You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to security-users@xml.apache.org by Erwin van der Koogh <er...@koogh.com> on 2003/12/01 12:19:28 UTC

Re: test

> Berin Lautenbach wrote:
>> test

Got the mail.. but shouldn't it be security-userS@xml.apache.org?

I thought everyone has -users instead of -user.

Erwin


Re: test

Posted by Erwin van der Koogh <vd...@apache.org>.
> <GRIN>.  I realised halfway through - my problem was I have seen it both
> ways in Apache, so I just went the first way I thought of.
>
> I went back to check and it seems to be used interchangeably.  However am
> happy to delete the list and recreate if you think we are better with the
> plural.

I do think we are better off with the plural, but it's probably not worth 
redoing what you just did. Would it be possible to make an alias with the 
plural?

Erwin

Re: test

Posted by Berin Lautenbach <be...@ozemail.com.au>.
<GRIN>.  I realised halfway through - my problem was I have seen it both 
ways in Apache, so I just went the first way I thought of.

I went back to check and it seems to be used interchangeably.  However 
am happy to delete the list and recreate if you think we are better with 
the plural.

Let me know!

Cheers,
	Berin


Erwin van der Koogh wrote:
>> Berin Lautenbach wrote:
>>
>>> test
> 
> 
> Got the mail.. but shouldn't it be security-userS@xml.apache.org?
> 
> I thought everyone has -users instead of -user.
> 
> Erwin
> 
>