might even work with Europa.
I'm currently downloading a couple of versions of Eclipse, and I'm going to
give it a go - I'll post back how I get on. It looks like we definitely have
some issue with the plugin that p2 doesn't like - I'll see if I can get that
sorted.
Jon
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Daniel S. Haischt <
daniel.haischt@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am getting the following error if trying to add the archived update
> site to a p2-based Eclipse Ganymede (3.4):
>
> No repositories found at http://www.openejb.org/updates/1.0
>
> I suspect the aforementioned URL does not exist or it does not contain
> an update site.
>
> Tho, after getting rid of the message box that contained the error
> message I got two update sites in the selection list of the p2 update
> manager.
>
> * the malicious http://www.openejb.org/updates/1.0
> * http://people.apache.org/~jgallimore/update-site<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgallimore/update-site>
>
> If I use the latter to install the plugin everything went smoothly.
> Tested on both Eclipse 3.4 & Eclipse 3.5. The latter did not work
> probably cause we don't support Galileo yet.
>
> Cheers
> Daniel
>
> On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Jonathan
> Gallimore<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Its been a while since we've discussed this. I'm going to double check
> this
> > week that there aren't any issues with the binaries. Has anyone else
> found
> > any issues at all?
> >
> > If not, I'll get a vote going soon.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> > jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I've redone a test release, and hopefully corrected the issues that
> David
> >> has pointed out:
> >>
> >> Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~jgallimore/test2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgallimore/test2/>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgallimore/test2/>
> >> Tag:
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/eclipse-plugins-1.0.0.alpha/
> >> Maven repository:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/openejb-001/
> >>
> >> Please do give it a go, shout if you have any problems or comments.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Jon
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:21 PM, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Jul 2, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> >>>
> >>> That's definitely the easiest route. I'm going to redo the binaries
> with
> >>>> the
> >>>> LICENSE / NOTICE files in the jars, and add the missing license
> headers,
> >>>> probably tomorrow now - I'll change this at the same time. If we pop
> the
> >>>> video on the blog we can point out this change in the blog entry -
> what
> >>>> do
> >>>> you reckon?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Works for me.
> >>>
> >>> -David
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Jon
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:00 PM, David Blevins <
> david.blevins@visi.com
> >>>> >wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Jul 2, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That's a good point, I'll add a JIRA and try and get that fixed.
> >>>>> Something
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> worth noting: the WTP plugin should work with any of the 3.x.x
> series
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>>> servers - it uses reflection to call the Deployer bean using
> whatever
> >>>>>> openejb-client-*.jar it can find in the OpenEJB home directory for
> the
> >>>>>> runtime, so although it says 3.0.0, it should work with 3.0.0 right
> up
> >>>>>> to
> >>>>>> the latest 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT versions of OpenEJB.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> So maybe we just list it as 'OpenEJB 3' instead of 'OpenEJB 3.0.0'?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Or maybe we just leave it for now since the video is already done and
> >>>>> rename it in a future release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -David
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: Eclipse plugin - getting ready to release
Posted by "Daniel S. Haischt" <da...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
I am getting the following error if trying to add the archived update
site to a p2-based Eclipse Ganymede (3.4):
No repositories found at http://www.openejb.org/updates/1.0
I suspect the aforementioned URL does not exist or it does not contain
an update site.
Tho, after getting rid of the message box that contained the error
message I got two update sites in the selection list of the p2 update
manager.
* the malicious http://www.openejb.org/updates/1.0
* http://people.apache.org/~jgallimore/update-site
If I use the latter to install the plugin everything went smoothly.
Tested on both Eclipse 3.4 & Eclipse 3.5. The latter did not work
probably cause we don't support Galileo yet.
Cheers
Daniel
On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Jonathan
Gallimore<jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Its been a while since we've discussed this. I'm going to double check this
> week that there aren't any issues with the binaries. Has anyone else found
> any issues at all?
>
> If not, I'll get a vote going soon.
>
> Jon
>
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've redone a test release, and hopefully corrected the issues that David
>> has pointed out:
>>
>> Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~jgallimore/test2/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ejgallimore/test2/>
>> Tag:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/tags/eclipse-plugins-1.0.0.alpha/
>> Maven repository:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/openejb-001/
>>
>> Please do give it a go, shout if you have any problems or comments.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Jon
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:21 PM, David Blevins <da...@visi.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 2, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>
>>> That's definitely the easiest route. I'm going to redo the binaries with
>>>> the
>>>> LICENSE / NOTICE files in the jars, and add the missing license headers,
>>>> probably tomorrow now - I'll change this at the same time. If we pop the
>>>> video on the blog we can point out this change in the blog entry - what
>>>> do
>>>> you reckon?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Works for me.
>>>
>>> -David
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Jon
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 11:00 PM, David Blevins <david.blevins@visi.com
>>>> >wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 2, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That's a good point, I'll add a JIRA and try and get that fixed.
>>>>> Something
>>>>>
>>>>>> worth noting: the WTP plugin should work with any of the 3.x.x series
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> servers - it uses reflection to call the Deployer bean using whatever
>>>>>> openejb-client-*.jar it can find in the OpenEJB home directory for the
>>>>>> runtime, so although it says 3.0.0, it should work with 3.0.0 right up
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> the latest 3.1.2-SNAPSHOT versions of OpenEJB.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> So maybe we just list it as 'OpenEJB 3' instead of 'OpenEJB 3.0.0'?
>>>>>
>>>>> Or maybe we just leave it for now since the video is already done and
>>>>> rename it in a future release.
>>>>>
>>>>> -David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>