You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to security-users@xml.apache.org by Erwin van der Koogh <er...@koogh.com> on 2003/12/01 12:19:28 UTC
Re: test
> Berin Lautenbach wrote:
>> test
Got the mail.. but shouldn't it be security-userS@xml.apache.org?
I thought everyone has -users instead of -user.
Erwin
Re: test
Posted by Erwin van der Koogh <vd...@apache.org>.
> <GRIN>. I realised halfway through - my problem was I have seen it both
> ways in Apache, so I just went the first way I thought of.
>
> I went back to check and it seems to be used interchangeably. However am
> happy to delete the list and recreate if you think we are better with the
> plural.
I do think we are better off with the plural, but it's probably not worth
redoing what you just did. Would it be possible to make an alias with the
plural?
Erwin
Re: test
Posted by Berin Lautenbach <be...@ozemail.com.au>.
<GRIN>. I realised halfway through - my problem was I have seen it both
ways in Apache, so I just went the first way I thought of.
I went back to check and it seems to be used interchangeably. However
am happy to delete the list and recreate if you think we are better with
the plural.
Let me know!
Cheers,
Berin
Erwin van der Koogh wrote:
>> Berin Lautenbach wrote:
>>
>>> test
>
>
> Got the mail.. but shouldn't it be security-userS@xml.apache.org?
>
> I thought everyone has -users instead of -user.
>
> Erwin
>
>