You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@sling.apache.org by Robert Munteanu <ro...@apache.org> on 2019/04/01 20:49:48 UTC
Re: Can Suffix be used in the Sling Filter Pattern?
On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 14:27 -0400, Cris Rockwell wrote:
> Ok. Thanks. It must be a version thing, because
> org.apache.sling.engine.EngineConstants.SLING_FILTER_SUFFIX_PATTERN
> is not found in my local maven repository or IDE.
Maybe it is not found due to the java compiler inlining constants?
> It’s odd because the bundle (org.apache.sling.engine) says is 2.6.16
> (using /system/console/bundles). When I expand the bundle details, I
> see lower versions.
>
> Bundle Location launchpad:resources/install/0/org.apache.sling.
> engine-2.6.6.jar
> Exported Packages org.apache.sling.engine,version=2.3.0
You are most likely using 2.6.16. The bundle location is (IIRC) set to
the first version of the bundle _or_ the first version of the bundle
present when a configuration is defined for a component belonging to
that bundle.
Robert
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 29, 2019, at 12:07 PM, Robert Munteanu <ro...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 10:47 -0400, Cris Rockwell wrote:
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > I want to follow up with a question I sent the group last year
> > > about
> > > using a suffix patterns when defining Sling Filters.
> > > http://apache-sling.73963.n3.nabble.com/Can-Suffix-be-used-in-the-Sling-Filter-Pattern-td4084561.html
> > > <
> > > http://apache-sling.73963.n3.nabble.com/Can-Suffix-be-used-in-the
> > > -
> > > Sling-Filter-Pattern-td4084561.html>
> > >
> > > The email response at the time was that Suffix patterns cannot be
> > > used to define a filter, and the advice was to check the suffix
> > > within the filter itself. If this is the case, then why does the
> > > documentation describe sling.filter.suffix.pattern as "Restrict
> > > the
> > > filter to requests with suffix that match the supplied regular
> > > expression. Requires Sling Engine 2.6.14.”
> > >
> > > https://sling.apache.org/documentation/the-sling-engine/filters.html
> > > <https://sling.apache.org/documentation/the-sling-
> > > engine/filters.html>
> > > Using org.apache.sling.engine 2.6.16, I have not had any luck
> > > configuring sling.filter.suffix.pattern. If this feature is not
> > > available or not working, I would recommend updating docs and
> > > removing it. Also, I would like to review the source code to see
> > > how
> > > the sling.filter.suffix.pattern was intended to be used, but I
> > > cannot
> > > find it. Please send a link if you can.
> >
> > Hi Cris,
> >
> > I think this is used at
> >
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-engine/blob/f2ddb41a68551e6d27a143bca00fb267d7af2230/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/engine/impl/filter/FilterPredicate.java#L67
> >
> > Robert
> >
Re: Can Suffix be used in the Sling Filter Pattern?
Posted by Justin Edelson <ju...@justinedelson.com>.
Anything is possible, but in general when Adobe provides an Adobe-generated
release of a Sling bundle in AEM, it is denoted with a timestamp and (since
the move to git) a git hash. For example, in AEM 6.4, I see
version 1.4.7-T20180205124646-b0647a3 for org.apache.sling.models.impl.
It would be very weird for you to see a release (even) version of a Sling
bundle in AEM which didn't come from Sling.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 6:21 PM Cris Rockwell <cm...@umich.edu> wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, but I doubt it. Many other EngineConstants work, but
> SLING_FILTER_SUFFIX_PATTERN is not there. This is in aem64 and suspect
> Adobe compiled their own sling engine bundle, because I see this bundle
> importing Adobe packages.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, 4:49 PM Robert Munteanu <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 14:27 -0400, Cris Rockwell wrote:
> > > Ok. Thanks. It must be a version thing, because
> > > org.apache.sling.engine.EngineConstants.SLING_FILTER_SUFFIX_PATTERN
> > > is not found in my local maven repository or IDE.
> >
> > Maybe it is not found due to the java compiler inlining constants?
> >
> > > It’s odd because the bundle (org.apache.sling.engine) says is 2.6.16
> > > (using /system/console/bundles). When I expand the bundle details, I
> > > see lower versions.
> > >
> > > Bundle Location launchpad:resources/install/0/org.apache.sling.
> > > engine-2.6.6.jar
> > > Exported Packages org.apache.sling.engine,version=2.3.0
> >
> > You are most likely using 2.6.16. The bundle location is (IIRC) set to
> > the first version of the bundle _or_ the first version of the bundle
> > present when a configuration is defined for a component belonging to
> > that bundle.
> >
> > Robert
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Mar 29, 2019, at 12:07 PM, Robert Munteanu <ro...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 10:47 -0400, Cris Rockwell wrote:
> > > > > Hi all
> > > > >
> > > > > I want to follow up with a question I sent the group last year
> > > > > about
> > > > > using a suffix patterns when defining Sling Filters.
> > > > >
> >
> http://apache-sling.73963.n3.nabble.com/Can-Suffix-be-used-in-the-Sling-Filter-Pattern-td4084561.html
> > > > > <
> > > > > http://apache-sling.73963.n3.nabble.com/Can-Suffix-be-used-in-the
> > > > > -
> > > > > Sling-Filter-Pattern-td4084561.html>
> > > > >
> > > > > The email response at the time was that Suffix patterns cannot be
> > > > > used to define a filter, and the advice was to check the suffix
> > > > > within the filter itself. If this is the case, then why does the
> > > > > documentation describe sling.filter.suffix.pattern as "Restrict
> > > > > the
> > > > > filter to requests with suffix that match the supplied regular
> > > > > expression. Requires Sling Engine 2.6.14.”
> > > > >
> > > > >
> https://sling.apache.org/documentation/the-sling-engine/filters.html
> > > > > <https://sling.apache.org/documentation/the-sling-
> > > > > engine/filters.html>
> > > > > Using org.apache.sling.engine 2.6.16, I have not had any luck
> > > > > configuring sling.filter.suffix.pattern. If this feature is not
> > > > > available or not working, I would recommend updating docs and
> > > > > removing it. Also, I would like to review the source code to see
> > > > > how
> > > > > the sling.filter.suffix.pattern was intended to be used, but I
> > > > > cannot
> > > > > find it. Please send a link if you can.
> > > >
> > > > Hi Cris,
> > > >
> > > > I think this is used at
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-engine/blob/f2ddb41a68551e6d27a143bca00fb267d7af2230/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/engine/impl/filter/FilterPredicate.java#L67
> > > >
> > > > Robert
> > > >
> >
> >
>
Re: Can Suffix be used in the Sling Filter Pattern?
Posted by Cris Rockwell <cm...@umich.edu>.
Thanks for the reply, but I doubt it. Many other EngineConstants work, but
SLING_FILTER_SUFFIX_PATTERN is not there. This is in aem64 and suspect
Adobe compiled their own sling engine bundle, because I see this bundle
importing Adobe packages.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, 4:49 PM Robert Munteanu <ro...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 14:27 -0400, Cris Rockwell wrote:
> > Ok. Thanks. It must be a version thing, because
> > org.apache.sling.engine.EngineConstants.SLING_FILTER_SUFFIX_PATTERN
> > is not found in my local maven repository or IDE.
>
> Maybe it is not found due to the java compiler inlining constants?
>
> > It’s odd because the bundle (org.apache.sling.engine) says is 2.6.16
> > (using /system/console/bundles). When I expand the bundle details, I
> > see lower versions.
> >
> > Bundle Location launchpad:resources/install/0/org.apache.sling.
> > engine-2.6.6.jar
> > Exported Packages org.apache.sling.engine,version=2.3.0
>
> You are most likely using 2.6.16. The bundle location is (IIRC) set to
> the first version of the bundle _or_ the first version of the bundle
> present when a configuration is defined for a component belonging to
> that bundle.
>
> Robert
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Mar 29, 2019, at 12:07 PM, Robert Munteanu <ro...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2019-03-29 at 10:47 -0400, Cris Rockwell wrote:
> > > > Hi all
> > > >
> > > > I want to follow up with a question I sent the group last year
> > > > about
> > > > using a suffix patterns when defining Sling Filters.
> > > >
> http://apache-sling.73963.n3.nabble.com/Can-Suffix-be-used-in-the-Sling-Filter-Pattern-td4084561.html
> > > > <
> > > > http://apache-sling.73963.n3.nabble.com/Can-Suffix-be-used-in-the
> > > > -
> > > > Sling-Filter-Pattern-td4084561.html>
> > > >
> > > > The email response at the time was that Suffix patterns cannot be
> > > > used to define a filter, and the advice was to check the suffix
> > > > within the filter itself. If this is the case, then why does the
> > > > documentation describe sling.filter.suffix.pattern as "Restrict
> > > > the
> > > > filter to requests with suffix that match the supplied regular
> > > > expression. Requires Sling Engine 2.6.14.”
> > > >
> > > > https://sling.apache.org/documentation/the-sling-engine/filters.html
> > > > <https://sling.apache.org/documentation/the-sling-
> > > > engine/filters.html>
> > > > Using org.apache.sling.engine 2.6.16, I have not had any luck
> > > > configuring sling.filter.suffix.pattern. If this feature is not
> > > > available or not working, I would recommend updating docs and
> > > > removing it. Also, I would like to review the source code to see
> > > > how
> > > > the sling.filter.suffix.pattern was intended to be used, but I
> > > > cannot
> > > > find it. Please send a link if you can.
> > >
> > > Hi Cris,
> > >
> > > I think this is used at
> > >
> > >
> > >
> https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-engine/blob/f2ddb41a68551e6d27a143bca00fb267d7af2230/src/main/java/org/apache/sling/engine/impl/filter/FilterPredicate.java#L67
> > >
> > > Robert
> > >
>
>