You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@wicket.apache.org by "Alastair Maw (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/05/24 20:03:16 UTC
[jira] Updated: (WICKET-499) Investigate whether we can use
component meta data for the storage of feedback messages
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Alastair Maw updated WICKET-499:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: trunk)
If you're going to fix this for 1.3.0 final, please update your intended fix version. Given it's unassigned currently, I'm leaving this as something for the nebulous future.
> Investigate whether we can use component meta data for the storage of feedback messages
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: WICKET-499
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-499
> Project: Wicket
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: trunk
> Reporter: Eelco Hillenius
>
> Investigate this. See also http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-svn-commit%3A-r530991---in--incubator-wicket-trunk-jdk-1.4-wicket-src-main-java-org-apache-wicket%3A-Session.java-feedback-FeedbackMessages.java-p10119808.html
> Advantages of doing this:
> * it is a one-one mapping of the concept that you set a message on a component;
> * you'll never have to worry about cleanup up; just clean up rendered messages, and leave unrendered for whenever they are request or until the component is garbage collected.
> Disadvantages:
> * no central storage place, making it harder to track.
> * probably less efficient in both storage and processing.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.