Re: Disable PMD in PRs

[Otavio Rodolfo Piske <an...@gmail.com>]

I noticed that the annotations are still there. I will remove those today.

On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 2:19 PM Otavio Rodolfo Piske <an...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> BTW,
>
> re-analyzing did not seem to have any effect. Therefore, if you notice
> that annotations remain there, please let me know and I'll take a look.
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:17 PM Otavio Rodolfo Piske <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I removed the annotations on the PRs. It will remain on the existing ones
>> unless they are re-analyzed AFAIK, but future PRs should not have it.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 1:10 PM Otavio Rodolfo Piske <
>> angusyoung@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, yeah, this is too verbose. I'll take a pause on the resume work to
>>> take a look at this.
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 10:49 AM Zheng Feng <zf...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 to disable PMD checks or is it possible to exclude the generated
>>>> classes
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 5:24 PM Claus Ibsen <cl...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Hi
>>>> >
>>>> > When reviewing PRs then they are now very very long due to PMD checks
>>>> > reporting a ton of stuff that is not relevant - such as in the source
>>>> > code generated classes and much more.
>>>> >
>>>> > Either we should disable it, or find a way to make it "not shown" and
>>>> > that you can click a button or something to see the PMD if you want
>>>> > to.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Claus Ibsen
>>>> > -----------------
>>>> > http://davsclaus.com @davsclaus
>>>> > Camel in Action 2: https://www.manning.com/ibsen2
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Otavio R. Piske
>>> http://orpiske.net
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Otavio R. Piske
>> http://orpiske.net
>>
>
>
> --
> Otavio R. Piske
> http://orpiske.net
>


-- 
Otavio R. Piske
http://orpiske.net