You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> on 2007/06/12 04:59:42 UTC
[VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)
I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
[ ] +1 release
[ ] 0 abstain
[ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
> the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
> local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
> Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>
> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>
> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)
Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
+1 for all 4 assemblies.
Joe
Jay D. McHugh wrote:
> Full test (server start, database pool creations, app deploy, and app use)
> +1 tomcat-jee5
> +0 jetty-jee5 (app use fails - testing further to determine reason)
>
> Basic test (server start and stop)
> +1 tomcat-minimal
> +1 jetty-minimal
>
> Jay
>
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
>> the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
>> local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
>> Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>>
>> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>>
>> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 release
>> [ ] 0 abstain
>> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)
Posted by "Jay D. McHugh" <ja...@joyfulnoisewebdesign.com>.
Full test (server start, database pool creations, app deploy, and app use)
+1 tomcat-jee5
+0 jetty-jee5 (app use fails - testing further to determine reason)
Basic test (server start and stop)
+1 tomcat-minimal
+1 jetty-minimal
Jay
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
> the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
> local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
> Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>
> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>
> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)
Posted by Gianny Damour <gi...@optusnet.com.au>.
Sorry, I am late; however here is another +1.
Thanks,
Gianny
On 12/06/2007, at 12:59 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building
> from the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If
> I build local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped
> correctly. Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>
> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>
> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
+1
--kevan
On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:59 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building
> from the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If
> I build local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped
> correctly. Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>
> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>
> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
+1
Jacek
On 6/12/07, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
> the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
> local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
> Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>
> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>
> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
>
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)
Posted by Prasad Kashyap <go...@gmail.com>.
+1
Cheers
Prasad
On 6/11/07, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
> the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
> local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
> Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>
> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>
> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)
Posted by Dain Sundstrom <da...@iq80.com>.
+1
-dain
On Jun 11, 2007, at 7:59 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building
> from the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If
> I build local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped
> correctly. Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>
> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>
> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)
Posted by Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>.
+1
Lin
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
> the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
> local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
> Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>
> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>
> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)
Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:59 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building
> from the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If
> I build local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped
> correctly. Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>
> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>
> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3) - PASSED (12 +1 votes)
Posted by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>.
ok, got it. Here is the link to see the changes right away, the live site will take some time to update
http://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxSITE/
btw, I haven't figured out how to include the cert logo in the "news" without destroying the rest of the page but will keep looking for a solution for the home page.
Cheers!
Hernan
Hernan Cunico wrote:
> working on it ! ;-)
>
> Cheers!
> Hernan
>
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> 13 +1's (including an implicit one by me)
>>
>> I copied the files to the dist dir last night. We should updated the
>> web site and download pages. Hernan, can you give that a go ?
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:59 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>
>>> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
>>> the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
>>> local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
>>> Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>>>
>>> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>>>
>>> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 release
>>> [ ] 0 abstain
>>> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3) - PASSED (12 +1 votes)
Posted by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>.
working on it ! ;-)
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> 13 +1's (including an implicit one by me)
>
> I copied the files to the dist dir last night. We should updated the
> web site and download pages. Hernan, can you give that a go ?
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:59 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
>> the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
>> local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
>> Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>>
>> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>>
>> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 release
>> [ ] 0 abstain
>> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3) - PASSED (12 +1 votes)
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
13 +1's (including an implicit one by me)
I copied the files to the dist dir last night. We should updated the
web site and download pages. Hernan, can you give that a go ?
Thanks!
On Jun 11, 2007, at 10:59 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building
> from the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If
> I build local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped
> correctly. Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>
> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>
> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)
Posted by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>.
+1
Cheers!
Hernan
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
> the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
> local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
> Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>
> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>
> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
+1
-Donald
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
> the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
> local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
> Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>
> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>
> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 2.0-M6 (rc3)
Posted by Anita Kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com>.
+1
Anita
--- Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> I think I've narrowed the problem on the rebuild. When building from
>
> the top-level it seems we pick up more cars than we want. If I build
>
> local in the assemblies dir then things seem to be scoped correctly.
>
> Something odd with Maven and / or how were using it.
>
> The binaries are uploading now so please take a peek.
>
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/2.0-M6-rc3
>
> Vote concludes on Thursday June 14th at 2300 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 release
> [ ] 0 abstain
> [ ] -1 Don't ship...provide reason
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
No need to miss a message. Get email on-the-go
with Yahoo! Mail for Mobile. Get started.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/mail