You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to bugs@httpd.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2007/02/25 07:20:20 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41695] New: - mod_jk with httpd 2.0.58 on Solaris-10 11/06 dumping core
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695
Summary: mod_jk with httpd 2.0.58 on Solaris-10 11/06 dumping
core
Product: Apache httpd-2
Version: 2.0.58
Platform: Sun
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: Core
AssignedTo: bugs@httpd.apache.org
ReportedBy: mnikhil@gmail.com
CC: mnikhil@gmail.com
Hi,
I use httpdv2.0.58 on Solaris-10 11/06 release and when I use mod_jk v1.2.20, it
is dumping core.
When I look at the stacktrace of the core, here is what I get.
Command name abbreviations are allowed if unambiguous.
(gdb) bt
#0 0xfedabbfc in apr_table_get () from /usr/apache2/lib/libapr-0.so.0
#1 0xfe918f56 in jk_map_to_storage () from /usr/apache2/libexec/mod_jk.so
#2 0x0813e4e0 in ?? ()
#3 0x00000000 in ?? ()
(gdb)
Can someone please tell me if anyone has tried with httpdv2.0.58 and facing no
problems on Solaris-10 11/06 with mod_jkv1.2.20 ?
Thanks,
Nikhil
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41695] - mod_jk with httpd 2.0.58 on Solaris-10 11/06 dumping core
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695
------- Additional Comments From mnikhil@gmail.com 2007-02-25 13:50 -------
here is the full bt.
Reading symbols from /usr/apache2/libexec/mod_jk.so...
(no debugging symbols found)...done.
Loaded symbols for /usr/apache2/libexec/mod_jk.so
#0 0xfedabbfc in apr_table_get ()
from /usr/apache2/lib/libapr-0.so.0
(gdb) bt full
#0 0xfedabbfc in apr_table_get () from /usr/apache2/lib/libapr-0.so.0
No symbol table info available.
#1 0xfe918f56 in ?? () from /usr/apache2/libexec/mod_jk.so
No symbol table info available.
#2 0x00000000 in ?? ()
No symbol table info available.
(gdb)
I have not tried with self-compiled Apache-2.0.58. but I am not yet clear given
that why should there be a problem ?. Anyways, I will give a try with self-
compiled httpd-2.0.58 too. Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41695] - mod_jk with httpd 2.0.58 on Solaris-10 11/06 dumping core
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695
------- Additional Comments From rpluem@apache.org 2007-02-25 05:49 -------
*** Bug 41692 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41695] - mod_jk with httpd 2.0.58 on Solaris-10 11/06 dumping core
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695
jorton@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|bugs@httpd.apache.org |tomcat-
| |dev@jakarta.apache.org
Status|NEEDINFO |NEW
------- Additional Comments From jorton@redhat.com 2007-02-26 02:12 -------
[reassigned bug owner]
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41695] - mod_jk with httpd 2.0.58 on Solaris-10 11/06 dumping core
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695
rpluem@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |NEEDINFO
------- Additional Comments From rpluem@apache.org 2007-02-25 06:00 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
> Hi,
>
> I use httpdv2.0.58 on Solaris-10 11/06 release and when I use mod_jk v1.2.20, it
> is dumping core.
>
> When I look at the stacktrace of the core, here is what I get.
>
> Command name abbreviations are allowed if unambiguous.
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0xfedabbfc in apr_table_get () from /usr/apache2/lib/libapr-0.so.0
> #1 0xfe918f56 in jk_map_to_storage () from /usr/apache2/libexec/mod_jk.so
> #2 0x0813e4e0 in ?? ()
> #3 0x00000000 in ?? ()
Well this stacktrace does not look good to me. It should be much longer. Could
you please try the following:
1. Does this also happen if you use a self compiled apache 2.0.58?
2. Please ensure that the debugging information is stored in the binaries. For
gcc the according switch is -g (So you should do something like CFLAGS="-g -O2
-Wall" ./configure with gcc to get all this set). I do not know the correct
switch(es) for SunStudio-11.0.
3. Please issue a bt full instead of a bt in gdb.
4. For more details please have a look at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/debugging.html
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41695] - mod_jk with httpd 2.0.58 on Solaris-10 11/06 dumping core
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695
mnikhil@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Component|Core |Connectors
Product|Apache httpd-2 |Tomcat 3
Resolution|INVALID |
Version|2.0.58 |3.1 Final
------- Additional Comments From mnikhil@gmail.com 2007-02-25 03:02 -------
Thanks Nick. Refiling under tomcat. [I do not know what to be said with which
the Product version I have to chose ]
I am using the Sun provided apache2 under Solaris-10 11/06 release at
$ /usr/apache2/bin/httpd -v
Server version: Apache/2.0.58
Server built: Sep 5 2006 07:20:21
$ /usr/apache2/bin/httpd -V
Server version: Apache/2.0.58
Server built: Sep 5 2006 07:20:21
Server's Module Magic Number: 20020903:12
Server loaded: APR 0.9.12, APR-UTIL 0.9.12
Compiled using: APR 0.9.12, APR-UTIL 0.9.12
Architecture: 32-bit
Server compiled with....
-D APACHE_MPM_DIR="server/mpm/prefork"
-D APR_HAS_MMAP
-D APR_HAVE_IPV6 (IPv4-mapped addresses enabled)
-D APR_USE_FCNTL_SERIALIZE
-D APR_USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE
-D SINGLE_LISTEN_UNSERIALIZED_ACCEPT
-D APR_HAS_OTHER_CHILD
-D AP_HAVE_RELIABLE_PIPED_LOGS
-D HTTPD_ROOT="/usr/apache2"
-D SUEXEC_BIN="/usr/apache2/bin/suexec"
-D DEFAULT_PIDLOG="/var/run/apache2/httpd.pid"
-D DEFAULT_SCOREBOARD="logs/apache_runtime_status"
-D DEFAULT_LOCKFILE="/var/run/apache2/accept.lock"
-D DEFAULT_ERRORLOG="logs/error_log"
-D AP_TYPES_CONFIG_FILE="/etc/apache2/mime.types"
-D SERVER_CONFIG_FILE="/etc/apache2/httpd.conf"
I have got mod_jk 1.2.20 compiled myself with SunStudio-11.0
Please let me know for any other details if required.
Thanks,
Nikhil
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41695] - mod_jk with httpd 2.0.58 on Solaris-10 11/06 dumping core
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695
nick@webthing.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
------- Additional Comments From nick@webthing.com 2007-02-25 02:24 -------
mod_jk is not a part of Apache httpd. Please re-file tomcat. I expect they'll
want some more description, such as whether you compiled Apache and mod_jk
yourself (with details), or where you got them from.
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41695] - mod_jk with httpd 2.0.58 on Solaris-10 11/06 dumping core
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41695
rpluem@apache.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|Connectors |Native:JK
Product|Tomcat 3 |Tomcat 5
Version|3.1 Final |5.0.0
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: bugs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: bugs-help@httpd.apache.org