You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beehive.apache.org by Eddie O'Neil <ek...@bea.com> on 2005/02/17 05:02:32 UTC

adding "beehive" to the JAR names

All--

   I'd like to suggest that we add "beehive" as a prefix to the names of 
all of the JARs that we produce.  Today, this would affect controls and 
WSM directly -- NetUI is already doing this at least for JARs shipped in 
the distribution.

   Any thoughts on this?

Eddie

RE: adding "beehive" to the JAR names

Posted by John Murray <jo...@sobetech.com>.
+1

I would be in favor is isolating jars not only by name but also directory
structure.

-----Original Message-----
From: Eddie O'Neil [mailto:ekoneil@bea.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:31 PM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: Re: adding "beehive" to the JAR names



   Yeah, agreed about the urgency of doing it soon.  :)



Kyle Marvin wrote:
> This feels right to me... it should be possible to look at a
> Beehive-based app and identify the jars that are actually related to
> the Beehive runtime (vs those for struts, axis, other functions, etc).
>
> If we are going to do this, it seems like it needs to be soon.
>
> -- Kyle
>
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:02:32 -0700, Eddie O'Neil <ek...@bea.com> wrote:
>
>>All--
>>
>>   I'd like to suggest that we add "beehive" as a prefix to the names of
>>all of the JARs that we produce.  Today, this would affect controls and
>>WSM directly -- NetUI is already doing this at least for JARs shipped in
>>the distribution.
>>
>>   Any thoughts on this?
>>
>>Eddie
>>
>
>

Re: adding "beehive" to the JAR names

Posted by Eddie O'Neil <ek...@bea.com>.
   Yeah, agreed about the urgency of doing it soon.  :)



Kyle Marvin wrote:
> This feels right to me... it should be possible to look at a
> Beehive-based app and identify the jars that are actually related to
> the Beehive runtime (vs those for struts, axis, other functions, etc).
> 
> If we are going to do this, it seems like it needs to be soon.
> 
> -- Kyle
> 
> On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:02:32 -0700, Eddie O'Neil <ek...@bea.com> wrote:
> 
>>All--
>>
>>   I'd like to suggest that we add "beehive" as a prefix to the names of
>>all of the JARs that we produce.  Today, this would affect controls and
>>WSM directly -- NetUI is already doing this at least for JARs shipped in
>>the distribution.
>>
>>   Any thoughts on this?
>>
>>Eddie
>>
> 
>

Re: adding "beehive" to the JAR names

Posted by Kyle Marvin <ky...@gmail.com>.
This feels right to me... it should be possible to look at a
Beehive-based app and identify the jars that are actually related to
the Beehive runtime (vs those for struts, axis, other functions, etc).

If we are going to do this, it seems like it needs to be soon.

-- Kyle

On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:02:32 -0700, Eddie O'Neil <ek...@bea.com> wrote:
> All--
> 
>    I'd like to suggest that we add "beehive" as a prefix to the names of
> all of the JARs that we produce.  Today, this would affect controls and
> WSM directly -- NetUI is already doing this at least for JARs shipped in
> the distribution.
> 
>    Any thoughts on this?
> 
> Eddie
>