[jira] [Comment Edited] (CLOUDSTACK-3219) Allow ports other than 80,443 and 8080 in Register Template URL.

["chris snow (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13960462#comment-13960462 ] 

chris snow edited comment on CLOUDSTACK-3219 at 4/5/14 6:53 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

On a development environment where I have xen, xapi and cloudstack running in jetty, all of the allowed ports are already used up.  It would be good if there was someway to disable this check so I can run a local web server (e.g. python -m SimpleHTTPServer 8888) for serving templates.


was (Author: snowch):
On a development environment where I have xen, xapi and cloudstack running in jetty, all of the allowed ports are already used up.  It would be good if there was someway to disable this check so I can run a local web server (e.g. python -m SimpleHTTPServer 8888) for serving templates without having to comment out the port verification code in UriUtils.java

> Allow ports other than 80,443 and 8080 in Register Template URL.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-3219
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3219
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the default.) 
>            Reporter: Thomas O'Dowd
>
> I'd like to be able to download templates from our object store server which is using port 18080. Currently I have to choose port 8080 and forward port 8080 to 18080 on our object store server which is not so good. Is there any reason to limit the ports and if not, can we open them up.
> Currently, if I give port 18080, I get the following pop-up error:
>        "Only ports 80, 8080 and 443 are allowed"



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)