You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Stephan Ewen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/02/12 00:53:18 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-3392) Unprotected access to elements in ClosableBlockingQueue#size()

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15143722#comment-15143722 ] 

Stephan Ewen commented on FLINK-3392:
-------------------------------------

I don't understand this issue. It is an access of a primitive field (a single atomic operation already), what would the locking change?

> Unprotected access to elements in ClosableBlockingQueue#size()
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-3392
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3392
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Here is related code:
> {code}
>   public int size() {
>     return elements.size();
>   }
> {code}
> Access to elements should be protected by lock.lock() / lock.unlock() pair.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)