You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@drill.apache.org by "Mehant Baid (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/04/19 23:35:58 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (DRILL-2823) Merge join should use implicit cast

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14502147#comment-14502147 ] 

Mehant Baid commented on DRILL-2823:
------------------------------------

https://reviews.apache.org/r/33343/
[~amansinha100] can you please review

> Merge join should use implicit cast
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DRILL-2823
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DRILL-2823
>             Project: Apache Drill
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Mehant Baid
>            Assignee: Mehant Baid
>             Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>         Attachments: DRILL-2823.patch
>
>
> Currently merge join does not use implicit cast if the two expressions in the join condition are of different data types. However if we have such a situation it works as expected because we have function implementations for numeric comparisons with different data types. As part of DRILL-2753 we are getting rid of it so merge join will need to use implicit cast if the expressions in the join condition are of different types.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)