Merging auto-HA to branch-2

[Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>]

Hi folks,

We merged automatic failover (HDFS-3042) into trunk a couple weeks
back, and now I'd like to merge it into branch-2 for the next
2.0.x-alpha release. It's almost all new code so I don't think there
is any risk that it destabilizes things. Meanwhile, it's an important
feature that we should have in the 2.0 line.

If I don't hear any objections in the next day or two, I'll go ahead and merge.

Thanks
-Todd
-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: Merging auto-HA to branch-2

[lars hofhansl <lh...@yahoo.com>]

For what's it worth... +1 on behalf of Salesforce.com.



________________________________
 From: Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>
To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org 
Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2012 11:46 AM
Subject: Merging auto-HA to branch-2
 
Hi folks,

We merged automatic failover (HDFS-3042) into trunk a couple weeks
back, and now I'd like to merge it into branch-2 for the next
2.0.x-alpha release. It's almost all new code so I don't think there
is any risk that it destabilizes things. Meanwhile, it's an important
feature that we should have in the 2.0 line.

If I don't hear any objections in the next day or two, I'll go ahead and merge.

Thanks
-Todd
-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: Merging auto-HA to branch-2

[Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>]

OK, I've merged to branch-2 and updated the various CHANGES.txt references.

Thanks
-Todd

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hearing no objections, I'll merge this this afternoon.
>
> -Todd
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Eli Collins <el...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> +1    Thanks Todd
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> We merged automatic failover (HDFS-3042) into trunk a couple weeks
>>> back, and now I'd like to merge it into branch-2 for the next
>>> 2.0.x-alpha release. It's almost all new code so I don't think there
>>> is any risk that it destabilizes things. Meanwhile, it's an important
>>> feature that we should have in the 2.0 line.
>>>
>>> If I don't hear any objections in the next day or two, I'll go ahead and merge.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Todd
>>> --
>>> Todd Lipcon
>>> Software Engineer, Cloudera
>
>
>
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera



-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: Merging auto-HA to branch-2

[Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com>]

Hearing no objections, I'll merge this this afternoon.

-Todd

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Eli Collins <el...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> +1    Thanks Todd
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> We merged automatic failover (HDFS-3042) into trunk a couple weeks
>> back, and now I'd like to merge it into branch-2 for the next
>> 2.0.x-alpha release. It's almost all new code so I don't think there
>> is any risk that it destabilizes things. Meanwhile, it's an important
>> feature that we should have in the 2.0 line.
>>
>> If I don't hear any objections in the next day or two, I'll go ahead and merge.
>>
>> Thanks
>> -Todd
>> --
>> Todd Lipcon
>> Software Engineer, Cloudera



-- 
Todd Lipcon
Software Engineer, Cloudera

Re: Merging auto-HA to branch-2

[Eli Collins <el...@cloudera.com>]

+1    Thanks Todd

On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Todd Lipcon <to...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We merged automatic failover (HDFS-3042) into trunk a couple weeks
> back, and now I'd like to merge it into branch-2 for the next
> 2.0.x-alpha release. It's almost all new code so I don't think there
> is any risk that it destabilizes things. Meanwhile, it's an important
> feature that we should have in the 2.0 line.
>
> If I don't hear any objections in the next day or two, I'll go ahead and merge.
>
> Thanks
> -Todd
> --
> Todd Lipcon
> Software Engineer, Cloudera