[NOTICE] Intent to T&R httpd 2.3.14

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

Just a heads up that my plan is to T&R httpd 2.3.14 later on
this week (like Thursday), now that the LDAP issues have been
reverted.

Let's polish up trunk and rebuild the momentum to 2.4.0!

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R httpd 2.3.14

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

This is gonna happen by COB today…

On Jul 30, 2011, at 7:50 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:

> I did some test builds for r1151214 on Solaris 10 Sparc:
> 
> - Building against APR trunk with "reallyall" failed because of missing
> ldap support in apr trunk. Building against with "all" and disabled ldap
> works
> 
> - For static builds it seems mod_watchdog and mod_proxy_fdpass are still
> build as dynamic modules. Furthermore I get a link error of
> mod_heartbeat against mod_watchdog (I haven't checked it yet, but I
> guess it tries to link against the non-existing static mod_watchdog). It
> could be, that the link problem only happens for "all".
> 
> Both things don't seem to be show stoppers.
> 
> Testing didn't go well for static builds, because of the link problem
> the install didn't go through. Testing for dynamic builds looks good
> except for "reallyall", because then mod_privileges gets build and then
> the tests with threaded MPMS and also with cgi fail, but that's expected.
> 
> Overall it looks good!
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Rainer
> 

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R httpd 2.3.14

[Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>]

I did some test builds for r1151214 on Solaris 10 Sparc:

- Building against APR trunk with "reallyall" failed because of missing
ldap support in apr trunk. Building against with "all" and disabled ldap
works

- For static builds it seems mod_watchdog and mod_proxy_fdpass are still
build as dynamic modules. Furthermore I get a link error of
mod_heartbeat against mod_watchdog (I haven't checked it yet, but I
guess it tries to link against the non-existing static mod_watchdog). It
could be, that the link problem only happens for "all".

Both things don't seem to be show stoppers.

Testing didn't go well for static builds, because of the link problem
the install didn't go through. Testing for dynamic builds looks good
except for "reallyall", because then mod_privileges gets build and then
the tests with threaded MPMS and also with cgi fail, but that's expected.

Overall it looks good!

Regards,

Rainer

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R httpd 2.3.14

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

That's the reason for the NOTICE email... so people
know to test beforehand.

On Jul 25, 2011, at 11:03 AM, Steffen wrote:

> Reported Windows issue fixed ?
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Jagielski" <ji...@jaguNET.com>
> To: <de...@httpd.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 4:49 PM
> Subject: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R httpd 2.3.14
> 
> 
>> Just a heads up that my plan is to T&R httpd 2.3.14 later on
>> this week (like Thursday), now that the LDAP issues have been
>> reverted.
>> Let's polish up trunk and rebuild the momentum to 2.4.0!
>> 
> 

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R httpd 2.3.14

["Gregg L. Smith" <gl...@gknw.net>]

No, but this is not a regression from any prior version (AcceptFilter 
issue), I just tested on 2.3.5 and the issue is there. I don't see this 
as holding up another Beta should folks want one. It surely needs to 
addressed asap before GA.

Gregg

On 7/25/2011 8:03 AM, Steffen wrote:
> Reported Windows issue fixed ?
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jim Jagielski" <ji...@jaguNET.com>
> To: <de...@httpd.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 4:49 PM
> Subject: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R httpd 2.3.14
>
>
>> Just a heads up that my plan is to T&R httpd 2.3.14 later on
>> this week (like Thursday), now that the LDAP issues have been
>> reverted.
>>
>> Let's polish up trunk and rebuild the momentum to 2.4.0!
>>
>

Re: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R httpd 2.3.14

[Steffen <in...@apachelounge.com>]

Reported Windows issue fixed ?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jim Jagielski" <ji...@jaguNET.com>
To: <de...@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 4:49 PM
Subject: [NOTICE] Intent to T&R httpd 2.3.14


> Just a heads up that my plan is to T&R httpd 2.3.14 later on
> this week (like Thursday), now that the LDAP issues have been
> reverted.
> 
> Let's polish up trunk and rebuild the momentum to 2.4.0!
>