You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> on 2015/05/17 09:18:45 UTC
board report is due!
Hi folks!
Our board report is due and I didn’t see any on the board list yet.
We did not report since october 2014, so this is really urgent to get done imo!
Thus I did move forward and tinkered the report.
Plz tweak as needed and Pinaki plz ship to the board tomorrow.
LieGrue,
strub
## Description:
Apache OpenJPA is a Java Persistence API 2.0 Implementation
## Activity:
* Maintenance is going on for JPA-2.0 parts.
* We had a few people asking for JPA-2.1 support
but did not start yet.
* Discussions about cleaning up the PCEnhancer and moving to ASM only
(currently we use 4 different bytecode libs in OpenJPA in parallel)
* We still get regular bug reports and even patches.
## Issues:
* The Project needs some healthy blood refresh.
* We are blocked with moving to JPA-2.1 by the outstanding TCK for EE7 issue
## PMC/Committership changes:
- Currently 29 committers and 12 PMC members in the project.
- No new changes to the PMC or committership since last report.
## Releases:
- Last release was 2.4.0 on 2015-04-22.
We still need to update the docs and upload the javadoc though.
## Mailing list activity:
- users@openjpa.apache.org:
- 247 subscribers (up 4 in the last 3 months):
- 73 emails sent to list (47 in previous quarter)
- dev@openjpa.apache.org:
- 133 subscribers (up 0 in the last 3 months):
- 182 emails sent to list (227 in previous quarter)
## JIRA activity:
- 18 JIRA tickets created in the last 3 months
- 18 JIRA tickets closed/resolved in the last 3 months
There are many 100 open tickets still. Many of them are not
relevant anymore. We need to do a cleanup of those.
Re: board report is due!
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
I’ve committed it now.
txs and LieGrue,
strub
> Am 18.05.2015 um 17:16 schrieb Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com>:
>
> We all have notes into Pinaki... If he doesn't respond soon, then I'm good
> with the report. Thanks.
>
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Kevin!
>> Should I go on and commit the report?
>> Usually this is something the chair needs to do…
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>> Am 18.05.2015 um 14:52 schrieb Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> Mark,
>>> I thought Rick had posted this already, but you were added to the OpenJPA
>>> PMC this past month. :-) So, we can update the board report with that
>>> good news. Congratulations!
>>>
>>> Kevin
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I wouldnt say blocked for tcks but worried. We ll release anyway IMO
>>>> Le 17 mai 2015 09:18, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Our board report is due and I didn’t see any on the board list yet.
>>>>> We did not report since october 2014, so this is really urgent to get
>>>> done
>>>>> imo!
>>>>> Thus I did move forward and tinkered the report.
>>>>> Plz tweak as needed and Pinaki plz ship to the board tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>> strub
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ## Description:
>>>>> Apache OpenJPA is a Java Persistence API 2.0 Implementation
>>>>>
>>>>> ## Activity:
>>>>> * Maintenance is going on for JPA-2.0 parts.
>>>>> * We had a few people asking for JPA-2.1 support
>>>>> but did not start yet.
>>>>> * Discussions about cleaning up the PCEnhancer and moving to ASM only
>>>>> (currently we use 4 different bytecode libs in OpenJPA in parallel)
>>>>> * We still get regular bug reports and even patches.
>>>>>
>>>>> ## Issues:
>>>>> * The Project needs some healthy blood refresh.
>>>>> * We are blocked with moving to JPA-2.1 by the outstanding TCK for EE7
>>>>> issue
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ## PMC/Committership changes:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Currently 29 committers and 12 PMC members in the project.
>>>>> - No new changes to the PMC or committership since last report.
>>>>>
>>>>> ## Releases:
>>>>>
>>>>> - Last release was 2.4.0 on 2015-04-22.
>>>>> We still need to update the docs and upload the javadoc though.
>>>>>
>>>>> ## Mailing list activity:
>>>>>
>>>>> - users@openjpa.apache.org:
>>>>> - 247 subscribers (up 4 in the last 3 months):
>>>>> - 73 emails sent to list (47 in previous quarter)
>>>>>
>>>>> - dev@openjpa.apache.org:
>>>>> - 133 subscribers (up 0 in the last 3 months):
>>>>> - 182 emails sent to list (227 in previous quarter)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ## JIRA activity:
>>>>>
>>>>> - 18 JIRA tickets created in the last 3 months
>>>>> - 18 JIRA tickets closed/resolved in the last 3 months
>>>>> There are many 100 open tickets still. Many of them are not
>>>>> relevant anymore. We need to do a cleanup of those.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: board report is due!
Posted by Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com>.
We all have notes into Pinaki... If he doesn't respond soon, then I'm good
with the report. Thanks.
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Thanks Kevin!
> Should I go on and commit the report?
> Usually this is something the chair needs to do…
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 18.05.2015 um 14:52 schrieb Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Mark,
> > I thought Rick had posted this already, but you were added to the OpenJPA
> > PMC this past month. :-) So, we can update the board report with that
> > good news. Congratulations!
> >
> > Kevin
> >
> > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I wouldnt say blocked for tcks but worried. We ll release anyway IMO
> >> Le 17 mai 2015 09:18, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
> >>
> >>> Hi folks!
> >>>
> >>> Our board report is due and I didn’t see any on the board list yet.
> >>> We did not report since october 2014, so this is really urgent to get
> >> done
> >>> imo!
> >>> Thus I did move forward and tinkered the report.
> >>> Plz tweak as needed and Pinaki plz ship to the board tomorrow.
> >>>
> >>> LieGrue,
> >>> strub
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ## Description:
> >>> Apache OpenJPA is a Java Persistence API 2.0 Implementation
> >>>
> >>> ## Activity:
> >>> * Maintenance is going on for JPA-2.0 parts.
> >>> * We had a few people asking for JPA-2.1 support
> >>> but did not start yet.
> >>> * Discussions about cleaning up the PCEnhancer and moving to ASM only
> >>> (currently we use 4 different bytecode libs in OpenJPA in parallel)
> >>> * We still get regular bug reports and even patches.
> >>>
> >>> ## Issues:
> >>> * The Project needs some healthy blood refresh.
> >>> * We are blocked with moving to JPA-2.1 by the outstanding TCK for EE7
> >>> issue
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ## PMC/Committership changes:
> >>>
> >>> - Currently 29 committers and 12 PMC members in the project.
> >>> - No new changes to the PMC or committership since last report.
> >>>
> >>> ## Releases:
> >>>
> >>> - Last release was 2.4.0 on 2015-04-22.
> >>> We still need to update the docs and upload the javadoc though.
> >>>
> >>> ## Mailing list activity:
> >>>
> >>> - users@openjpa.apache.org:
> >>> - 247 subscribers (up 4 in the last 3 months):
> >>> - 73 emails sent to list (47 in previous quarter)
> >>>
> >>> - dev@openjpa.apache.org:
> >>> - 133 subscribers (up 0 in the last 3 months):
> >>> - 182 emails sent to list (227 in previous quarter)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ## JIRA activity:
> >>>
> >>> - 18 JIRA tickets created in the last 3 months
> >>> - 18 JIRA tickets closed/resolved in the last 3 months
> >>> There are many 100 open tickets still. Many of them are not
> >>> relevant anymore. We need to do a cleanup of those.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: board report is due!
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Thanks Kevin!
Should I go on and commit the report?
Usually this is something the chair needs to do…
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 18.05.2015 um 14:52 schrieb Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com>:
>
> Mark,
> I thought Rick had posted this already, but you were added to the OpenJPA
> PMC this past month. :-) So, we can update the board report with that
> good news. Congratulations!
>
> Kevin
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I wouldnt say blocked for tcks but worried. We ll release anyway IMO
>> Le 17 mai 2015 09:18, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
>>
>>> Hi folks!
>>>
>>> Our board report is due and I didn’t see any on the board list yet.
>>> We did not report since october 2014, so this is really urgent to get
>> done
>>> imo!
>>> Thus I did move forward and tinkered the report.
>>> Plz tweak as needed and Pinaki plz ship to the board tomorrow.
>>>
>>> LieGrue,
>>> strub
>>>
>>>
>>> ## Description:
>>> Apache OpenJPA is a Java Persistence API 2.0 Implementation
>>>
>>> ## Activity:
>>> * Maintenance is going on for JPA-2.0 parts.
>>> * We had a few people asking for JPA-2.1 support
>>> but did not start yet.
>>> * Discussions about cleaning up the PCEnhancer and moving to ASM only
>>> (currently we use 4 different bytecode libs in OpenJPA in parallel)
>>> * We still get regular bug reports and even patches.
>>>
>>> ## Issues:
>>> * The Project needs some healthy blood refresh.
>>> * We are blocked with moving to JPA-2.1 by the outstanding TCK for EE7
>>> issue
>>>
>>>
>>> ## PMC/Committership changes:
>>>
>>> - Currently 29 committers and 12 PMC members in the project.
>>> - No new changes to the PMC or committership since last report.
>>>
>>> ## Releases:
>>>
>>> - Last release was 2.4.0 on 2015-04-22.
>>> We still need to update the docs and upload the javadoc though.
>>>
>>> ## Mailing list activity:
>>>
>>> - users@openjpa.apache.org:
>>> - 247 subscribers (up 4 in the last 3 months):
>>> - 73 emails sent to list (47 in previous quarter)
>>>
>>> - dev@openjpa.apache.org:
>>> - 133 subscribers (up 0 in the last 3 months):
>>> - 182 emails sent to list (227 in previous quarter)
>>>
>>>
>>> ## JIRA activity:
>>>
>>> - 18 JIRA tickets created in the last 3 months
>>> - 18 JIRA tickets closed/resolved in the last 3 months
>>> There are many 100 open tickets still. Many of them are not
>>> relevant anymore. We need to do a cleanup of those.
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: board report is due!
Posted by Kevin Sutter <kw...@gmail.com>.
Mark,
I thought Rick had posted this already, but you were added to the OpenJPA
PMC this past month. :-) So, we can update the board report with that
good news. Congratulations!
Kevin
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 3:11 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wouldnt say blocked for tcks but worried. We ll release anyway IMO
> Le 17 mai 2015 09:18, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
>
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > Our board report is due and I didn’t see any on the board list yet.
> > We did not report since october 2014, so this is really urgent to get
> done
> > imo!
> > Thus I did move forward and tinkered the report.
> > Plz tweak as needed and Pinaki plz ship to the board tomorrow.
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > ## Description:
> > Apache OpenJPA is a Java Persistence API 2.0 Implementation
> >
> > ## Activity:
> > * Maintenance is going on for JPA-2.0 parts.
> > * We had a few people asking for JPA-2.1 support
> > but did not start yet.
> > * Discussions about cleaning up the PCEnhancer and moving to ASM only
> > (currently we use 4 different bytecode libs in OpenJPA in parallel)
> > * We still get regular bug reports and even patches.
> >
> > ## Issues:
> > * The Project needs some healthy blood refresh.
> > * We are blocked with moving to JPA-2.1 by the outstanding TCK for EE7
> > issue
> >
> >
> > ## PMC/Committership changes:
> >
> > - Currently 29 committers and 12 PMC members in the project.
> > - No new changes to the PMC or committership since last report.
> >
> > ## Releases:
> >
> > - Last release was 2.4.0 on 2015-04-22.
> > We still need to update the docs and upload the javadoc though.
> >
> > ## Mailing list activity:
> >
> > - users@openjpa.apache.org:
> > - 247 subscribers (up 4 in the last 3 months):
> > - 73 emails sent to list (47 in previous quarter)
> >
> > - dev@openjpa.apache.org:
> > - 133 subscribers (up 0 in the last 3 months):
> > - 182 emails sent to list (227 in previous quarter)
> >
> >
> > ## JIRA activity:
> >
> > - 18 JIRA tickets created in the last 3 months
> > - 18 JIRA tickets closed/resolved in the last 3 months
> > There are many 100 open tickets still. Many of them are not
> > relevant anymore. We need to do a cleanup of those.
> >
> >
>
Re: board report is due!
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
Hi
I wouldnt say blocked for tcks but worried. We ll release anyway IMO
Le 17 mai 2015 09:18, "Mark Struberg" <st...@yahoo.de> a écrit :
> Hi folks!
>
> Our board report is due and I didn’t see any on the board list yet.
> We did not report since october 2014, so this is really urgent to get done
> imo!
> Thus I did move forward and tinkered the report.
> Plz tweak as needed and Pinaki plz ship to the board tomorrow.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> ## Description:
> Apache OpenJPA is a Java Persistence API 2.0 Implementation
>
> ## Activity:
> * Maintenance is going on for JPA-2.0 parts.
> * We had a few people asking for JPA-2.1 support
> but did not start yet.
> * Discussions about cleaning up the PCEnhancer and moving to ASM only
> (currently we use 4 different bytecode libs in OpenJPA in parallel)
> * We still get regular bug reports and even patches.
>
> ## Issues:
> * The Project needs some healthy blood refresh.
> * We are blocked with moving to JPA-2.1 by the outstanding TCK for EE7
> issue
>
>
> ## PMC/Committership changes:
>
> - Currently 29 committers and 12 PMC members in the project.
> - No new changes to the PMC or committership since last report.
>
> ## Releases:
>
> - Last release was 2.4.0 on 2015-04-22.
> We still need to update the docs and upload the javadoc though.
>
> ## Mailing list activity:
>
> - users@openjpa.apache.org:
> - 247 subscribers (up 4 in the last 3 months):
> - 73 emails sent to list (47 in previous quarter)
>
> - dev@openjpa.apache.org:
> - 133 subscribers (up 0 in the last 3 months):
> - 182 emails sent to list (227 in previous quarter)
>
>
> ## JIRA activity:
>
> - 18 JIRA tickets created in the last 3 months
> - 18 JIRA tickets closed/resolved in the last 3 months
> There are many 100 open tickets still. Many of them are not
> relevant anymore. We need to do a cleanup of those.
>
>