You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by markap14 <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2018/06/01 14:23:47 UTC

[GitHub] nifi pull request #2752: NIFI-5241: Updated EventSumValue to use synchronize...

GitHub user markap14 opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2752

    NIFI-5241: Updated EventSumValue to use synchronized methods instead …

    …of many atomic values. This is more efficient and uses less heap. Also noticed that the Logger instance in ProcessorNode was not used so removed it, and in testing this also noticed that the default connection pool size for OkHttpReplicationClient was only 5, which can cause a lot of unnecessary HTTP connections to be created so adjusted the pool size
    
    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [ ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [ ] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [ ] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically master)?
    
    - [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn -Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/markap14/nifi NIFI-5241

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2752.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2752
    
----
commit 14e5a228650a9995a7b030cc84fe7bf5e639cd93
Author: Mark Payne <ma...@...>
Date:   2018-06-01T14:21:17Z

    NIFI-5241: Updated EventSumValue to use synchronized methods instead of many atomic values. This is more efficient and uses less heap. Also noticed that the Logger instance in ProcessorNode was not used so removed it, and in testing this also noticed that the default connection pool size for OkHttpReplicationClient was only 5, which can cause a lot of unnecessary HTTP connections to be created so adjusted the pool size

----


---

[GitHub] nifi pull request #2752: NIFI-5241: Updated EventSumValue to use synchronize...

Posted by mcgilman <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user mcgilman commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2752#discussion_r193081251
  
    --- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-framework-bundle/nifi-framework/nifi-web/nifi-jetty/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/web/server/JettyServer.java ---
    @@ -689,6 +689,7 @@ private void configureGenericConnector(Server server, HttpConfiguration configur
                     serverConnector.setHost(hostname);
                 }
                 serverConnector.setPort(port);
    +            serverConnector.setIdleTimeout(60000);
    --- End diff --
    
    Assuming these changes are related to the frequency of the automatic browser refresh, should we make this timeout relative to the value configured in `nifi.ui.autorefresh.interval`.


---

[GitHub] nifi issue #2752: NIFI-5241: Updated EventSumValue to use synchronized metho...

Posted by markap14 <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user markap14 commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2752
  
    @mcgilman that's a good call. I pushed a new commit that addresses that. I also rebased against master, since quite a bit has changed, and all still seems to work well.


---

[GitHub] nifi pull request #2752: NIFI-5241: Updated EventSumValue to use synchronize...

Posted by asfgit <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2752


---

[GitHub] nifi issue #2752: NIFI-5241: Updated EventSumValue to use synchronized metho...

Posted by mcgilman <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user mcgilman commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2752
  
    Thanks @markap14! This has been merged to master.


---