You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> on 2016/01/11 22:02:33 UTC
Re: [FalconJX] Is it time to delete the FalconJS code?
Does anybody have an actual set of steps to create some sort of archival
branch or can I just delete this project?
-Alex
On 12/21/15, 7:50 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Well garbage is relative. I didn't mean it in a derogatory way, only that
>the original authors were the ones that could understand it.
>
>As far as FlaconJX, I wrote that as a prototype based off of my prior
>experience with AST traversing and the visitor pattern. That was almost 3
>years ago now so as far as it actually getting refactored on an
>application
>level with compilation unit passes, it never happened! :)
>
>When iw rote the front and backend I was more using the Flex compiler as a
>template, and was slowing digesting how the multithreaded compilation
>worked in Falcon.
>
>It that compiler was a full time/part time paid job for myself I could
>easily put time into actually optimizing and documenting how the
>compiler(Falcon) end actually runs. But that is not the case so we have to
>guess right now what actually could be changed.
>
>Besides, my solution was just one and there may be other ways that the
>compiler could transpile as to js way faster but it's what I knew at the
>time and had already done it in a few other projects.
>
>Mike
>
>On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> @Harbs,
>>
>> I don't know enough about Git and branching to know if this is the right
>> way to "archive" stuff before deleting, but I would think that branch
>> would need special handling after it is created because any attempt to
>> merge with that branch might result in the deletion of that code.
>>
>> @Mark & Mike,
>>
>> Where would you create such an archive folder such that it doesn't show
>>up
>> when grep-ing the code? IMO, that's the goal: on GitHub and locally, I
>> don't want these files to be found by search tools.
>>
>> @Mike,
>>
>> I would caution against calling that code base "garbage". It worked
>>well
>> enough to produce the early prototypes, and you never know when we might
>> want to seek the advice and participation of its author. Yeah, some
>>parts
>> of it were really hard to learn, but it did do things that I had to go
>>fix
>> again in FalconJX, and I think FalconJX still runs several of the phases
>> of the CompilationUnit code that we may need to stop doing some day for
>> performance reasons and go through another round of bug fixing when we
>>do,
>> because semantic errors seem to be caught during reduction. FalconJS
>>was
>> leveraging the CompilationUnit phases.
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>> On 12/21/15, 3:27 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Yup, I agree, it doesn't really need to be deleted but it needs to be
>>so
>> >far away from FalconJX that a common dev wouldn't mistake it for
>>anything
>> >other than archived history.
>> >
>> >The code is garbage, another reason why FalconJX even exists, I hated
>>that
>> >code with a passion. :)
>> >
>> >Mike
>> >
>> >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J <
>> >mark.kessler.ctr@usmc.mil> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Might as well make an archive folder that's generic and we can put
>> >> anything else we want to keep but don't want in the main source
>>areas.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> -Mark
>> >>
>>
>>
Re: [FalconJX] Is it time to delete the FalconJS code?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
I will probably just tag the repo unless someone speaks up really wanting
a branch.
-Alex
On 1/11/16, 1:45 PM, "Andy Dufilie" <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Setting a tag seems like the best way.
>
>git tag mytagname
>git push origin mytagname
>
>then do whatever you want.
>
>On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:10 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
><bi...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> Maybe this will work (based on this stackoverflow answer [1])
>>
>> 1. Move the code to its own branch.
>>
>> 2. Then tag the branch:
>> git tag archive/<branchname> <branchname>
>>
>> 3. Then delete the branch
>> git branch -d <branchname>
>>
>> To restore the branch:
>>
>> git checkout -b <branchname> archive/<branchname>
>>
>>
>>http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1307114/how-can-i-archive-git-branches
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Michael Schmalle <
>> teotigraphixllc@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > Can't you just create a tag like "Last know existence of FalconJS"
>>commit
>> > then delete. Or were other people saying they still wanted to code
>> > somewhere, seems to me that was some of the conversation.
>> >
>> > Mike
>> >
>> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Does anybody have an actual set of steps to create some sort of
>> archival
>> > > branch or can I just delete this project?
>> > >
>> > > -Alex
>> > >
>> > > On 12/21/15, 7:50 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >Well garbage is relative. I didn't mean it in a derogatory way,
>>only
>> > that
>> > > >the original authors were the ones that could understand it.
>> > > >
>> > > >As far as FlaconJX, I wrote that as a prototype based off of my
>>prior
>> > > >experience with AST traversing and the visitor pattern. That was
>> almost
>> > 3
>> > > >years ago now so as far as it actually getting refactored on an
>> > > >application
>> > > >level with compilation unit passes, it never happened! :)
>> > > >
>> > > >When iw rote the front and backend I was more using the Flex
>>compiler
>> > as a
>> > > >template, and was slowing digesting how the multithreaded
>>compilation
>> > > >worked in Falcon.
>> > > >
>> > > >It that compiler was a full time/part time paid job for myself I
>>could
>> > > >easily put time into actually optimizing and documenting how the
>> > > >compiler(Falcon) end actually runs. But that is not the case so we
>> have
>> > to
>> > > >guess right now what actually could be changed.
>> > > >
>> > > >Besides, my solution was just one and there may be other ways that
>>the
>> > > >compiler could transpile as to js way faster but it's what I knew
>>at
>> the
>> > > >time and had already done it in a few other projects.
>> > > >
>> > > >Mike
>> > > >
>> > > >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> @Harbs,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I don't know enough about Git and branching to know if this is
>>the
>> > right
>> > > >> way to "archive" stuff before deleting, but I would think that
>> branch
>> > > >> would need special handling after it is created because any
>>attempt
>> to
>> > > >> merge with that branch might result in the deletion of that code.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> @Mark & Mike,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Where would you create such an archive folder such that it
>>doesn't
>> > show
>> > > >>up
>> > > >> when grep-ing the code? IMO, that's the goal: on GitHub and
>> locally,
>> > I
>> > > >> don't want these files to be found by search tools.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> @Mike,
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I would caution against calling that code base "garbage". It
>>worked
>> > > >>well
>> > > >> enough to produce the early prototypes, and you never know when
>>we
>> > might
>> > > >> want to seek the advice and participation of its author. Yeah,
>>some
>> > > >>parts
>> > > >> of it were really hard to learn, but it did do things that I had
>>to
>> go
>> > > >>fix
>> > > >> again in FalconJX, and I think FalconJX still runs several of the
>> > phases
>> > > >> of the CompilationUnit code that we may need to stop doing some
>>day
>> > for
>> > > >> performance reasons and go through another round of bug fixing
>>when
>> we
>> > > >>do,
>> > > >> because semantic errors seem to be caught during reduction.
>> FalconJS
>> > > >>was
>> > > >> leveraging the CompilationUnit phases.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> -Alex
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On 12/21/15, 3:27 AM, "Michael Schmalle"
>><teotigraphixllc@gmail.com
>> >
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> >Yup, I agree, it doesn't really need to be deleted but it needs
>>to
>> be
>> > > >>so
>> > > >> >far away from FalconJX that a common dev wouldn't mistake it for
>> > > >>anything
>> > > >> >other than archived history.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >The code is garbage, another reason why FalconJX even exists, I
>> hated
>> > > >>that
>> > > >> >code with a passion. :)
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >Mike
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J <
>> > > >> >mark.kessler.ctr@usmc.mil> wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> >> Might as well make an archive folder that's generic and we can
>> put
>> > > >> >> anything else we want to keep but don't want in the main
>>source
>> > > >>areas.
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >> >> -Mark
>> > > >> >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
Re: [FalconJX] Is it time to delete the FalconJS code?
Posted by Andy Dufilie <an...@gmail.com>.
Setting a tag seems like the best way.
git tag mytagname
git push origin mytagname
then do whatever you want.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:10 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Maybe this will work (based on this stackoverflow answer [1])
>
> 1. Move the code to its own branch.
>
> 2. Then tag the branch:
> git tag archive/<branchname> <branchname>
>
> 3. Then delete the branch
> git branch -d <branchname>
>
> To restore the branch:
>
> git checkout -b <branchname> archive/<branchname>
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1307114/how-can-i-archive-git-branches
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Michael Schmalle <
> teotigraphixllc@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Can't you just create a tag like "Last know existence of FalconJS" commit
> > then delete. Or were other people saying they still wanted to code
> > somewhere, seems to me that was some of the conversation.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Does anybody have an actual set of steps to create some sort of
> archival
> > > branch or can I just delete this project?
> > >
> > > -Alex
> > >
> > > On 12/21/15, 7:50 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > >Well garbage is relative. I didn't mean it in a derogatory way, only
> > that
> > > >the original authors were the ones that could understand it.
> > > >
> > > >As far as FlaconJX, I wrote that as a prototype based off of my prior
> > > >experience with AST traversing and the visitor pattern. That was
> almost
> > 3
> > > >years ago now so as far as it actually getting refactored on an
> > > >application
> > > >level with compilation unit passes, it never happened! :)
> > > >
> > > >When iw rote the front and backend I was more using the Flex compiler
> > as a
> > > >template, and was slowing digesting how the multithreaded compilation
> > > >worked in Falcon.
> > > >
> > > >It that compiler was a full time/part time paid job for myself I could
> > > >easily put time into actually optimizing and documenting how the
> > > >compiler(Falcon) end actually runs. But that is not the case so we
> have
> > to
> > > >guess right now what actually could be changed.
> > > >
> > > >Besides, my solution was just one and there may be other ways that the
> > > >compiler could transpile as to js way faster but it's what I knew at
> the
> > > >time and had already done it in a few other projects.
> > > >
> > > >Mike
> > > >
> > > >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> @Harbs,
> > > >>
> > > >> I don't know enough about Git and branching to know if this is the
> > right
> > > >> way to "archive" stuff before deleting, but I would think that
> branch
> > > >> would need special handling after it is created because any attempt
> to
> > > >> merge with that branch might result in the deletion of that code.
> > > >>
> > > >> @Mark & Mike,
> > > >>
> > > >> Where would you create such an archive folder such that it doesn't
> > show
> > > >>up
> > > >> when grep-ing the code? IMO, that's the goal: on GitHub and
> locally,
> > I
> > > >> don't want these files to be found by search tools.
> > > >>
> > > >> @Mike,
> > > >>
> > > >> I would caution against calling that code base "garbage". It worked
> > > >>well
> > > >> enough to produce the early prototypes, and you never know when we
> > might
> > > >> want to seek the advice and participation of its author. Yeah, some
> > > >>parts
> > > >> of it were really hard to learn, but it did do things that I had to
> go
> > > >>fix
> > > >> again in FalconJX, and I think FalconJX still runs several of the
> > phases
> > > >> of the CompilationUnit code that we may need to stop doing some day
> > for
> > > >> performance reasons and go through another round of bug fixing when
> we
> > > >>do,
> > > >> because semantic errors seem to be caught during reduction.
> FalconJS
> > > >>was
> > > >> leveraging the CompilationUnit phases.
> > > >>
> > > >> -Alex
> > > >>
> > > >> On 12/21/15, 3:27 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <teotigraphixllc@gmail.com
> >
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> >Yup, I agree, it doesn't really need to be deleted but it needs to
> be
> > > >>so
> > > >> >far away from FalconJX that a common dev wouldn't mistake it for
> > > >>anything
> > > >> >other than archived history.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >The code is garbage, another reason why FalconJX even exists, I
> hated
> > > >>that
> > > >> >code with a passion. :)
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Mike
> > > >> >
> > > >> >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J <
> > > >> >mark.kessler.ctr@usmc.mil> wrote:
> > > >> >
> > > >> >> Might as well make an archive folder that's generic and we can
> put
> > > >> >> anything else we want to keep but don't want in the main source
> > > >>areas.
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >>
> > > >> >> -Mark
> > > >> >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [FalconJX] Is it time to delete the FalconJS code?
Posted by OmPrakash Muppirala <bi...@gmail.com>.
Maybe this will work (based on this stackoverflow answer [1])
1. Move the code to its own branch.
2. Then tag the branch:
git tag archive/<branchname> <branchname>
3. Then delete the branch
git branch -d <branchname>
To restore the branch:
git checkout -b <branchname> archive/<branchname>
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1307114/how-can-i-archive-git-branches
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Michael Schmalle <teotigraphixllc@gmail.com
> wrote:
> Can't you just create a tag like "Last know existence of FalconJS" commit
> then delete. Or were other people saying they still wanted to code
> somewhere, seems to me that was some of the conversation.
>
> Mike
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> > Does anybody have an actual set of steps to create some sort of archival
> > branch or can I just delete this project?
> >
> > -Alex
> >
> > On 12/21/15, 7:50 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >Well garbage is relative. I didn't mean it in a derogatory way, only
> that
> > >the original authors were the ones that could understand it.
> > >
> > >As far as FlaconJX, I wrote that as a prototype based off of my prior
> > >experience with AST traversing and the visitor pattern. That was almost
> 3
> > >years ago now so as far as it actually getting refactored on an
> > >application
> > >level with compilation unit passes, it never happened! :)
> > >
> > >When iw rote the front and backend I was more using the Flex compiler
> as a
> > >template, and was slowing digesting how the multithreaded compilation
> > >worked in Falcon.
> > >
> > >It that compiler was a full time/part time paid job for myself I could
> > >easily put time into actually optimizing and documenting how the
> > >compiler(Falcon) end actually runs. But that is not the case so we have
> to
> > >guess right now what actually could be changed.
> > >
> > >Besides, my solution was just one and there may be other ways that the
> > >compiler could transpile as to js way faster but it's what I knew at the
> > >time and had already done it in a few other projects.
> > >
> > >Mike
> > >
> > >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> @Harbs,
> > >>
> > >> I don't know enough about Git and branching to know if this is the
> right
> > >> way to "archive" stuff before deleting, but I would think that branch
> > >> would need special handling after it is created because any attempt to
> > >> merge with that branch might result in the deletion of that code.
> > >>
> > >> @Mark & Mike,
> > >>
> > >> Where would you create such an archive folder such that it doesn't
> show
> > >>up
> > >> when grep-ing the code? IMO, that's the goal: on GitHub and locally,
> I
> > >> don't want these files to be found by search tools.
> > >>
> > >> @Mike,
> > >>
> > >> I would caution against calling that code base "garbage". It worked
> > >>well
> > >> enough to produce the early prototypes, and you never know when we
> might
> > >> want to seek the advice and participation of its author. Yeah, some
> > >>parts
> > >> of it were really hard to learn, but it did do things that I had to go
> > >>fix
> > >> again in FalconJX, and I think FalconJX still runs several of the
> phases
> > >> of the CompilationUnit code that we may need to stop doing some day
> for
> > >> performance reasons and go through another round of bug fixing when we
> > >>do,
> > >> because semantic errors seem to be caught during reduction. FalconJS
> > >>was
> > >> leveraging the CompilationUnit phases.
> > >>
> > >> -Alex
> > >>
> > >> On 12/21/15, 3:27 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >Yup, I agree, it doesn't really need to be deleted but it needs to be
> > >>so
> > >> >far away from FalconJX that a common dev wouldn't mistake it for
> > >>anything
> > >> >other than archived history.
> > >> >
> > >> >The code is garbage, another reason why FalconJX even exists, I hated
> > >>that
> > >> >code with a passion. :)
> > >> >
> > >> >Mike
> > >> >
> > >> >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J <
> > >> >mark.kessler.ctr@usmc.mil> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> >> Might as well make an archive folder that's generic and we can put
> > >> >> anything else we want to keep but don't want in the main source
> > >>areas.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -Mark
> > >> >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
>
Re: [FalconJX] Is it time to delete the FalconJS code?
Posted by Michael Schmalle <te...@gmail.com>.
Can't you just create a tag like "Last know existence of FalconJS" commit
then delete. Or were other people saying they still wanted to code
somewhere, seems to me that was some of the conversation.
Mike
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> Does anybody have an actual set of steps to create some sort of archival
> branch or can I just delete this project?
>
> -Alex
>
> On 12/21/15, 7:50 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Well garbage is relative. I didn't mean it in a derogatory way, only that
> >the original authors were the ones that could understand it.
> >
> >As far as FlaconJX, I wrote that as a prototype based off of my prior
> >experience with AST traversing and the visitor pattern. That was almost 3
> >years ago now so as far as it actually getting refactored on an
> >application
> >level with compilation unit passes, it never happened! :)
> >
> >When iw rote the front and backend I was more using the Flex compiler as a
> >template, and was slowing digesting how the multithreaded compilation
> >worked in Falcon.
> >
> >It that compiler was a full time/part time paid job for myself I could
> >easily put time into actually optimizing and documenting how the
> >compiler(Falcon) end actually runs. But that is not the case so we have to
> >guess right now what actually could be changed.
> >
> >Besides, my solution was just one and there may be other ways that the
> >compiler could transpile as to js way faster but it's what I knew at the
> >time and had already done it in a few other projects.
> >
> >Mike
> >
> >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> @Harbs,
> >>
> >> I don't know enough about Git and branching to know if this is the right
> >> way to "archive" stuff before deleting, but I would think that branch
> >> would need special handling after it is created because any attempt to
> >> merge with that branch might result in the deletion of that code.
> >>
> >> @Mark & Mike,
> >>
> >> Where would you create such an archive folder such that it doesn't show
> >>up
> >> when grep-ing the code? IMO, that's the goal: on GitHub and locally, I
> >> don't want these files to be found by search tools.
> >>
> >> @Mike,
> >>
> >> I would caution against calling that code base "garbage". It worked
> >>well
> >> enough to produce the early prototypes, and you never know when we might
> >> want to seek the advice and participation of its author. Yeah, some
> >>parts
> >> of it were really hard to learn, but it did do things that I had to go
> >>fix
> >> again in FalconJX, and I think FalconJX still runs several of the phases
> >> of the CompilationUnit code that we may need to stop doing some day for
> >> performance reasons and go through another round of bug fixing when we
> >>do,
> >> because semantic errors seem to be caught during reduction. FalconJS
> >>was
> >> leveraging the CompilationUnit phases.
> >>
> >> -Alex
> >>
> >> On 12/21/15, 3:27 AM, "Michael Schmalle" <te...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Yup, I agree, it doesn't really need to be deleted but it needs to be
> >>so
> >> >far away from FalconJX that a common dev wouldn't mistake it for
> >>anything
> >> >other than archived history.
> >> >
> >> >The code is garbage, another reason why FalconJX even exists, I hated
> >>that
> >> >code with a passion. :)
> >> >
> >> >Mike
> >> >
> >> >On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:03 AM, Kessler CTR Mark J <
> >> >mark.kessler.ctr@usmc.mil> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Might as well make an archive folder that's generic and we can put
> >> >> anything else we want to keep but don't want in the main source
> >>areas.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> -Mark
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>