You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2005/05/22 13:20:52 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34193] -
[PATCH] Performance improvement to DisjunctionSumScorer
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34193>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34193
------- Additional Comments From paul.elschot@xs4all.nl 2005-05-22 13:20 -------
Created an attachment (id=15117)
--> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15117&action=view)
Another alternative to BooleanScorer using a Btree
As posted today on java-dev by Karl Wright.
The performance of the unbalanced btree could be compared
to the specialised priority queue.
The code can also be simplified to the disjunction case,
which boils down to adapting from 1.4.3 to the trunk.
Regards,
Paul Elschot
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org