You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Uwe Schindler (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/06/03 09:33:01 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (SOLR-6130) solr-cell dependencies weren't fully
upgraded with the Tika 1.4->1.5 upgrade
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14016294#comment-14016294 ]
Uwe Schindler commented on SOLR-6130:
-------------------------------------
In my opinion, support for .class file metadata in an solr idex is not really a use-case. It is an option for TIKA to extract metadata from class files, but for sure not really useful for the average user.
I still think: If we bundle TIKA, we should just include those parsers that are usefull for fulltext search. ASM is a very bad dependency, because every major version has significant changes in public classes, which make the jars incompatible to each other. A lot of projects use ASM and so classpath issues are very likely. I had lots of customers complaining that Maven pulled ASM for them in this old version.
For this reason, forbidden-apis rewrites package names of ASM before bundling. Forbidden uses ASM 5 already, so 4.1 is also outdated (and incompatible to Java 8).
> solr-cell dependencies weren't fully upgraded with the Tika 1.4->1.5 upgrade
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6130
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6130
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.8
> Reporter: Steve Rowe
> Assignee: Steve Rowe
> Fix For: 4.9, 5.0, 4.8.2
>
>
> There are problems with the solr-cell dependency configuration:
> # Despite the fact that the asm:asm dependency was removed in LUCENE-4263, and re-addition effectively vetoed by Uwe/Robert in SOLR-4209, asm:asm:3.1 was re-added with no apparent discussion by SOLR-1301 in Solr 4.7.
> # The Tika 1.5 upgrade (SOLR-5763) failed to properly upgrade the asm:asm:3.1 dependency to org.ow2.asm:asm-debug-all:4.1 (see TIKA-1053).
> # New Tika dependency com.uwyn:jhighlight:1.0 was not added.
> [~thetaphi], do you have any opinions on the asm issues? In particular, would it make sense to have an additional asm dependency (asm-debug-all in addition to asm)?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org