You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@beam.apache.org by "Pablo Estrada (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/04/18 04:39:41 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (BEAM-1986) Job ALREADY_EXISTS in post commit

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1986?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15972105#comment-15972105 ] 

Pablo Estrada commented on BEAM-1986:
-------------------------------------

Are tests running in parallel here? If they are running in parallel, then a 1-second delay should not fix this issue, as two job names may still be generated at the same second (just one second later : ). So I agree that a random component or a more fine-grained time unit should help reduce this issue.

> Job ALREADY_EXISTS in post commit
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-1986
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-1986
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: sdk-py
>            Reporter: Ahmet Altay
>            Assignee: Mark Liu
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I noticed a job failed with ALREDY_EXISTS error, a sign of same {{job_name}} auto generated twice. Could we add a 1 second delay to prevent things like this?
> https://builds.apache.org/view/Beam/job/beam_PostCommit_Python_Verify/1877/consoleFull
> cc: [~pabloem] Another perspective, would it make sense to add a small random component (e.g. 1-2 digits) to job name to reduce this issue? Or perhaps include ms resolution. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)