You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/06/30 22:13:41 UTC

[GitHub] [spark] sunchao opened a new pull request, #37037: [SPARK-37205][FOLLOWUP] Should call non-static setTokensConf method

sunchao opened a new pull request, #37037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37037

   <!--
   Thanks for sending a pull request!  Here are some tips for you:
     1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: https://spark.apache.org/contributing.html
     2. Ensure you have added or run the appropriate tests for your PR: https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html
     3. If the PR is unfinished, add '[WIP]' in your PR title, e.g., '[WIP][SPARK-XXXX] Your PR title ...'.
     4. Be sure to keep the PR description updated to reflect all changes.
     5. Please write your PR title to summarize what this PR proposes.
     6. If possible, provide a concise example to reproduce the issue for a faster review.
     7. If you want to add a new configuration, please read the guideline first for naming configurations in
        'core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/ConfigEntry.scala'.
     8. If you want to add or modify an error type or message, please read the guideline first in
        'core/src/main/resources/error/README.md'.
   -->
   
   ### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
   <!--
   Please clarify what changes you are proposing. The purpose of this section is to outline the changes and how this PR fixes the issue. 
   If possible, please consider writing useful notes for better and faster reviews in your PR. See the examples below.
     1. If you refactor some codes with changing classes, showing the class hierarchy will help reviewers.
     2. If you fix some SQL features, you can provide some references of other DBMSes.
     3. If there is design documentation, please add the link.
     4. If there is a discussion in the mailing list, please add the link.
   -->
   
   This fixes a bug in the original SPARK-37205 PR, where we treat the method `setTokensConf` as a static method, but it should be non-static instead.
   
   ### Why are the changes needed?
   <!--
   Please clarify why the changes are needed. For instance,
     1. If you propose a new API, clarify the use case for a new API.
     2. If you fix a bug, you can clarify why it is a bug.
   -->
   
   The method `setTokensConf` is non-static so the current code will fail:
   ```
   06/29/2022 - 17:28:16  - Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: object is not an instance of declaring class
   06/29/2022 - 17:28:16  - at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
   06/29/2022 - 17:28:16  - at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62)
   06/29/2022 - 17:28:16  - at java.base/jdk.internal.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
   06/29/2022 - 17:28:16  - at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:566)
   ```
   
   ### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
   <!--
   Note that it means *any* user-facing change including all aspects such as the documentation fix.
   If yes, please clarify the previous behavior and the change this PR proposes - provide the console output, description and/or an example to show the behavior difference if possible.
   If possible, please also clarify if this is a user-facing change compared to the released Spark versions or within the unreleased branches such as master.
   If no, write 'No'.
   -->
   
   No
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   <!--
   If tests were added, say they were added here. Please make sure to add some test cases that check the changes thoroughly including negative and positive cases if possible.
   If it was tested in a way different from regular unit tests, please clarify how you tested step by step, ideally copy and paste-able, so that other reviewers can test and check, and descendants can verify in the future.
   If tests were not added, please describe why they were not added and/or why it was difficult to add.
   If benchmark tests were added, please run the benchmarks in GitHub Actions for the consistent environment, and the instructions could accord to: https://spark.apache.org/developer-tools.html#github-workflow-benchmarks.
   -->
   
   Manually tested this change internally and it now works.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] sunchao closed pull request #37037: [SPARK-37205][FOLLOWUP] Should call non-static setTokensConf method

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
sunchao closed pull request #37037: [SPARK-37205][FOLLOWUP] Should call non-static setTokensConf method
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37037


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] sunchao commented on pull request #37037: [SPARK-37205][FOLLOWUP] Should call non-static setTokensConf method

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
sunchao commented on PR #37037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37037#issuecomment-1171729164

   cc @dongjoon-hyun @viirya for review


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] sunchao commented on pull request #37037: [SPARK-37205][FOLLOWUP] Should call non-static setTokensConf method

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
sunchao commented on PR #37037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37037#issuecomment-1171980055

   Merged to master/3.3, thanks!


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] sunchao commented on pull request #37037: [SPARK-37205][FOLLOWUP] Should call non-static setTokensConf method

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
sunchao commented on PR #37037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37037#issuecomment-1172521396

   @dongjoon-hyun you are right, I forgot the fixed version for this is different now. Should I revert the commit, create a new JIRA and link this PR to it?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun commented on pull request #37037: [SPARK-37205][FOLLOWUP] Should call non-static setTokensConf method

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #37037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37037#issuecomment-1172515995

   Sorry for being late, @sunchao . BTW, please consider like a release manager.
   - Unfortunately, this PR is completely lost in term of JIRA information and mislead the users.
   - 3.3.0 is already shipped and this PR is only fix the issue at 3.3.1, isn't it? 
   - In short, we should not use `FOLLOWUP` PR after release because of the fixed version information should be different.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] sunchao commented on pull request #37037: [SPARK-37205][FOLLOWUP] Should call non-static setTokensConf method

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
sunchao commented on PR #37037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37037#issuecomment-1171733016

   Yes, I'll commit it to both 3.3 and master.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] dongjoon-hyun commented on pull request #37037: [SPARK-37205][FOLLOWUP] Should call non-static setTokensConf method

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
dongjoon-hyun commented on PR #37037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37037#issuecomment-1172522421

   You can follow the best practice next time. That will be enough. There exist multiple instances like this.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org


[GitHub] [spark] viirya commented on pull request #37037: [SPARK-37205][FOLLOWUP] Should call non-static setTokensConf method

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
viirya commented on PR #37037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/37037#issuecomment-1171732349

   This needs to be in 3.3, right?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org