You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@mxnet.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2018/06/14 17:50:45 UTC

[GitHub] anirudh2290 closed pull request #11216: Scala inference memory leak fix #11204

anirudh2290 closed pull request #11216: Scala inference memory leak fix #11204
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/11216
 
 
   

This is a PR merged from a forked repository.
As GitHub hides the original diff on merge, it is displayed below for
the sake of provenance:

As this is a foreign pull request (from a fork), the diff is supplied
below (as it won't show otherwise due to GitHub magic):

diff --git a/scala-package/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/mxnet/FeedForward.scala b/scala-package/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/mxnet/FeedForward.scala
index 7289df19712..87c9bc72be0 100644
--- a/scala-package/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/mxnet/FeedForward.scala
+++ b/scala-package/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/mxnet/FeedForward.scala
@@ -224,13 +224,24 @@ class FeedForward private(
     var i = 0
     while (data.hasNext && i != numBatch) {
       val batch = data.next()
-      i += 1
-      ExecutorManager.loadData(batch, dataArrays)
-      predExec.forward(isTrain = false)
-      val padded = batch.pad
-      val realSize = batchSize - padded
-      for ((list, nd) <- outputs zip predExec.outputs) {
-        list += nd.slice(0, realSize).copy()
+      try {
+        i += 1
+        ExecutorManager.loadData(batch, dataArrays)
+        predExec.forward(isTrain = false)
+        val padded = batch.pad
+        val realSize = batchSize - padded
+        for ((list, nd) <- outputs zip predExec.outputs) {
+          // The slice is being written to a value so that dispose can be called after the copy.
+          // The one liner nd.slice().copy() leads to leaking the memory of the slice.
+          val ndSliced = nd.slice(0, realSize)
+          try {
+            list += ndSliced.copy()
+          } finally {
+            ndSliced.dispose()
+          }
+        }
+      } finally {
+        batch.dispose()
       }
     }
     // TODO(Yizhi): we can use Symbol.concat to do the same thing. Can it be more efficient?


 

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services