Test-Builds for log4net 2.0.6

[Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>]

Hi all

I've created files from trunk that could be close to the next release
and uploaded them to http://stefan.samaflost.de/staging/log4net-2.0.6/

This is not a release, but I'd ask people to give them a try as I don't
expect us to change much before the real 2.0.6 release.

It looks as if I forgot to recreate the site so it is the same I
published something like two weeks ago.

Cheers

        Stefan

Re: Test-Builds for log4net 2.0.6

[Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>]

Hi Stefan,

thanks Stefan for getting this job done. I'm once more over-scheduled 
but I'll find a way to free a couple of hours next week. Then I am going 
to test the binaries against our products to see if it would break one 
of our applications.

Cheers

On 29/09/2016 20:33, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've created files from trunk that could be close to the next release
> and uploaded them to http://stefan.samaflost.de/staging/log4net-2.0.6/
>
> This is not a release, but I'd ask people to give them a try as I don't
> expect us to change much before the real 2.0.6 release.
>
> It looks as if I forgot to recreate the site so it is the same I
> published something like two weeks ago.
>
> Cheers
>
>          Stefan

Re: Test-Builds for log4net 2.0.6

[Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>]

On 2016-09-30, Dominik Psenner wrote:

> I've just checked the zip archives and found that within the archive
> there is a net-cp folder. Shouldn't that read as net-cf for compact
> framework?

cp == client profile.

We don't provide CF binaries at all with 2.0.6.

Stefan

Re: Test-Builds for log4net 2.0.6

[Dominik Psenner <dp...@gmail.com>]

I've just checked the zip archives and found that within the archive 
there is a net-cp folder. Shouldn't that read as net-cf for compact 
framework?

On 29/09/2016 20:33, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I've created files from trunk that could be close to the next release
> and uploaded them to http://stefan.samaflost.de/staging/log4net-2.0.6/
>
> This is not a release, but I'd ask people to give them a try as I don't
> expect us to change much before the real 2.0.6 release.
>
> It looks as if I forgot to recreate the site so it is the same I
> published something like two weeks ago.
>
> Cheers
>
>          Stefan