You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/11/01 14:28:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-10455) Potential Kafka producer leak in case of failures

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10455?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated FLINK-10455:
-----------------------------------
    Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Potential Kafka producer leak in case of failures
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-10455
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-10455
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Kafka Connector
>    Affects Versions: 1.5.2
>            Reporter: Nico Kruber
>            Assignee: Andrey Zagrebin
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> If the Kafka brokers' timeout is too low for our checkpoint interval [1], we may get an {{ProducerFencedException}}. Documentation around {{ProducerFencedException}} explicitly states that we should close the producer after encountering it.
> By looking at the code, it doesn't seem like this is actually done in {{FlinkKafkaProducer011}}. Also, in case one transaction's commit in {{TwoPhaseCommitSinkFunction#notifyCheckpointComplete}} fails with an exception, we don't clean up (nor try to commit) any other transaction.
> -> from what I see, {{TwoPhaseCommitSinkFunction#notifyCheckpointComplete}} simply iterates over the {{pendingCommitTransactions}} which is not touched during {{close()}}
> Now if we restart the failing job on the same Flink cluster, any resources from the previous attempt will still linger around.
> [1] https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-1.5/dev/connectors/kafka.html#kafka-011



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)