You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Abhishek Singh Chouhan (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/07/30 09:20:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HBASE-18476) HTable#put should call RS#mutate rather than RS#multi

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16106400#comment-16106400 ] 

Abhishek Singh Chouhan commented on HBASE-18476:
------------------------------------------------

Out of curosity, was there any particular reason of using the multi path rather than mutate?  In the current implementation calling a put would also flush any existing commits in BM for that table, is this something that was intended (changing to mutate would change this behavior)? 

> HTable#put should call RS#mutate rather than RS#multi
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-18476
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-18476
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Chia-Ping Tsai
>            Assignee: Chia-Ping Tsai
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 1.4.0, 1.5.0, 2.0.0-alpha-2
>
>
> The HBASE-18374 separates the metric for a single put and batched puts so the HTable#put shouldn't use the RS#mulit. It messes up the metrics.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)