You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@jackrabbit.apache.org by Shailesh Mangal <sh...@getzephyr.com> on 2009/02/05 19:43:25 UTC

is it ok to remove derby dependency?

We use mysql for persistance. Is it ok to exclude derby dependency  
from our pom.xml.?

		<dependency>
			<groupId>org.apache.jackrabbit</groupId>
			<artifactId>jackrabbit-core</artifactId>
			<version>${jackrabbit.version}</version>
			<exclusions>
				<exclusion>
					<groupId>poi</groupId>
					<artifactId>poi</artifactId>
				</exclusion>
				<exclusion>
					<groupId>org.apache.derby</groupId>
					<artifactId>derby</artifactId>
				</exclusion>
			</exclusions>
		</dependency>

-Shailesh

Re: is it ok to remove derby dependency?

Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.

Hi,

On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 7:43 PM, Shailesh Mangal
<sh...@getzephyr.com> wrote:
> We use mysql for persistance. Is it ok to exclude derby dependency from our
> pom.xml.?

Yes. Just make sure that all your workspaces and the version store use
a non-default persistence manager (mysql in your case).

BR,

Jukka Zitting