You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Bojan Smojver <bo...@rexursive.com> on 2012/06/19 07:42:30 UTC

LimitRequestFieldSize: spurious note about max value?

Docs contain this note for LimitRequestFieldSize directive:

    <note>Under normal conditions, the value should not be changed from
    the default. Also, you can't set this higher than 8190 without
    modifying the source code and rebuilding.</note>

I was under the impression that the hardcoded upper limit was removed in
r149269. No?

-- 
Bojan

Re: LimitRequestFieldSize: spurious note about max value?

Posted by Bojan Smojver <bo...@rexursive.com>.
Stefan Fritsch <sf...@sfritsch.de> wrote:

>Fixed, thanks.

Thanks.

-- 
Bojan

Re: LimitRequestFieldSize: spurious note about max value?

Posted by Stefan Fritsch <sf...@sfritsch.de>.
On Friday 22 June 2012, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:42 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> > Docs contain this note for LimitRequestFieldSize directive:
> >     <note>Under normal conditions, the value should not be
> >     changed from the default. Also, you can't set this higher
> >     than 8190 without modifying the source code and
> >     rebuilding.</note>
> > 
> > I was under the impression that the hardcoded upper limit was
> > removed in r149269. No?
> 
> So, nobody will mind if I remove that comment from the docs then? I
> think I have commit there, although never really tried...

Fixed, thanks.

Re: LimitRequestFieldSize: spurious note about max value?

Posted by Bojan Smojver <bo...@rexursive.com>.
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:42 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Docs contain this note for LimitRequestFieldSize directive:
> 
>     <note>Under normal conditions, the value should not be changed from
>     the default. Also, you can't set this higher than 8190 without
>     modifying the source code and rebuilding.</note>
> 
> I was under the impression that the hardcoded upper limit was removed in
> r149269. No?

So, nobody will mind if I remove that comment from the docs then? I
think I have commit there, although never really tried...

-- 
Bojan