You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sqoop.apache.org by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org> on 2014/01/25 18:28:41 UTC
Software grant for OraOop was [VOTE] Include High Performance Oracle
Connector in Sqoop
> I am unsure why a vote is required for a code contribution - really
> just having it attached to a jira, and a committer pushing it should be
> enough. Either way, a big +1!
That is an excellent point Hari, thank you for raising it! Considering that OraOop has been released several times by Quest and later by Dell, I do not believe that David owns the rights. And as a result I don't think that he can simply submit the connector as a patch on JIRA and grant us required rights. It seems that much better way is for Dell to submit a Software Grant [1] first, ensuring that we have the legal part covered.
Jarcec
Links:
1: http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 09:21:13PM -0800, Venkat Ranganathan wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks
> Venkat
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Abhijeet Gaikwad <ab...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Abhijeet
> >
> >
> > On 1/24/2014 6:18 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> >
> >> +1!
> >>
> >> Jarcec
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 04:06:10PM -0800, Kathleen Ting wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> Thanks David and Jarcec! The OraOop Connector will be a momentous
> >>> addition to the Apache Sqoop codebase.
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Hari Shreedharan
> >>> <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> +1.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am unsure why a vote is required for a code contribution - really
> >>>> just having it attached to a jira, and a committer pushing it should be
> >>>> enough. Either way, a big +1!
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Hari
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 3:38 PM, David Robson wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Based on the recent discussion this is a vote thread to determine if
> >>>>> we should include the Oracle connector into the core Sqoop code. I will be
> >>>>> doing the bulk of the work to migrate it into the Sqoop codebase - and
> >>>>> Jarcec has said he will assist me where required.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please vote
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [] +1 Yes - Oracle connector code should be moved into Sqoop code
> >>>>> [] +0 Abstain - I don't have a preference
> >>>>> [] -1 No - Oracle connector should remain separate from Sqoop
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Software grant for OraOop Oracle Connector in Sqoop
Posted by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>.
Hi David,
it seems that there were no objections with using the software grant to contribute the OraOop. Would you mind following up with your employer to fill and submit the agreement? The procedure is documented at [1].
Jarcec
Links:
1: http://www.apache.org/licenses/#grants
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 09:28:41AM -0800, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> > I am unsure why a vote is required for a code contribution - really
> > just having it attached to a jira, and a committer pushing it should be
> > enough. Either way, a big +1!
>
> That is an excellent point Hari, thank you for raising it! Considering that OraOop has been released several times by Quest and later by Dell, I do not believe that David owns the rights. And as a result I don't think that he can simply submit the connector as a patch on JIRA and grant us required rights. It seems that much better way is for Dell to submit a Software Grant [1] first, ensuring that we have the legal part covered.
>
> Jarcec
>
> Links:
> 1: http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 09:21:13PM -0800, Venkat Ranganathan wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks
> > Venkat
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Abhijeet Gaikwad <ab...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Best Regards,
> > > Abhijeet
> > >
> > >
> > > On 1/24/2014 6:18 PM, Jarek Jarcec Cecho wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1!
> > >>
> > >> Jarcec
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 04:06:10PM -0800, Kathleen Ting wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks David and Jarcec! The OraOop Connector will be a momentous
> > >>> addition to the Apache Sqoop codebase.
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Hari Shreedharan
> > >>> <hs...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> +1.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I am unsure why a vote is required for a code contribution - really
> > >>>> just having it attached to a jira, and a committer pushing it should be
> > >>>> enough. Either way, a big +1!
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks,
> > >>>> Hari
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Friday, January 24, 2014 at 3:38 PM, David Robson wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Based on the recent discussion this is a vote thread to determine if
> > >>>>> we should include the Oracle connector into the core Sqoop code. I will be
> > >>>>> doing the bulk of the work to migrate it into the Sqoop codebase - and
> > >>>>> Jarcec has said he will assist me where required.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Please vote
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> [] +1 Yes - Oracle connector code should be moved into Sqoop code
> > >>>>> [] +0 Abstain - I don't have a preference
> > >>>>> [] -1 No - Oracle connector should remain separate from Sqoop
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.