[vfs] Re: memory FS

[Mario Ivankovits <ma...@ops.co.at>]

Hello!
>Instead what we can do is implement Memory FS in c or other
>native language extremely coupled with OS and machine and build one common
>wrapper in java.
>  
If there is a user who uses JAVA, VFS and its RamFS and states the RamFS 
is too slow for its usage, we could talk about it.
Until this appens, I dont want to see native code within VFS.

Provide native code for all possible architectures is way too much work 
- at least this isnt work I would like to do and spend time for it.

­---
Mario

Re: [vfs] Re: memory FS

["B. K. Oxley (binkley)" <bi...@alumni.rice.edu>]

Mario Ivankovits wrote:
> If there is a user who uses JAVA, VFS and its RamFS and states the RamFS 
> is too slow for its usage, we could talk about it.
> Until this appens, I dont want to see native code within VFS.
> 
> Provide native code for all possible architectures is way too much work 
> - at least this isnt work I would like to do and spend time for it.

Actually... JDK 5 has a solution.  Look at ByteBuffer.  :-)  If you're 
desperate for native memory, allocate buffers natively.  It's not my cup 
of tea, but maybe it floats your boat.


Cheers,
--binkley

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org