You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by "Simon Laws (JIRA)" <de...@tuscany.apache.org> on 2009/10/21 18:25:59 UTC
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-3312) Potential memory leak in Java
interface handling
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12768313#action_12768313 ]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3312:
-------------------------------------
The same sort of pattern occurs in
JavaElementImpl
DataTypeImpl
SCAProxy
So am about to check in fixes for those also
> Potential memory leak in Java interface handling
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-3312
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3312
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java SCA Java Implementation Extension
> Affects Versions: Java-SCA-1.5.1
> Environment: All
> Reporter: Simon Laws
> Assignee: Simon Laws
> Fix For: Java-SCA-1.5.2
>
>
> In JavaInterfaceFactoryImpl there's a cache....
> private Map<Class<?>, JavaInterface> cache = Collections.synchronizedMap(new WeakHashMap<Class<?>, JavaInterface>());
> But
> public class JavaInterfaceImpl extends InterfaceImpl implements JavaInterface {
> private String className;
> private Class<?> javaClass;
> So it seems that Class<?> javaClass; should really be a weak reference
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.