You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by List <li...@nchost.net> on 2005/11/21 04:20:17 UTC
How can I test SURBL is working
Hi,
I have
1) [root@beyond ~]# rpm -q caching-nameserver
caching-nameserver-7.3-3
2) Net::DNS is up to date.
3) /usr/bin/perl -T -w /usr/bin/spamd -L -x -u vpopmail
Running on FC4 with SpamAssassin 3.10, init.pre has
loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
How do i test SA is running with SURBL. I dont see any hit on any email
since the day(6 months now) i had installed SA.
Best regards
Re: How can I test SURBL is working
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 12:33:34PM +0800, List wrote:
> Tried without -L . It yes and i works. Does that means i have to change
> from /usr/bin/spamd -L -x -u vpopmail to /usr/bin/spamd -x -u vpopmail ?
If you want network tests, such as SURBL, to be enabled, yes.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"A Young Eel is called this." - Jeopardy Question
"What is a baby eel Alex." - Theo's Response
Re: How can I test SURBL is working
Posted by List <li...@nchost.net>.
>So you want to run without network checks (-L) to find out if a network
>test
>will return a hit?
Tried without -L . It yes and i works. Does that means i have to change from
/usr/bin/spamd -L -x -u vpopmail to /usr/bin/spamd -x -u vpopmail ?
Content preview: http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com [...]
Content analysis details: (9.8 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
3.4 URIBL_JP_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the JP SURBL blocklist
[URIs: surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com]
3.3 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL blocklist
[URIs: surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com]
2.2 URIBL_PH_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the PH SURBL blocklist
[URIs: surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com]
3.0 URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
[URIs: surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com]
1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist
[URIs: surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com]
2.6 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist
[URIs: surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com]
3.6 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist
[URIs: surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com]
-9.8 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
Re: How can I test SURBL is working
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 11:56:49AM +0800, List wrote:
> Saved it to testsurbl. Did a spamassassin -D -L < testsurbl and the result
[...]
> Any insight?
So you want to run without network checks (-L) to find out if a network test
will return a hit?
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"Minix is one of the reasons I decided microkernels are bad. VMS is the
reason I decided VMS is bad." - Linus Torvalds
Re: How can I test SURBL is working
Posted by List <li...@nchost.net>.
> This message should fire them off
>
> http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com
I create a text with the following
Return-Path: <tb...@world.std.com>
Delivered-To: foo@foo.com
Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20])
by mail.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392E1114061
for <fo...@foo.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:34:46 +0000 (Eire)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <v0421010eb70653b14e06@[208.192.102.193]>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2001 16:59:58 -0400
To: tbtf@world.std.com
From: Keith Dawson <da...@world.std.com>
Subject: TBTF ping for 2001-04-20: Reviving
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: tbtf-approval@world.std.com
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tbtf-approval@europe.std.com
http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com
Saved it to testsurbl. Did a spamassassin -D -L < testsurbl and the result
:-
[5542] dbg: check:
subtests=__CT,__CTYPE_CHARSET_QUOTED,__CT_TEXT_PLAIN,__HAS_MSGID,__HAS_RCVD,__HAS_SUBJECT,__LOCAL_PP_NONPPURL,__MIME_VERSION,__NONEMPTY_BODY,__SANE_MSGID,__SARE_HEAD_MIME_VALID,__SARE_URI_ANY,__TOCC_EXISTS,__UNUSABLE_MSGID
Return-Path: <tb...@world.std.com>
X-Spam-DCC:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on ns1.domain.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=ham
version=3.1.0
Delivered-To: foo@foo.com
Received: from europe.std.com (europe.std.com [199.172.62.20])
by mail.netnoteinc.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392E1114061
for <fo...@foo.com>; Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:34:46 +0000 (Eire)
Any insight?
Thanks
Re: How can I test SURBL is working
Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@comcast.net>.
This message should fire them off
http://surbl-org-permanent-test-point.com
At 10:20 PM 11/20/2005, List wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I have
>
>1) [root@beyond ~]# rpm -q caching-nameserver
> caching-nameserver-7.3-3
>
>2) Net::DNS is up to date.
>
>3) /usr/bin/perl -T -w /usr/bin/spamd -L -x -u vpopmail
>
>Running on FC4 with SpamAssassin 3.10, init.pre has
>
>loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::URIDNSBL
>
>How do i test SA is running with SURBL. I dont see any hit on any email
>since the day(6 months now) i had installed SA.
>
>Best regards