You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@directory.apache.org by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net> on 2011/07/08 10:23:47 UTC
[VOTE] [RESULTS] [ApacheDS] [Studio] Moving compilation target to Java 6
Hi Dev and Users,
It is now time to close this vote.
Here are the results:
- Six +1 binding votes:
- Emmanuel Lécharny
- Kiran Ayyagari
- Alex Karasulu
- Felix Knecht
- Stefan Seelmann
- Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
- One +1 non-binding vote:
- Jim Willeke
- No ±0 or -1 votes
I'm going to update both Apache DS and Studio project pom files.
I will also check our CI builds (if they use Java 5 to compile the projects).
Hopefully, by the end of the day the all CI builds should be back to a green light... :)
Thanks!
Pierre-Arnaud
On 5 juil. 2011, at 09:50, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> Hi Dev and Users,
>
> Following our previous mail threads on the Dev and Notifications MLs [1][2][3], here's a more formal vote on moving our compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory Studio sub-projects of the Apache Directory project.
> I believe it is not necessary to move the Apache LDAP API requirements to Java 6 at the moment.
>
> Please cast your votes:
> [ ] +1 - Move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory Studio sub-projects
> [ ] 0 - Abstain
> [ ] -1 - Do NOT move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory Studio sub-projects
>
> NOTE: The users ML is included in the loop in order to make users aware of our willing to change our JVM compatibility and allow them to give us some feedback (if needed).
>
> Regards,
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
> [1] - http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/directory-notifications/201106.mbox/%3C1233574608.2831308888454913.JavaMail.hudson@aegis%3E
> [2] - http://markmail.org/message/mem5ky3pp2gm35gf
> [3] - http://apache.markmail.org/thread/6crhlt2feqydv6kf
Re: [VOTE] [RESULTS] [ApacheDS] [Studio] Moving compilation target to
Java 6
Posted by Stefan Seelmann <ma...@stefan-seelmann.de>.
Thanks Pierre-Arnaud!
Am 08.07.2011 16:53 schrieb "Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot" <pa...@marcelot.net>:
> Done!
>
> I updated all CI builds that were failing because of the Java 5 issue.
> They're now back to stable.
>
> Regards,
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
>
> On 8 juil. 2011, at 10:23, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>
>> Hi Dev and Users,
>>
>> It is now time to close this vote.
>>
>> Here are the results:
>> - Six +1 binding votes:
>> - Emmanuel Lécharny
>> - Kiran Ayyagari
>> - Alex Karasulu
>> - Felix Knecht
>> - Stefan Seelmann
>> - Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
>> - One +1 non-binding vote:
>> - Jim Willeke
>> - No ±0 or -1 votes
>>
>> I'm going to update both Apache DS and Studio project pom files.
>> I will also check our CI builds (if they use Java 5 to compile the
projects).
>> Hopefully, by the end of the day the all CI builds should be back to a
green light... :)
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Pierre-Arnaud
>>
>>
>> On 5 juil. 2011, at 09:50, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Dev and Users,
>>>
>>> Following our previous mail threads on the Dev and Notifications MLs
[1][2][3], here's a more formal vote on moving our compilation target to
Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory Studio sub-projects of the Apache
Directory project.
>>> I believe it is not necessary to move the Apache LDAP API requirements
to Java 6 at the moment.
>>>
>>> Please cast your votes:
>>> [ ] +1 - Move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache
Directory Studio sub-projects
>>> [ ] 0 - Abstain
>>> [ ] -1 - Do NOT move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and
Apache Directory Studio sub-projects
>>>
>>> NOTE: The users ML is included in the loop in order to make users aware
of our willing to change our JVM compatibility and allow them to give us
some feedback (if needed).
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Pierre-Arnaud
>>>
>>> [1] -
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/directory-notifications/201106.mbox/%3C1233574608.2831308888454913.JavaMail.hudson@aegis%3E
>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/message/mem5ky3pp2gm35gf
>>> [3] - http://apache.markmail.org/thread/6crhlt2feqydv6kf
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULTS] [ApacheDS] [Studio] Moving compilation target to Java 6
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
Done!
I updated all CI builds that were failing because of the Java 5 issue.
They're now back to stable.
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
On 8 juil. 2011, at 10:23, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> Hi Dev and Users,
>
> It is now time to close this vote.
>
> Here are the results:
> - Six +1 binding votes:
> - Emmanuel Lécharny
> - Kiran Ayyagari
> - Alex Karasulu
> - Felix Knecht
> - Stefan Seelmann
> - Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
> - One +1 non-binding vote:
> - Jim Willeke
> - No ±0 or -1 votes
>
> I'm going to update both Apache DS and Studio project pom files.
> I will also check our CI builds (if they use Java 5 to compile the projects).
> Hopefully, by the end of the day the all CI builds should be back to a green light... :)
>
> Thanks!
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
>
> On 5 juil. 2011, at 09:50, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>
>> Hi Dev and Users,
>>
>> Following our previous mail threads on the Dev and Notifications MLs [1][2][3], here's a more formal vote on moving our compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory Studio sub-projects of the Apache Directory project.
>> I believe it is not necessary to move the Apache LDAP API requirements to Java 6 at the moment.
>>
>> Please cast your votes:
>> [ ] +1 - Move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory Studio sub-projects
>> [ ] 0 - Abstain
>> [ ] -1 - Do NOT move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory Studio sub-projects
>>
>> NOTE: The users ML is included in the loop in order to make users aware of our willing to change our JVM compatibility and allow them to give us some feedback (if needed).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pierre-Arnaud
>>
>> [1] - http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/directory-notifications/201106.mbox/%3C1233574608.2831308888454913.JavaMail.hudson@aegis%3E
>> [2] - http://markmail.org/message/mem5ky3pp2gm35gf
>> [3] - http://apache.markmail.org/thread/6crhlt2feqydv6kf
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULTS] [ApacheDS] [Studio] Moving compilation target to Java 6
Posted by Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot <pa...@marcelot.net>.
Done!
I updated all CI builds that were failing because of the Java 5 issue.
They're now back to stable.
Regards,
Pierre-Arnaud
On 8 juil. 2011, at 10:23, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
> Hi Dev and Users,
>
> It is now time to close this vote.
>
> Here are the results:
> - Six +1 binding votes:
> - Emmanuel Lécharny
> - Kiran Ayyagari
> - Alex Karasulu
> - Felix Knecht
> - Stefan Seelmann
> - Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot
> - One +1 non-binding vote:
> - Jim Willeke
> - No ±0 or -1 votes
>
> I'm going to update both Apache DS and Studio project pom files.
> I will also check our CI builds (if they use Java 5 to compile the projects).
> Hopefully, by the end of the day the all CI builds should be back to a green light... :)
>
> Thanks!
> Pierre-Arnaud
>
>
> On 5 juil. 2011, at 09:50, Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot wrote:
>
>> Hi Dev and Users,
>>
>> Following our previous mail threads on the Dev and Notifications MLs [1][2][3], here's a more formal vote on moving our compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory Studio sub-projects of the Apache Directory project.
>> I believe it is not necessary to move the Apache LDAP API requirements to Java 6 at the moment.
>>
>> Please cast your votes:
>> [ ] +1 - Move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory Studio sub-projects
>> [ ] 0 - Abstain
>> [ ] -1 - Do NOT move compilation target to Java 6 for ApacheDS and Apache Directory Studio sub-projects
>>
>> NOTE: The users ML is included in the loop in order to make users aware of our willing to change our JVM compatibility and allow them to give us some feedback (if needed).
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pierre-Arnaud
>>
>> [1] - http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/directory-notifications/201106.mbox/%3C1233574608.2831308888454913.JavaMail.hudson@aegis%3E
>> [2] - http://markmail.org/message/mem5ky3pp2gm35gf
>> [3] - http://apache.markmail.org/thread/6crhlt2feqydv6kf
>