Re: Providing support for subscribing for different photo album streams (PHOTARK-18 and PHOTARK-19)

[Avdhesh Yadav <av...@avdheshyadav.com>]

Hi,

I think you have older code..Please get the latest code and build and
redeploy again..

On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 10:14 AM, thilanka geeganage
<lg...@yahoo.com>wrote:

> HI ,
>      Thanks for providing these information. when I tried to upload files
> using http://localhost:8080/photark/admin/upload.htmlit doesn't show the
> name of previously created albums at the admin UI. Instead of that it shows
> [object Object] name at the select album drop down list. The number of names
> are equal in both cases.
> So what is this problem at the upload UI. Can you help me on that.
> Regards,Thilanka.
> --- On Wed, 3/3/10, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Providing support for subscribing for different photo album
> streams  (PHOTARK-18 and PHOTARK-19)
> To: photark-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, March 3, 2010, 8:50 AM
>
> In our previous release, we had the ability to subscribe/reference to
> external photos using Tuscany references (see composite below)
> Although that works fine, the user experience is not so dynamic, as
> the user needs to update the composite and then re-deploy the
> application.
>
>     <component name="AlbumAgregator">
>         <implementation.java class="services.AlbumAgregator"/>
>         <service name="Album">
>             <t:binding.jsonrpc/>
>            </service>
>         <reference name="album" target="Album"/>
>         <reference name="albumFeed">
>            <t:binding.atom
> uri="
> http://api.flickr.com/services/feeds/photoset.gne?set=72157601530865813&nsid=36437931@N00&lang=en-us
> "/>
>         </reference>
>     </component>
>
>
> Going forward, I would like to have a more flexible user experience
> here, where a user could go to the admin ui and create a new album of
> type subscription and provided the right URL for the remote album. In
> order to have this user experience working, we will need to provide
> local album implementations that would provide similar functionality
> offered by the Tuscany ATOM, GDATA bindings and would understand the
> formats of the external feeds to extract album/image information from
> it. This is the ideas I had when I created photark-18 and photark-19
> jiras and I guess that, them combined (with possible other album
> types) + plus support for admin ui could be a great GSoC project.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende>
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Avdhesh Yadav
http://www.avdheshyadav.com