You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2014/09/17 17:35:27 UTC
[Bug 7084] T_SMF_FM_FORGED_REPLYTO and FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO seem
identical.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7084
--- Comment #1 from AXB <ax...@gmail.com> ---
seem but they're not
# Test potential error in base rules
header __freemail_hdr_replyto eval:check_freemail_header('Reply-To:addr')
meta SMF_FM_FORGED_REPLYTO __freemail_hdr_replyto && !FREEMAIL_FROM &&
!__freemail_safe
describe SMF_FM_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
score SMF_FM_FORGED_REPLYTO 0.1
# Idea from John Hardin
header __freemail_hdr_replyto eval:check_freemail_header('Reply-To')
meta FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO __freemail_hdr_replyto && !FREEMAIL_FROM &&
!__freemail_safe
describe FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO Freemail in Reply-To, but not From
score FREEMAIL_FORGED_REPLYTO 0.1
Reply-To versus Reply-To:addr
both scored 0.1 so not major issue
I don't see SMF_FM_FORGED_REPLYTO being published in the latest update
wonder how you got the T_SMF_FM_FORGED_REPLYTO rule
Have you run sa-update recently?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.