You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Dmytro Molkov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/05/14 18:32:45 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (HADOOP-6469) Multiple RPC Servers using same object instance

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6469?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dmytro Molkov resolved HADOOP-6469.
-----------------------------------

    Resolution: Not A Problem

I will close this one since I already solved HDFS-599 by simply using the server's address to find out where the request is coming from.
If anyone feels like this functionality should be in there please reopen.

> Multiple RPC Servers using same object instance
> -----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-6469
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-6469
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Dmytro Molkov
>            Assignee: Dmytro Molkov
>
> In HDFS-599 we want to be able to run multiple RPC servers on the namenode. One for DataNodes another for the rest of the protocols.
> The problem right now is that checking if the protocol is exposed is done on the handler side (the NameNode in our case).
> In our usecase we want to be able to tell if the request is coming on the "datanode port" or "the rest port" and based on that throw an exception when datanodes are accessing the client port and vice versa. Since the JobTracker has the same abstraction of Clients and Slaves those might later also be split on to different servers. So creating a solution just inside of the NameNode is not really an options, especially since we could not come up with one that would be clean and safe.
> The proposal is to have RPC servers have "tags" associated with them in these cases. Then in the NameNode 2 servers created will have tags "DataNodeServer" and "ClientAdminServer". Another change is instead of using VersionedProtocol to check the version and the protocol in the getProtocolVersion method, Classes that can be used in multiple contexts should implement another interface (MultiServer?) that will have a checkProtocol? method that receives the name of the protocol and the Tag associated with the Server that received the request. This way in the checkProtocol we can specify which Protocols are allowed for servers tagged with Tag.
> What do people think?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.