You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@isis.apache.org by "Dan Haywood (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/12/22 00:42:46 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (ISIS-1228) Introduce nextTransaction() into
fixture scripts.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1228?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Dan Haywood updated ISIS-1228:
------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.11.0)
1.12.0
> Introduce nextTransaction() into fixture scripts.
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISIS-1228
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ISIS-1228
> Project: Isis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: core-1.8.0
> Reporter: Dan Haywood
> Assignee: Dan Haywood
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.12.0
>
>
> originally raised by Oscar:
> When using FixtureScripts, there can be many actions that, on the real world, are execute in different time contexts.
> For example, a user creates an Account on the webapp and after that executes different actions.
> That’s relevant if using the queryResultsCache service (or the new planned “@Action” annotation extension) because the results previously created (i.e., the Account) might be available on the cache.
> So perhaps some mechanism like the nextTransation() method might be also introduced on FixtureScripts.
> What do you think?
> ~~~~~~~
> Dan's reply:
> Makes sense.
> There is a nextTransaction() method in the AbstractIntegTest class, you could see how that is implemented and see if it can be adapted?
> Or, another idea is that the framework could run each FixtureScript automatically in a separate transaction; that would be a better simulation of a sequence of user interactions?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)