You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@wicket.apache.org by Niranjan Rao <nh...@gmail.com> on 2014/11/11 02:02:11 UTC
Web sockets - version confusion
Greetings,
Document at https://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/nativewebsockets.html
shows maven example. I am assuming that the version in the example is
wicket version.
However maven repository search does not show jar files for version
6.18.0 or any versions in 6.* series. Wicket-native-websocket does show
all the versions at
http://search.maven.org/#search|gav|1|g%3A%22org.apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22
Is this documentation problem? Should I be using wicket-native-websocket
and not wicket-native-websocket-javax for jsr 356.
Regards,
Niranjan
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Web sockets - version confusion
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:32 AM, Adam Hammer <ad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I also found it confusing, I use wicket-native-websocket-jetty9 with wicket
> 6.18 and jetty 9.0.+
I'll update the guide.
>
> I was not able to get running on jetty 9.2 yet.
>
Jetty 9.2+ is JSR356 complaint so you should use
wicket-native-websocket-javax. Same for Tomcat 8+.
But websocket-api.jar, jetty-**.jar (9.2) and tomcat 8 are built with Java
7. This is the reason why wicket-native-websocket-javax is available only
for Wicket 7.
If you use JDK 1.7+ for your applications then you can use wicket-core 6.x
together with wicket-native-websocket-javax 7.0.0-M4. Make sure you add
Maven <exclusions> for wicket-core/util/request:7.0.0-M4
>
> Adam
> On Nov 10, 2014 5:04 PM, "Niranjan Rao" <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Greetings,
> >
> > Document at https://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/nativewebsockets.html
> > shows maven example. I am assuming that the version in the example is
> > wicket version.
> >
> > However maven repository search does not show jar files for version
> 6.18.0
> > or any versions in 6.* series. Wicket-native-websocket does show all the
> > versions at http://search.maven.org/#search|gav|1|g%3A%22org.
> > apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22
> > <
> http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22
> >
> >
> > Is this documentation problem? Should I be using wicket-native-websocket
> > and not wicket-native-websocket-javax for jsr 356.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Niranjan
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: Web sockets - version confusion
Posted by Adam Hammer <ad...@gmail.com>.
I also found it confusing, I use wicket-native-websocket-jetty9 with wicket
6.18 and jetty 9.0.+
I was not able to get running on jetty 9.2 yet.
Adam
On Nov 10, 2014 5:04 PM, "Niranjan Rao" <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Document at https://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/nativewebsockets.html
> shows maven example. I am assuming that the version in the example is
> wicket version.
>
> However maven repository search does not show jar files for version 6.18.0
> or any versions in 6.* series. Wicket-native-websocket does show all the
> versions at http://search.maven.org/#search|gav|1|g%3A%22org.
> apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22
> <http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22>
>
> Is this documentation problem? Should I be using wicket-native-websocket
> and not wicket-native-websocket-javax for jsr 356.
>
> Regards,
>
> Niranjan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: Web sockets - version confusion
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Niranjan Rao <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Another naive question. POM file for wicket-native-websocket-javax
> version 7.0.0.-M4 (https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/
> wicket-native-websocket-javax/7.0.0-M4/wicket-native-
> websocket-javax-7.0.0-M4.pom) includes jetty dependencies.
>
> If I am using some other container such as tomcat, do I need to include
> these dependencies in the final WAR file?
>
No.
<scope>test</scope>. See
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html#Dependency_Scope
for more details.
>
> Regards,
>
> Niranjan
>
>
> On 11/11/2014 10:16 AM, Niranjan Rao wrote:
>
>> Martin,
>>
>> Thanks for the reply. If I understand you correctly I need to do
>> following so that I have JSR 356 compliant code which in theory will be
>> independent of container.
>>
>> 1. Use 7.0* version for wicket-native-websocket-javax
>> 2. Use maven exclusions so that wicket 7 code is not included.
>>
>> This was the point that was confusing in the documentation.
>>
>> I see the new note added in the document. Thank you.
>>
>> Is it possible to add exclusion information to that note as many people
>> are still on 6.* versions and this might be common source of confusion.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Niranjan
>> On 11/10/2014 11:29 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Niranjan Rao <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>>
>>>> Document at https://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/nativewebsockets.html
>>>> shows maven example. I am assuming that the version in the example is
>>>> wicket version.
>>>>
>>>> However maven repository search does not show jar files for version
>>>> 6.18.0
>>>> or any versions in 6.* series. Wicket-native-websocket does show all the
>>>> versions at http://search.maven.org/#search|gav|1|g%3A%22org
>>>> <http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org>.
>>>> apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22
>>>> <http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.
>>>> apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22>
>>>>
>>>
>>> http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/ contains all modules
>>> with their experimental (0.x) and stable versions (6.x and 7.x).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Is this documentation problem? Should I be using wicket-native-websocket
>>>> and not wicket-native-websocket-javax for jsr 356.
>>>>
>>>> The module you should use depends on the web container you use (Jetty
>>> 7/8,
>>> Jetty 9.1, Jetty 9.2+ (javax), Tomcat 7, Tomcat 8+ (javax).
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Niranjan
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: Web sockets - version confusion
Posted by Niranjan Rao <nh...@gmail.com>.
Another naive question. POM file for wicket-native-websocket-javax
version 7.0.0.-M4
(https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/wicket-native-websocket-javax/7.0.0-M4/wicket-native-websocket-javax-7.0.0-M4.pom)
includes jetty dependencies.
If I am using some other container such as tomcat, do I need to include
these dependencies in the final WAR file?
Regards,
Niranjan
On 11/11/2014 10:16 AM, Niranjan Rao wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Thanks for the reply. If I understand you correctly I need to do
> following so that I have JSR 356 compliant code which in theory will
> be independent of container.
>
> 1. Use 7.0* version for wicket-native-websocket-javax
> 2. Use maven exclusions so that wicket 7 code is not included.
>
> This was the point that was confusing in the documentation.
>
> I see the new note added in the document. Thank you.
>
> Is it possible to add exclusion information to that note as many
> people are still on 6.* versions and this might be common source of
> confusion.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Niranjan
> On 11/10/2014 11:29 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Niranjan Rao <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Document at https://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/nativewebsockets.html
>>> shows maven example. I am assuming that the version in the example is
>>> wicket version.
>>>
>>> However maven repository search does not show jar files for version
>>> 6.18.0
>>> or any versions in 6.* series. Wicket-native-websocket does show all
>>> the
>>> versions at http://search.maven.org/#search|gav|1|g%3A%22org.
>>> apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22
>>> <http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22>
>>>
>>
>> http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/ contains all modules
>> with their experimental (0.x) and stable versions (6.x and 7.x).
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Is this documentation problem? Should I be using
>>> wicket-native-websocket
>>> and not wicket-native-websocket-javax for jsr 356.
>>>
>> The module you should use depends on the web container you use (Jetty
>> 7/8,
>> Jetty 9.1, Jetty 9.2+ (javax), Tomcat 7, Tomcat 8+ (javax).
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Niranjan
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Web sockets - version confusion
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Niranjan Rao <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Thanks for the reply. If I understand you correctly I need to do following
> so that I have JSR 356 compliant code which in theory will be independent
> of container.
>
> 1. Use 7.0* version for wicket-native-websocket-javax
> 2. Use maven exclusions so that wicket 7 code is not included.
>
> This was the point that was confusing in the documentation.
>
> I see the new note added in the document. Thank you.
>
> Is it possible to add exclusion information to that note as many people
> are still on 6.* versions and this might be common source of confusion.
>
I'd recommend to use Wicket 7.x instead of mixing versions.
But I'd apply a patch if you send it. See
http://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/contributing.html
Thank you!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Niranjan
> On 11/10/2014 11:29 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Niranjan Rao <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Document at https://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/nativewebsockets.html
>>> shows maven example. I am assuming that the version in the example is
>>> wicket version.
>>>
>>> However maven repository search does not show jar files for version
>>> 6.18.0
>>> or any versions in 6.* series. Wicket-native-websocket does show all the
>>> versions at http://search.maven.org/#search|gav|1|g%3A%22org
>>> <http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org>.
>>> apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22
>>> <http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.
>>> apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22>
>>>
>>
>> http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/ contains all modules
>> with their experimental (0.x) and stable versions (6.x and 7.x).
>>
>>
>>
>>> Is this documentation problem? Should I be using wicket-native-websocket
>>> and not wicket-native-websocket-javax for jsr 356.
>>>
>>> The module you should use depends on the web container you use (Jetty
>> 7/8,
>> Jetty 9.1, Jetty 9.2+ (javax), Tomcat 7, Tomcat 8+ (javax).
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Niranjan
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>
Re: Web sockets - version confusion
Posted by Niranjan Rao <nh...@gmail.com>.
Martin,
Thanks for the reply. If I understand you correctly I need to do
following so that I have JSR 356 compliant code which in theory will be
independent of container.
1. Use 7.0* version for wicket-native-websocket-javax
2. Use maven exclusions so that wicket 7 code is not included.
This was the point that was confusing in the documentation.
I see the new note added in the document. Thank you.
Is it possible to add exclusion information to that note as many people
are still on 6.* versions and this might be common source of confusion.
Best regards,
Niranjan
On 11/10/2014 11:29 PM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Niranjan Rao <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Document at https://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/nativewebsockets.html
>> shows maven example. I am assuming that the version in the example is
>> wicket version.
>>
>> However maven repository search does not show jar files for version 6.18.0
>> or any versions in 6.* series. Wicket-native-websocket does show all the
>> versions at http://search.maven.org/#search|gav|1|g%3A%22org.
>> apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22
>> <http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22>
>
> http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/ contains all modules
> with their experimental (0.x) and stable versions (6.x and 7.x).
>
>
>>
>> Is this documentation problem? Should I be using wicket-native-websocket
>> and not wicket-native-websocket-javax for jsr 356.
>>
> The module you should use depends on the web container you use (Jetty 7/8,
> Jetty 9.1, Jetty 9.2+ (javax), Tomcat 7, Tomcat 8+ (javax).
>
>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Niranjan
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
Re: Web sockets - version confusion
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Niranjan Rao <nh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Document at https://wicket.apache.org/guide/guide/nativewebsockets.html
> shows maven example. I am assuming that the version in the example is
> wicket version.
>
> However maven repository search does not show jar files for version 6.18.0
> or any versions in 6.* series. Wicket-native-websocket does show all the
> versions at http://search.maven.org/#search|gav|1|g%3A%22org.
> apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22
> <http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22org.apache.wicket%22%20AND%20a%3A%22wicket-native-websocket%22>
http://central.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/wicket/ contains all modules
with their experimental (0.x) and stable versions (6.x and 7.x).
>
>
> Is this documentation problem? Should I be using wicket-native-websocket
> and not wicket-native-websocket-javax for jsr 356.
>
The module you should use depends on the web container you use (Jetty 7/8,
Jetty 9.1, Jetty 9.2+ (javax), Tomcat 7, Tomcat 8+ (javax).
>
> Regards,
>
> Niranjan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@wicket.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@wicket.apache.org
>
>