You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/06/24 08:44:28 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29780] - Why we need a jkMain static attibute?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29780>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29780

Why we need a jkMain static attibute?

william.barker@wilshire.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|Normal                      |Minor



------- Additional Comments From william.barker@wilshire.com  2004-06-24 06:44 -------
Among all of the little cleanups that can be done for the JK Connector, this 
has to be one of the smallest ;-).

The design of the JK Connector is that you only ever need one.  And since you 
can't specify the 'jk2.properties' file for the Connector, you are limited to 
only the simplest setups if you define more than one.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tomcat-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tomcat-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org