You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net> on 2004/03/09 18:20:10 UTC
1.0.1 preventative measures.
I think it would be a really good idea to ensure that our 1.0.1
candidate tarball is testing on Solaris before release to the public.
I'm suggesting that we solicit volunteers who use Solaris to do this
testing for us -- maybe some of the folks who had problems with the
0.37 and 1.0.0 tarballs? (Grep for "solaris" here:
http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svnusers/archive-2004-02/)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.0.1 preventative measures.
Posted by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>.
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:31:36AM -0800, Ben Reser wrote:
> I plan on trying to at least get a client build done on Solaris. I use
> Solaris. But I've never taken the time to build svn on it in the past.
> I'll see what I can do this time around.
I built a tarball from the 1.0.x branch tonight using my fix for
building the tarballs. I also built the client. It works. :)
If someone wants to get me the release tarball before it goes up I'll be
happy to put it through a make check on Solaris before we release. I'm
not in a position where I can install Apache2 on the machine. But
that's better than nothing. :)
--
Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.0.1 preventative measures.
Posted by Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>.
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:20:10PM -0600, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> I think it would be a really good idea to ensure that our 1.0.1
> candidate tarball is testing on Solaris before release to the public.
> I'm suggesting that we solicit volunteers who use Solaris to do this
> testing for us -- maybe some of the folks who had problems with the
> 0.37 and 1.0.0 tarballs? (Grep for "solaris" here:
> http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svnusers/archive-2004-02/)
I plan on trying to at least get a client build done on Solaris. I use
Solaris. But I've never taken the time to build svn on it in the past.
I'll see what I can do this time around.
--
Ben Reser <be...@reser.org>
http://ben.reser.org
"Conscience is the inner voice which warns us somebody may be looking."
- H.L. Mencken
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.0.1 preventative measures.
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
--On Tuesday, March 9, 2004 12:20 PM -0600 "C. Michael Pilato"
<cm...@collab.net> wrote:
> I think it would be a really good idea to ensure that our 1.0.1
> candidate tarball is testing on Solaris before release to the public.
If you use 1.4.3 from a stock GNU libtool install, it should work.
Nevertheless, yah, I can check it once you post a tarball. Do you have an
ETA for the candidate? ISTR March 12th as being the date. -- justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.0.1 preventative measures.
Posted by Michael Legart <mi...@legart.dk>.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 01:47:10AM -0600, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> > > testing for us -- maybe some of the folks who had problems with the
> > > 0.37 and 1.0.0 tarballs? (Grep for "solaris" here:
> > > http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svnusers/archive-2004-02/)
> >
> > I can do testing on Solaris 7,8,9
>
> Michael, any word on how Subversion 1.0.1 pans out on these platforms?
It looks very good! I have been able to extract the tarball with the tar
shipped with Solaris and it compiles without problems. Only issue for me
is that I have to add --with-berkeley-db=[location] in order for configure
to use Berkeley DB 4.2
Excellent job, thanks!
--
hestdesign.info - we put the hest in .com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.0.1 preventative measures.
Posted by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>.
Michael Legart <mi...@legart.dk> writes:
> C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>
> > I think it would be a really good idea to ensure that our 1.0.1
> > candidate tarball is testing on Solaris before release to the public.
> > I'm suggesting that we solicit volunteers who use Solaris to do this
> > testing for us -- maybe some of the folks who had problems with the
> > 0.37 and 1.0.0 tarballs? (Grep for "solaris" here:
> > http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svnusers/archive-2004-02/)
>
> I can do testing on Solaris 7,8,9
Michael, any word on how Subversion 1.0.1 pans out on these platforms?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: 1.0.1 preventative measures.
Posted by Michael Legart <mi...@legart.dk>.
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> I think it would be a really good idea to ensure that our 1.0.1
> candidate tarball is testing on Solaris before release to the public.
> I'm suggesting that we solicit volunteers who use Solaris to do this
> testing for us -- maybe some of the folks who had problems with the
> 0.37 and 1.0.0 tarballs? (Grep for "solaris" here:
> http://www.contactor.se/~dast/svnusers/archive-2004-02/)
I can do testing on Solaris 7,8,9
/Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org