You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Vladimir Ozerov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/11/14 19:00:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (IGNITE-9786) MVCC: simplify TX wait list
management
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16686486#comment-16686486 ]
Vladimir Ozerov edited comment on IGNITE-9786 at 11/14/18 6:59 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Re-merged with master, re-run tests to get visa: https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewQueued.html?itemId=2319430
was (Author: vozerov):
Re-merged with master, re-run tests to get visa: https://ci.ignite.apache.org/viewQueued.html?itemId=2317118
> MVCC: simplify TX wait list management
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-9786
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-9786
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: mvcc
> Reporter: Vladimir Ozerov
> Assignee: Vladimir Ozerov
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.8
>
>
> It seems that instead of having a lot of classes and complex synchronization mechanics for MvccProcessorImpl.waitMap, we can use single wrapper with a list of waiters.
> Resulting code will be much more simpler and less prone to concurrency issues.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)