RAT: can we release 0.10?

[sebb <se...@gmail.com>]

I think we need to release 0.10 sooner rather than later.

I think everything is ready.

Who wants to be RM?

Re: RAT: can we release 0.10?

[Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>]

On 07/23/13 21:32, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
> On 07/21/13 20:44, sebb wrote:
>> I think we need to release 0.10 sooner rather than later.
>
> +1
>
>> I think everything is ready.
>>
>> Who wants to be RM?
>
> If not one else wants to jump, I'll try to make up for last time...

Unless anyone jumps in soon, it looks like it's me :-)

Robert

Re: RAT: can we release 0.10?

[Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>]

On 07/21/13 20:44, sebb wrote:
> I think we need to release 0.10 sooner rather than later.

+1

> I think everything is ready.
>
> Who wants to be RM?

If not one else wants to jump, I'll try to make up for last time...

(This time I will try to explain what I'm doing and why, so other people 
can more easily have a go next time)

Robert

Re: RAT: can we release 0.10?

[Robert Burrell Donkin <ro...@blueyonder.co.uk>]

On 07/22/13 12:35, sebb wrote:
> On 22 July 2013 06:15, P. Ottlinger <po...@aiki-it.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 21.07.2013 21:44, schrieb sebb:
>>> I think we need to release 0.10 sooner rather than later.
>>
>> Did we release 0.9 properly?
>
> Dunno; probably too late now anyway.

Depends on what you mean by properly :-/

Officially, yes (the vote passed and the signed artefact was uploaded)

In terms of doing everything I usually do, then no

>> I didn't get any public announcement mail or something similar or is
>> that only done by bigger projects? But have graduated from Incubator
>> already ....

There was a long delay in getting the pub-sub mirrored distribution set 
up. I think we were unlucky in that we were one of the first to try to 
use this new system. Then I had a bad month or two health- and 
work-wise, with almost no typing time beyond my job.

When we discussed pushing onwards and issues a public announcement and 
so on, it seemed better to focus on getting an early 0.10 out...

>> What would be the 'big' differences between 0.9 and 0.10? Only the
>> performance problem while scanning licences and RAT-145?
>
> See https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/trunk/RELEASE_NOTES.txt

The main change is RAT-138 - Rat 0.9 could run much slower than 0.8 on 
some input.

Robert

Re: RAT: can we release 0.10?

[sebb <se...@gmail.com>]

On 22 July 2013 06:15, P. Ottlinger <po...@aiki-it.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 21.07.2013 21:44, schrieb sebb:
>> I think we need to release 0.10 sooner rather than later.
>
> Did we release 0.9 properly?

Dunno; probably too late now anyway.

> I didn't get any public announcement mail or something similar or is
> that only done by bigger projects? But have graduated from Incubator
> already ....
>
>
> What would be the 'big' differences between 0.9 and 0.10? Only the
> performance problem while scanning licences and RAT-145?

See https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/creadur/rat/trunk/RELEASE_NOTES.txt

> Cheers
> Phil
>

Re: RAT: can we release 0.10?

["P. Ottlinger" <po...@aiki-it.de>]

Hi,

Am 21.07.2013 21:44, schrieb sebb:
> I think we need to release 0.10 sooner rather than later.

Did we release 0.9 properly?

I didn't get any public announcement mail or something similar or is
that only done by bigger projects? But have graduated from Incubator
already ....


What would be the 'big' differences between 0.9 and 0.10? Only the
performance problem while scanning licences and RAT-145?

Cheers
Phil

Re: RAT: can we release 0.10?

["P. Ottlinger" <po...@aiki-it.de>]

Am 21.07.2013 21:44, schrieb sebb:
> I think we need to release 0.10 sooner rather than later.

+1

Let's do it :-)

Phil