You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openmeetings.apache.org by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> on 2016/02/11 07:35:54 UTC
[DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Hello All,
GSOC 2016 is coming :)
In case we would like to benefit from it we need to record GSOC ideas for
our project
I would like to propose to discuss current list [1] and any additional
ideas in this thread
Looking forward for you comments :)
[1]
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-554?filter=12334770&jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2016
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Aw: Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by BBS Technik <do...@gmx.de>.
Hi Maxim,
OpenMeetings is a realy great tool and I use it every day. :-))
But there are still the key features for a videoconferencing tool waiting for improvement.
1. The need to improve the screen sharing function and performance (better compression algorithms for larger screen clippings, transmission of a particular application window, significant reduction of bandwidth, stability, ...).
2. The implementation of adaptiv consumtion of bandwith for the videostreaming depending on the total bandwith.
3. Flashfree conference rooms.
4. Mobil client with whiteboard function.
I know, this points are realy hard to improve but improvements are needed.
But there could also be smaller improvements in a
consistent and modern, flexible and more attractive gui
or
to bring the clipboard content of the os to the whiteboard of om (so you can substitute the screen sharing in some usecases).
Cobrowsing could also help to have a better overall impression.
On the administrative side for more acceptance we need
an consistent and automated install process from scratch
and
an one command or one-click update process.
I think, we have enough possibilities to have more than one GSoC project.
Best regards
Ed
Gesendet: Samstag, 27. Februar 2016 um 13:06 Uhr
Von: "Maxim Solodovnik" <so...@gmail.com>
An: dev <de...@openmeetings.apache.org>, "Openmeetings user-list" <us...@openmeetings.apache.org>
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Am I right thinking no activity on the topic means, there are no areas of improvement in OpenMeetings?
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello All,
GSOC 2016 is coming :)
In case we would like to benefit from it we need to record GSOC ideas for our project
I would like to propose to discuss current list [1] and any additional ideas in this thread
Looking forward for you comments :)
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-554?filter=12334770&jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2016[https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-554?filter=12334770&jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2016]
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for your answers!
I'll try to sum everything up here:
@Dmitriy
I believe you are talking about audio/video decentralization, OM DB will be
stored on central server so everything can be configured in one place, as
well as authentication need to be performed on the server.
Could you please create JIRA issue and describe your idea more detailed?
@Ed
1. *The need to improve the screen sharing function and performance *
We do have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-112, not much
interest from students since 2012 :(((, right now we have 1 students
response, will see ...
2. *The implementation of adaptiv consumtion of bandwith for the
videostreaming depending on the total bandwith. *
could you please provide more details on this? currently user select
his/her video resolution and can save bandwidth decreasing video size,
moderator can deny video to users to save bandwidth
What else can be done here to improve the situation?
3. *Flashfree conference rooms.*
We do have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-895,
unfortunately work on the issue is stalled :(, we are working on improving
red5 so it can support WebRTC, then work on this issue can be resumed
4. *Mobil client with whiteboard function.*
We do have commercial Mobile client:
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=air.org.apache.openmeetings.OmMobile
WB can be implemented for this client, but unfortunately we don't have
enough sales to be able to continue this development :(
5. *consistent and modern, flexible and more attractive gui*
we do have https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-1142. The
main idea was this issue will be resolved automatically as soon as we will
move room to HTML5, but this process seems to be too slow :((
6. *to bring the clipboard content of the os to the whiteboard of om (so
you can substitute the screen sharing in some usecases).*
Currently text OS clipboard is available in OM, but I guess you are talking
about graphical clipboard, this might be interesting idea, could you please
file JIRA issue regarding it?
7. *Cobrowsing could also help to have a better overall impression.*
What do you mean by this? is it some sort of screen-sharing?
On the administrative side for more acceptance we need
8. *an consistent and automated install process from scratch*
Actually right now installer is much better than in previous versions,
could you create JIRA issue/issues on what else need to be improved?
9. *an one command or one-click update process.*
Right now it is approximately 3 commands:
./admin.sh -b -file current_om.zip
tar -xzf apache-openmeetings-3.1.0.tar.gz //here you need to create
separate folder and maybe copy jar file with DB driver
./admin.sh -i -file current_om.zip
but i believe it is simple enough, I perform updates on demo server and
local machines with no issues
If you have idea on how this can be further simplified please share it :)
@Bhushan
1. *We should get rid of Applet to record the screen. Installing
required plugins for this on client machines is cubersome.*
Actually the only alternative I see is installing plugin to the browser,
which is not very good idea :(
While we are using Flash we can use flash to create images of the WB, but
I'm not sure performance will be good enough :(
Maybe you have any idea on how this can be implemented, please share it :)
1. Maximum capacity of conference room 40-50, which is very less. So, I
think there is scope for improvement in clustering functionality.
We do have clustering support and are working on improving room capacity,
unfortunately we have not enough testers to check our enhancements in this
area :(
1. If participants in conference room are using only whiteboard and
audio then there should be auto recording functionality while creating a
room. In our case, it happens very often that teacher(moderator) forgot to
record the session.
Actually autorecording might be implemented without any applet in interview
room (you need no applet to record in interview room), but it is impossible
to record WB without external application :(((
@Jeff
I'm also using WebEx here, but unfortunately it's screensharing does not
work on Linux machines :( We might take a look at it while we will simplify
the room, thanks for the hint!
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Jeff Clay <Je...@cyient.com> wrote:
> I think OM should look at Cisco WebEx and strive to achieve the same
> features and functionalities. I have tried a lot of commercial and open
> source video conferencing and collaboration sites, WebEx seems to be the
> leading standard. From my experience, I would rate web conferencing systems
> as:
>
> 1) Cisco WebEx
> 2) Adobe Connect
> 3) AT&T Connect
> 4) Open Meetings
> 5) Big Blue Button
>
>
>
> On Feb 28, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Bhushan Patil <th...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Maxim, I think following are the area of improvements
>
> 1. We should get rid of Applet to record the screen. Installing
> required plugins for this on client machines is cubersome.
> 2. Maximum capacity of conference room 40-50, which is very less. So,
> I think there is scope for improvement in clustering functionality.
> 3. If participants in conference room are using only whiteboard and
> audio then there should be auto recording functionality while creating a
> room. In our case, it happens very often that teacher(moderator) forgot to
> record the session.
>
> PS: I dont have deep knowledge of OM, so I don't know if above tasks are
> even possible or not.
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Am I right thinking no activity on the topic means, there are no areas of
>> improvement in OpenMeetings?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> GSOC 2016 is coming :)
>>> In case we would like to benefit from it we need to record GSOC ideas
>>> for our project
>>>
>>> I would like to propose to discuss current list [1] and any additional
>>> ideas in this thread
>>> Looking forward for you comments :)
>>>
>>> [1]
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-554?filter=12334770&jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2016
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> DISCLAIMER:
>
> This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
> may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
> review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy
> all copies of the original message. Check all attachments for viruses
> before opening them. All views or opinions presented in this e-mail are
> those of the author and may not reflect the opinion of Cyient or those of
> our affiliates.
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Jeff Clay <Je...@cyient.com>.
I think OM should look at Cisco WebEx and strive to achieve the same features and functionalities. I have tried a lot of commercial and open source video conferencing and collaboration sites, WebEx seems to be the leading standard. From my experience, I would rate web conferencing systems as:
1) Cisco WebEx
2) Adobe Connect
3) AT&T Connect
4) Open Meetings
5) Big Blue Button
On Feb 28, 2016, at 9:14 AM, Bhushan Patil <th...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Maxim, I think following are the area of improvements
1. We should get rid of Applet to record the screen. Installing required plugins for this on client machines is cubersome.
2. Maximum capacity of conference room 40-50, which is very less. So, I think there is scope for improvement in clustering functionality.
3. If participants in conference room are using only whiteboard and audio then there should be auto recording functionality while creating a room. In our case, it happens very often that teacher(moderator) forgot to record the session.
PS: I dont have deep knowledge of OM, so I don't know if above tasks are even possible or not.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Am I right thinking no activity on the topic means, there are no areas of improvement in OpenMeetings?
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello All,
GSOC 2016 is coming :)
In case we would like to benefit from it we need to record GSOC ideas for our project
I would like to propose to discuss current list [1] and any additional ideas in this thread
Looking forward for you comments :)
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-554?filter=12334770&jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2016
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
________________________________
DISCLAIMER:
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. Check all attachments for viruses before opening them. All views or opinions presented in this e-mail are those of the author and may not reflect the opinion of Cyient or those of our affiliates.
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Bhushan Patil <th...@gmail.com>.
Hi Maxim, I think following are the area of improvements
1. We should get rid of Applet to record the screen. Installing required
plugins for this on client machines is cubersome.
2. Maximum capacity of conference room 40-50, which is very less. So, I
think there is scope for improvement in clustering functionality.
3. If participants in conference room are using only whiteboard and
audio then there should be auto recording functionality while creating a
room. In our case, it happens very often that teacher(moderator) forgot to
record the session.
PS: I dont have deep knowledge of OM, so I don't know if above tasks are
even possible or not.
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Am I right thinking no activity on the topic means, there are no areas of
> improvement in OpenMeetings?
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> GSOC 2016 is coming :)
>> In case we would like to benefit from it we need to record GSOC ideas for
>> our project
>>
>> I would like to propose to discuss current list [1] and any additional
>> ideas in this thread
>> Looking forward for you comments :)
>>
>> [1]
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-554?filter=12334770&jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2016
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, I downloaded previous version on the site yesterday, but we have
enough time to make some changes.
I updated the proposal: https://dropmefiles.com/MUggI
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 3:20 AM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah it's already submitted. I will apply to mentor. We now need to wait how
> Google and ASF will evaluate it.
>
> 2016-03-25 10:14 GMT+13:00 seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi Dmitriy,
>>
>> looks all good. I think it's an interesting proposal and you seem to be
>> on a good way to achieve it. Ready to submit IMHO.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sebastian
>>
>> 2016-03-25 8:51 GMT+13:00 <se...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> If you have added the points I think it's ready to submit to the GSoc
>>> website.
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 24/03/2016, at 9:16 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello all, my proposal is here https://dropmefiles.com/c4rK2
>>> Fixes:
>>> - Expand tasks in timeline
>>> - Review timeline and include august
>>> - Add tools description
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:23 AM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
>>> seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> @Dmitriy: Also one more note: Your timeline is a bit off.
>>>> Your timeline end by end of July. But that is only the mid-term
>>>> evaluation. Not finish of the project.
>>>> However the program ends end of August. You are expected to still work
>>>> and clean up your code till 23/08. I would then have time till 29th till
>>>> evaluate, which basically also still means back and forth between you and
>>>> me to understand some details.
>>>> https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline
>>>>
>>>> End of the time line should be end of August.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Sebastian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2016-03-24 10:45 GMT+13:00 seba.wagner@gmail.com <seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>>> >:
>>>>
>>>>> @Dmitriy: Please keep the deadline for submitting your proposal in
>>>>> mind. Also I will need to accept your proposal via the GSoc website in
>>>>> time. So please let me know once your done.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Sebastian
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-03-22 22:29 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Paul,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm forwarding you Dmitriy's question :))
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares
>>>>>> video
>>>>>> between clients?"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe with your help we can add WebRTC to both red5 and
>>>>>> OpenMeetings :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Hello Paul,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares
>>>>>> video
>>>>>> > between clients?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Mondain <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> Yes, I'm interested.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:35 AM Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> > Hello Paul,
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > we currently discussing GSOC2016 ideas, and WebRTC stuff is
>>>>>> still in our
>>>>>> >> > list, are you interested in participating in discussion?
>>>>>> >> > currently there are 2 threads: [1] and [2]
>>>>>> >> > I believe you might ne interested in [1] :)
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/uw2y727szu3gchdk
>>>>>> >> > [2] http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/tb2mtzeizfmtvcpa
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dmitriy - <dima00782@gmail.com
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> Yeah, it's great idea to add Paul.
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> > --
>>>>>> >> > WBR
>>>>>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>>> > Dmitry Bezheckov.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Dmitry Bezheckov.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Wagner
>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
Regards,
Dmitry Bezheckov.
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
Ah it's already submitted. I will apply to mentor. We now need to wait how
Google and ASF will evaluate it.
2016-03-25 10:14 GMT+13:00 seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Dmitriy,
>
> looks all good. I think it's an interesting proposal and you seem to be on
> a good way to achieve it. Ready to submit IMHO.
>
> Thanks,
> Sebastian
>
> 2016-03-25 8:51 GMT+13:00 <se...@gmail.com>:
>
>> If you have added the points I think it's ready to submit to the GSoc
>> website.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 24/03/2016, at 9:16 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello all, my proposal is here https://dropmefiles.com/c4rK2
>> Fixes:
>> - Expand tasks in timeline
>> - Review timeline and include august
>> - Add tools description
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:23 AM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
>> seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> @Dmitriy: Also one more note: Your timeline is a bit off.
>>> Your timeline end by end of July. But that is only the mid-term
>>> evaluation. Not finish of the project.
>>> However the program ends end of August. You are expected to still work
>>> and clean up your code till 23/08. I would then have time till 29th till
>>> evaluate, which basically also still means back and forth between you and
>>> me to understand some details.
>>> https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline
>>>
>>> End of the time line should be end of August.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sebastian
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2016-03-24 10:45 GMT+13:00 seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>
>>> :
>>>
>>>> @Dmitriy: Please keep the deadline for submitting your proposal in
>>>> mind. Also I will need to accept your proposal via the GSoc website in
>>>> time. So please let me know once your done.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Sebastian
>>>>
>>>> 2016-03-22 22:29 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello Paul,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm forwarding you Dmitriy's question :))
>>>>>
>>>>> "Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares
>>>>> video
>>>>> between clients?"
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe with your help we can add WebRTC to both red5 and
>>>>> OpenMeetings :)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> > Hello Paul,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares
>>>>> video
>>>>> > between clients?
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Mondain <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> Yes, I'm interested.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:35 AM Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> > Hello Paul,
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > we currently discussing GSOC2016 ideas, and WebRTC stuff is still
>>>>> in our
>>>>> >> > list, are you interested in participating in discussion?
>>>>> >> > currently there are 2 threads: [1] and [2]
>>>>> >> > I believe you might ne interested in [1] :)
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/uw2y727szu3gchdk
>>>>> >> > [2] http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/tb2mtzeizfmtvcpa
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >> Yeah, it's great idea to add Paul.
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > --
>>>>> >> > WBR
>>>>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Regards,
>>>>> > Dmitry Bezheckov.
>>>>> >
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> WBR
>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Dmitry Bezheckov.
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dmitriy,
looks all good. I think it's an interesting proposal and you seem to be on
a good way to achieve it. Ready to submit IMHO.
Thanks,
Sebastian
2016-03-25 8:51 GMT+13:00 <se...@gmail.com>:
> If you have added the points I think it's ready to submit to the GSoc
> website.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 24/03/2016, at 9:16 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all, my proposal is here https://dropmefiles.com/c4rK2
> Fixes:
> - Expand tasks in timeline
> - Review timeline and include august
> - Add tools description
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:23 AM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
> seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> @Dmitriy: Also one more note: Your timeline is a bit off.
>> Your timeline end by end of July. But that is only the mid-term
>> evaluation. Not finish of the project.
>> However the program ends end of August. You are expected to still work
>> and clean up your code till 23/08. I would then have time till 29th till
>> evaluate, which basically also still means back and forth between you and
>> me to understand some details.
>> https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline
>>
>> End of the time line should be end of August.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sebastian
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-03-24 10:45 GMT+13:00 seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> @Dmitriy: Please keep the deadline for submitting your proposal in mind.
>>> Also I will need to accept your proposal via the GSoc website in time. So
>>> please let me know once your done.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sebastian
>>>
>>> 2016-03-22 22:29 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>>> Hello Paul,
>>>>
>>>> I'm forwarding you Dmitriy's question :))
>>>>
>>>> "Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares
>>>> video
>>>> between clients?"
>>>>
>>>> I believe with your help we can add WebRTC to both red5 and
>>>> OpenMeetings :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hello Paul,
>>>> >
>>>> > Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares
>>>> video
>>>> > between clients?
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Mondain <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Yes, I'm interested.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:35 AM Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > Hello Paul,
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > we currently discussing GSOC2016 ideas, and WebRTC stuff is still
>>>> in our
>>>> >> > list, are you interested in participating in discussion?
>>>> >> > currently there are 2 threads: [1] and [2]
>>>> >> > I believe you might ne interested in [1] :)
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/uw2y727szu3gchdk
>>>> >> > [2] http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/tb2mtzeizfmtvcpa
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >> Yeah, it's great idea to add Paul.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > --
>>>> >> > WBR
>>>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> > Dmitry Bezheckov.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> WBR
>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Wagner
>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Dmitry Bezheckov.
>
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by se...@gmail.com.
If you have added the points I think it's ready to submit to the GSoc website.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 24/03/2016, at 9:16 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all, my proposal is here https://dropmefiles.com/c4rK2
> Fixes:
> - Expand tasks in timeline
> - Review timeline and include august
> - Add tools description
>
>
>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:23 AM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> @Dmitriy: Also one more note: Your timeline is a bit off.
>> Your timeline end by end of July. But that is only the mid-term evaluation. Not finish of the project.
>> However the program ends end of August. You are expected to still work and clean up your code till 23/08. I would then have time till 29th till evaluate, which basically also still means back and forth between you and me to understand some details.
>> https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline
>>
>> End of the time line should be end of August.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sebastian
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-03-24 10:45 GMT+13:00 seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>:
>>> @Dmitriy: Please keep the deadline for submitting your proposal in mind. Also I will need to accept your proposal via the GSoc website in time. So please let me know once your done.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sebastian
>>>
>>> 2016-03-22 22:29 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
>>>> Hello Paul,
>>>>
>>>> I'm forwarding you Dmitriy's question :))
>>>>
>>>> "Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares video
>>>> between clients?"
>>>>
>>>> I believe with your help we can add WebRTC to both red5 and OpenMeetings :)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hello Paul,
>>>> >
>>>> > Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares video
>>>> > between clients?
>>>> >
>>>> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Mondain <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Yes, I'm interested.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:35 AM Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> > Hello Paul,
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > we currently discussing GSOC2016 ideas, and WebRTC stuff is still in our
>>>> >> > list, are you interested in participating in discussion?
>>>> >> > currently there are 2 threads: [1] and [2]
>>>> >> > I believe you might ne interested in [1] :)
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/uw2y727szu3gchdk
>>>> >> > [2] http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/tb2mtzeizfmtvcpa
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>
>>>> >> wrote:
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >> Yeah, it's great idea to add Paul.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > --
>>>> >> > WBR
>>>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>>>> >> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Regards,
>>>> > Dmitry Bezheckov.
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> WBR
>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sebastian Wagner
>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Wagner
>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Dmitry Bezheckov.
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>.
Hello all, my proposal is here https://dropmefiles.com/c4rK2
Fixes:
- Expand tasks in timeline
- Review timeline and include august
- Add tools description
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 6:23 AM, seba.wagner@gmail.com <
seba.wagner@gmail.com> wrote:
> @Dmitriy: Also one more note: Your timeline is a bit off.
> Your timeline end by end of July. But that is only the mid-term
> evaluation. Not finish of the project.
> However the program ends end of August. You are expected to still work and
> clean up your code till 23/08. I would then have time till 29th till
> evaluate, which basically also still means back and forth between you and
> me to understand some details.
> https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline
>
> End of the time line should be end of August.
>
> Thanks,
> Sebastian
>
>
>
> 2016-03-24 10:45 GMT+13:00 seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>:
>
>> @Dmitriy: Please keep the deadline for submitting your proposal in mind.
>> Also I will need to accept your proposal via the GSoc website in time. So
>> please let me know once your done.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sebastian
>>
>> 2016-03-22 22:29 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hello Paul,
>>>
>>> I'm forwarding you Dmitriy's question :))
>>>
>>> "Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares
>>> video
>>> between clients?"
>>>
>>> I believe with your help we can add WebRTC to both red5 and OpenMeetings
>>> :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello Paul,
>>> >
>>> > Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares
>>> video
>>> > between clients?
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Mondain <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Yes, I'm interested.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:35 AM Maxim Solodovnik <
>>> solomax666@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> > Hello Paul,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > we currently discussing GSOC2016 ideas, and WebRTC stuff is still
>>> in our
>>> >> > list, are you interested in participating in discussion?
>>> >> > currently there are 2 threads: [1] and [2]
>>> >> > I believe you might ne interested in [1] :)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/uw2y727szu3gchdk
>>> >> > [2] http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/tb2mtzeizfmtvcpa
>>> >> >
>>> >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> Yeah, it's great idea to add Paul.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> >
>>> >> > --
>>> >> > WBR
>>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>>> >> >
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Dmitry Bezheckov.
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Sebastian Wagner
>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
>> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
Regards,
Dmitry Bezheckov.
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
@Dmitriy: Also one more note: Your timeline is a bit off.
Your timeline end by end of July. But that is only the mid-term evaluation.
Not finish of the project.
However the program ends end of August. You are expected to still work and
clean up your code till 23/08. I would then have time till 29th till
evaluate, which basically also still means back and forth between you and
me to understand some details.
https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline
End of the time line should be end of August.
Thanks,
Sebastian
2016-03-24 10:45 GMT+13:00 seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>:
> @Dmitriy: Please keep the deadline for submitting your proposal in mind.
> Also I will need to accept your proposal via the GSoc website in time. So
> please let me know once your done.
>
> Thanks,
> Sebastian
>
> 2016-03-22 22:29 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hello Paul,
>>
>> I'm forwarding you Dmitriy's question :))
>>
>> "Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares video
>> between clients?"
>>
>> I believe with your help we can add WebRTC to both red5 and OpenMeetings
>> :)
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Paul,
>> >
>> > Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares
>> video
>> > between clients?
>> >
>> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Mondain <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Yes, I'm interested.
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:35 AM Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
>> >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Hello Paul,
>> >> >
>> >> > we currently discussing GSOC2016 ideas, and WebRTC stuff is still in
>> our
>> >> > list, are you interested in participating in discussion?
>> >> > currently there are 2 threads: [1] and [2]
>> >> > I believe you might ne interested in [1] :)
>> >> >
>> >> > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/uw2y727szu3gchdk
>> >> > [2] http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/tb2mtzeizfmtvcpa
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Yeah, it's great idea to add Paul.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > WBR
>> >> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Regards,
>> > Dmitry Bezheckov.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
@Dmitriy: Please keep the deadline for submitting your proposal in mind.
Also I will need to accept your proposal via the GSoc website in time. So
please let me know once your done.
Thanks,
Sebastian
2016-03-22 22:29 GMT+13:00 Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>:
> Hello Paul,
>
> I'm forwarding you Dmitriy's question :))
>
> "Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares video
> between clients?"
>
> I believe with your help we can add WebRTC to both red5 and OpenMeetings :)
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello Paul,
> >
> > Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares video
> > between clients?
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Mondain <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, I'm interested.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:35 AM Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hello Paul,
> >> >
> >> > we currently discussing GSOC2016 ideas, and WebRTC stuff is still in
> our
> >> > list, are you interested in participating in discussion?
> >> > currently there are 2 threads: [1] and [2]
> >> > I believe you might ne interested in [1] :)
> >> >
> >> > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/uw2y727szu3gchdk
> >> > [2] http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/tb2mtzeizfmtvcpa
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Yeah, it's great idea to add Paul.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > WBR
> >> > Maxim aka solomax
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Dmitry Bezheckov.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Mondain <mo...@gmail.com>.
I'll try to answer in-line as best as possible.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 5:29 AM Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> I'm forwarding you Dmitriy's question :))
>
> "Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares
> video between clients?"
>
> A facade is created to represent a webrtc publisher or subscriber on the
server, they are either sendonly or readonly via their sdp. Ice4j is used
in trickle mode to determine ip addresses and ports; all of that is
coordinated on the server and communicated via websocket. Any transcoding
or rtp/rtcp is handled via libjitsi.
> I believe with your help we can add WebRTC to both red5 and OpenMeetings :)
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Paul,
>>
>> Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares video
>> between clients?
>>
>
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Mondain <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, I'm interested.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:35 AM Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello Paul,
>>> >
>>> > we currently discussing GSOC2016 ideas, and WebRTC stuff is still in
>>> our
>>> > list, are you interested in participating in discussion?
>>> > currently there are 2 threads: [1] and [2]
>>> > I believe you might ne interested in [1] :)
>>> >
>>> > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/uw2y727szu3gchdk
>>> > [2] http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/tb2mtzeizfmtvcpa
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Yeah, it's great idea to add Paul.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > WBR
>>> > Maxim aka solomax
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Dmitry Bezheckov.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Hello Paul,
I'm forwarding you Dmitriy's question :))
"Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares video
between clients?"
I believe with your help we can add WebRTC to both red5 and OpenMeetings :)
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 1:15 AM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares video
> between clients?
>
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Mondain <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes, I'm interested.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:35 AM Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello Paul,
>> >
>> > we currently discussing GSOC2016 ideas, and WebRTC stuff is still in our
>> > list, are you interested in participating in discussion?
>> > currently there are 2 threads: [1] and [2]
>> > I believe you might ne interested in [1] :)
>> >
>> > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/uw2y727szu3gchdk
>> > [2] http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/tb2mtzeizfmtvcpa
>> >
>> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Yeah, it's great idea to add Paul.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > WBR
>> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Dmitry Bezheckov.
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>.
Hello Paul,
Could you please describe how red5 used ice4j and how server shares video
between clients?
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 7:13 AM, Mondain <mo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, I'm interested.
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:35 AM Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Paul,
> >
> > we currently discussing GSOC2016 ideas, and WebRTC stuff is still in our
> > list, are you interested in participating in discussion?
> > currently there are 2 threads: [1] and [2]
> > I believe you might ne interested in [1] :)
> >
> > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/uw2y727szu3gchdk
> > [2] http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/tb2mtzeizfmtvcpa
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Yeah, it's great idea to add Paul.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>
--
Regards,
Dmitry Bezheckov.
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Mondain <mo...@gmail.com>.
Yes, I'm interested.
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 4:35 AM Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello Paul,
>
> we currently discussing GSOC2016 ideas, and WebRTC stuff is still in our
> list, are you interested in participating in discussion?
> currently there are 2 threads: [1] and [2]
> I believe you might ne interested in [1] :)
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/thread/uw2y727szu3gchdk
> [2] http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/tb2mtzeizfmtvcpa
>
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yeah, it's great idea to add Paul.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Hello Paul,
we currently discussing GSOC2016 ideas, and WebRTC stuff is still in our
list, are you interested in participating in discussion?
currently there are 2 threads: [1] and [2]
I believe you might ne interested in [1] :)
[1] http://markmail.org/thread/uw2y727szu3gchdk
[2] http://openmeetings.markmail.org/thread/tb2mtzeizfmtvcpa
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, it's great idea to add Paul.
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>.
Yeah, it's great idea to add Paul.
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
high level description is OK with me
we can add Paul to the discussion, WDYT?
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Dmitry Bezheckov <di...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> I think about it now.
> We can't remove central server in general, but we can distribute video and
> audio channel as Maxim said.
> I like to think that we have:
>
> 1. SCTP (GSOC 2015) for signaling
> 2. TURN[/STUN] server for NAT traversing (GSOC 2016)
> 3. SRTP protocol for secure sharing media (GSOC 2016)
>
>
> As I can see SRTP protocol has implemented in Java already (for example in
> jitsu -
> https://github.com/jitsi/libjitsi/tree/master/src/org/jitsi/impl/neomedia/transform/srtp
> )
>
> If this high-level description is OK, I can create issue in jira and write
> more detailed proposal.
>
> P.s. for second point exist ice4j library (GSOC 2014 - 2015), but I hasn't
> seen on this clearly yet.
>
> On 15.03.2016 03:15, seba.wagner@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
>> your ideas are all very interesting, however to tailor a GSoC2016 project
>> out of it you have to choose something which will fit into the program of
>> a
>> few months of work.
>> And it will need a defined scope/requirement and success criteria.
>>
>> What is your exact proposal ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sebastian
>>
>>
>>
>> 2016-03-10 19:40 GMT+13:00 Dmitry Bezheckov <di...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
>>> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:41:51 +0600
>>> From: Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>
>>> To: dev <de...@openmeetings.apache.org>
>>> CC: Openmeetings user-list <us...@openmeetings.apache.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I think it's a good idea to continue gsoc2015 direction for OM.
>>> First of all we can change OM architecture from central server to p2p and
>>> then use new protocols like QUIC or SCTP.
>>> Using this we also save our ability save video on central server. Central
>>> server will not only link clients, but also include itself in connection.
>>> And we also can support flash clinets too.
>>> The protocols were developed for http 2 purposes and so using this
>>> protocols will improve perfomance OM on andoid and desktop, as I can see
>>> android is one of main architecture for OM.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
>>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am I right thinking no activity on the topic means, there are no
>>> areas of
>>> improvement in OpenMeetings?
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
>>> <solomax666@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hello All,
>>> >
>>> > GSOC 2016 is coming :)
>>> > In case we would like to benefit from it we need to record GSOC
>>> ideas for
>>> > our project
>>> >
>>> > I would like to propose to discuss current list [1] and any
>>> additional
>>> > ideas in this thread
>>> > Looking forward for you comments :)
>>> >
>>> > [1]
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-554?filter=12334770&jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2016
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > WBR
>>> > Maxim aka solomax
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> WBR
>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Dmitry Bezheckov.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Dmitry Bezheckov <di...@gmail.com>.
Hi Sebastian,
I think about it now.
We can't remove central server in general, but we can distribute video
and audio channel as Maxim said.
I like to think that we have:
1. SCTP (GSOC 2015) for signaling
2. TURN[/STUN] server for NAT traversing (GSOC 2016)
3. SRTP protocol for secure sharing media (GSOC 2016)
As I can see SRTP protocol has implemented in Java already (for example
in jitsu -
https://github.com/jitsi/libjitsi/tree/master/src/org/jitsi/impl/neomedia/transform/srtp)
If this high-level description is OK, I can create issue in jira and
write more detailed proposal.
P.s. for second point exist ice4j library (GSOC 2014 - 2015), but I
hasn't seen on this clearly yet.
On 15.03.2016 03:15, seba.wagner@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> your ideas are all very interesting, however to tailor a GSoC2016 project
> out of it you have to choose something which will fit into the program of a
> few months of work.
> And it will need a defined scope/requirement and success criteria.
>
> What is your exact proposal ?
>
> Thanks,
> Sebastian
>
>
>
> 2016-03-10 19:40 GMT+13:00 Dmitry Bezheckov <di...@gmail.com>:
>
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
>> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:41:51 +0600
>> From: Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev <de...@openmeetings.apache.org>
>> CC: Openmeetings user-list <us...@openmeetings.apache.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> I think it's a good idea to continue gsoc2015 direction for OM.
>> First of all we can change OM architecture from central server to p2p and
>> then use new protocols like QUIC or SCTP.
>> Using this we also save our ability save video on central server. Central
>> server will not only link clients, but also include itself in connection.
>> And we also can support flash clinets too.
>> The protocols were developed for http 2 purposes and so using this
>> protocols will improve perfomance OM on andoid and desktop, as I can see
>> android is one of main architecture for OM.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Am I right thinking no activity on the topic means, there are no
>> areas of
>> improvement in OpenMeetings?
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
>> <solomax666@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hello All,
>> >
>> > GSOC 2016 is coming :)
>> > In case we would like to benefit from it we need to record GSOC
>> ideas for
>> > our project
>> >
>> > I would like to propose to discuss current list [1] and any
>> additional
>> > ideas in this thread
>> > Looking forward for you comments :)
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-554?filter=12334770&jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2016
>> >
>> > --
>> > WBR
>> > Maxim aka solomax
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> WBR
>> Maxim aka solomax
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Dmitry Bezheckov.
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dmitry,
your ideas are all very interesting, however to tailor a GSoC2016 project
out of it you have to choose something which will fit into the program of a
few months of work.
And it will need a defined scope/requirement and success criteria.
What is your exact proposal ?
Thanks,
Sebastian
2016-03-10 19:40 GMT+13:00 Dmitry Bezheckov <di...@gmail.com>:
>
>
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:41:51 +0600
> From: Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>
> To: dev <de...@openmeetings.apache.org>
> CC: Openmeetings user-list <us...@openmeetings.apache.org>
>
>
>
> I think it's a good idea to continue gsoc2015 direction for OM.
> First of all we can change OM architecture from central server to p2p and
> then use new protocols like QUIC or SCTP.
> Using this we also save our ability save video on central server. Central
> server will not only link clients, but also include itself in connection.
> And we also can support flash clinets too.
> The protocols were developed for http 2 purposes and so using this
> protocols will improve perfomance OM on andoid and desktop, as I can see
> android is one of main architecture for OM.
>
> What do you think?
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Am I right thinking no activity on the topic means, there are no
> areas of
> improvement in OpenMeetings?
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
> <solomax666@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > GSOC 2016 is coming :)
> > In case we would like to benefit from it we need to record GSOC
> ideas for
> > our project
> >
> > I would like to propose to discuss current list [1] and any
> additional
> > ideas in this thread
> > Looking forward for you comments :)
> >
> > [1]
> >
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-554?filter=12334770&jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2016
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Dmitry Bezheckov.
>
>
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Fwd: Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Dmitry Bezheckov <di...@gmail.com>.
-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 18:41:51 +0600
From: Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>
To: dev <de...@openmeetings.apache.org>
CC: Openmeetings user-list <us...@openmeetings.apache.org>
I think it's a good idea to continue gsoc2015 direction for OM.
First of all we can change OM architecture from central server to p2p
and then use new protocols like QUIC or SCTP.
Using this we also save our ability save video on central server.
Central server will not only link clients, but also include itself in
connection.
And we also can support flash clinets too.
The protocols were developed for http 2 purposes and so using this
protocols will improve perfomance OM on andoid and desktop, as I can see
android is one of main architecture for OM.
What do you think?
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax666@gmail.com
<ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Am I right thinking no activity on the topic means, there are no
areas of
improvement in OpenMeetings?
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Maxim Solodovnik
<solomax666@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> GSOC 2016 is coming :)
> In case we would like to benefit from it we need to record GSOC
ideas for
> our project
>
> I would like to propose to discuss current list [1] and any
additional
> ideas in this thread
> Looking forward for you comments :)
>
> [1]
>
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-554?filter=12334770&jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2016
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
Regards,
Dmitry Bezheckov.
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Dmitriy - <di...@gmail.com>.
I think it's a good idea to continue gsoc2015 direction for OM.
First of all we can change OM architecture from central server to p2p and
then use new protocols like QUIC or SCTP.
Using this we also save our ability save video on central server. Central
server will not only link clients, but also include itself in connection.
And we also can support flash clinets too.
The protocols were developed for http 2 purposes and so using this
protocols will improve perfomance OM on andoid and desktop, as I can see
android is one of main architecture for OM.
What do you think?
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Am I right thinking no activity on the topic means, there are no areas of
> improvement in OpenMeetings?
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > GSOC 2016 is coming :)
> > In case we would like to benefit from it we need to record GSOC ideas for
> > our project
> >
> > I would like to propose to discuss current list [1] and any additional
> > ideas in this thread
> > Looking forward for you comments :)
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-554?filter=12334770&jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2016
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >
>
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
Regards,
Dmitry Bezheckov.
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Am I right thinking no activity on the topic means, there are no areas of
improvement in OpenMeetings?
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> GSOC 2016 is coming :)
> In case we would like to benefit from it we need to record GSOC ideas for
> our project
>
> I would like to propose to discuss current list [1] and any additional
> ideas in this thread
> Looking forward for you comments :)
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-554?filter=12334770&jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2016
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
Re: [DISCUSSION] GSOC 2016 ideas
Posted by Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>.
Am I right thinking no activity on the topic means, there are no areas of
improvement in OpenMeetings?
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:35 PM, Maxim Solodovnik <so...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> GSOC 2016 is coming :)
> In case we would like to benefit from it we need to record GSOC ideas for
> our project
>
> I would like to propose to discuss current list [1] and any additional
> ideas in this thread
> Looking forward for you comments :)
>
> [1]
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-554?filter=12334770&jql=project%20%3D%20OPENMEETINGS%20AND%20labels%20%3D%20gsoc2016
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax