You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/09/30 23:19:19 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21921] - [PATCH] Modifications for retrieval of terms

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21921>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21921

[PATCH] Modifications for retrieval of terms





------- Additional Comments From daniel.naber@t-online.de  2004-09-30 21:19 -------
Does making getEnum() public still make sense? PrefixQuery now implements 
rewrite, not getEnum, so this wouldn't help with highlighting (the getPrefix 
method mentioned in this report has been added some time ago, BTW).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: lucene-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: lucene-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org