You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@opennlp.apache.org by Martin Wiesner <ma...@apache.org> on 2023/06/04 10:30:59 UTC
Re: Feedback & opinions on: "OPENNLP-1496 Migrate OpenNLP towards JDK 17"
Hi everybody,
Does anyone else have feedback or wants to share his/her opinion regarding the move to Java 17?
Best
Martin
—
https://twitter.com/mawiesne
https://github.com/mawiesne
On 2023/05/30 18:05:28 Richard Zowalla wrote:
> +1
>
> Am Dienstag, dem 30.05.2023 um 16:49 +0200 schrieb Martin Wiesner:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > time progresses and Java 11 LTS is set to be EOL with 30 Sep 2023
> > (see: https://endoflife.date/java). Therefore, some days ago, I’ve
> > opened OPENNLP-1496, proposing to migrate OpenNLP’s codebase to Java
> > 17 LTS, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1496.
> >
> > The (official) EOL date will hit pretty soon. With that in mind, the
> > project should consider to migrate the build and target JDK towards
> > the next LTS release, that is: Java 17. This will be supported until
> > at least 30 Sep 2026.
> >
> > The primary aims that I identified are:
> > - Keep pace with the Java ecosystem,
> > - Modernizes the code base with new(er) language features,
> > - Benefit by performance enhancements and fixes provided with 17.x
> > LTS.
> >
> > A PR that demonstrates that all build steps (GH actions) are green,
> > and no blockers occur, is already available here:
> > https://github.com/apache/opennlp/pull/535
> > and received some feedback.
> >
> > With that being said, I’d like reach out here on the list(s) and to
> > get your opinions on moving on to J17. Open for (m)any comments.
> >
> > Thanks
> > mawiesne
> > —
> > https://twitter.com/mawiesne
> > https://github.com/mawiesne
> >
> >
>
>
Re: Feedback & opinions on: "OPENNLP-1496 Migrate OpenNLP towards JDK 17"
Posted by Martin Wiesner <ma...@apache.org>.
Hello everybody,
I note that there were no additional comments or objections to OpenNLP-1496.
For obvious reasons, I’m also +1 with it.
This gives the move to Java 17 and the associated PR 535 (https://github.com/apache/opennlp/pull/535) a five +1 votes (Richard, Atita, Jeff, Bruno, Martin).
Therefore, I will now proceed and merge this PR to the main branch.
Best regards
Martin
On 2023/06/05 15:47:13 Richard Zowalla wrote:
> +1
>
> Am Montag, dem 05.06.2023 um 15:43 +0000 schrieb Martin Wiesner:
> > Thanks Richard, Atita & Jeff for the feedback.
> >
> > I think we should encourage others to share their opinion(s).
> > I'd like to propose we continue to collect further comments until at
> > least Friday, 9 June 2023. If no other opinions/comments arise, I'd
> > assume "lazy consensus" on PR 535 by the (dev) community.
> >
> > On the following Saturday, June 10, 2023, we can then reach a
> > conclusion and take a decision.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Martin
> >
> > On 2023/06/04 15:28:28 Jeff Zemerick wrote:
> > > I'm also a +1.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 7:08 AM Atita Arora <at...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1 from my side !
> > > > Let's move with time, :) I wonder if we have use cases where we
> > > > need to
> > > > support backward compatibility.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 12:31 PM Martin Wiesner
> > > > <ma...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi everybody,
> > > > >
> > > > > Does anyone else have feedback or wants to share his/her
> > > > > opinion
> > > > regarding
> > > > > the move to Java 17?
> > > > >
> > > > > Best
> > > > > Martin
> > > > > —
> > > > > https://twitter.com/mawiesne
> > > > > https://github.com/mawiesne
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2023/05/30 18:05:28 Richard Zowalla wrote:
> > > > > > +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Am Dienstag, dem 30.05.2023 um 16:49 +0200 schrieb Martin
> > > > > > Wiesner:
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > time progresses and Java 11 LTS is set to be EOL with 30
> > > > > > > Sep 2023
> > > > > > > (see: https://endoflife.date/java). Therefore, some days
> > > > > > > ago, I’ve
> > > > > > > opened OPENNLP-1496, proposing to migrate OpenNLP’s
> > > > > > > codebase to Java
> > > > > > > 17 LTS, see:
> > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1496.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The (official) EOL date will hit pretty soon. With that in
> > > > > > > mind, the
> > > > > > > project should consider to migrate the build and target JDK
> > > > > > > towards
> > > > > > > the next LTS release, that is: Java 17. This will be
> > > > > > > supported until
> > > > > > > at least 30 Sep 2026.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The primary aims that I identified are:
> > > > > > > - Keep pace with the Java ecosystem,
> > > > > > > - Modernizes the code base with new(er) language features,
> > > > > > > - Benefit by performance enhancements and fixes provided
> > > > > > > with 17.x
> > > > > > > LTS.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > A PR that demonstrates that all build steps (GH actions)
> > > > > > > are green,
> > > > > > > and no blockers occur, is already available here:
> > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/opennlp/pull/535
> > > > > > > and received some feedback.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > With that being said, I’d like reach out here on the
> > > > > > > list(s) and to
> > > > > > > get your opinions on moving on to J17. Open for (m)any
> > > > > > > comments.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > mawiesne
> > > > > > > —
> > > > > > > https://twitter.com/mawiesne
> > > > > > > https://github.com/mawiesne
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
>
Re: Feedback & opinions on: "OPENNLP-1496 Migrate OpenNLP towards JDK 17"
Posted by Richard Zowalla <rz...@apache.org>.
+1
Am Montag, dem 05.06.2023 um 15:43 +0000 schrieb Martin Wiesner:
> Thanks Richard, Atita & Jeff for the feedback.
>
> I think we should encourage others to share their opinion(s).
> I'd like to propose we continue to collect further comments until at
> least Friday, 9 June 2023. If no other opinions/comments arise, I'd
> assume "lazy consensus" on PR 535 by the (dev) community.
>
> On the following Saturday, June 10, 2023, we can then reach a
> conclusion and take a decision.
>
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
> On 2023/06/04 15:28:28 Jeff Zemerick wrote:
> > I'm also a +1.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jeff
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 7:08 AM Atita Arora <at...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 from my side !
> > > Let's move with time, :) I wonder if we have use cases where we
> > > need to
> > > support backward compatibility.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 12:31 PM Martin Wiesner
> > > <ma...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi everybody,
> > > >
> > > > Does anyone else have feedback or wants to share his/her
> > > > opinion
> > > regarding
> > > > the move to Java 17?
> > > >
> > > > Best
> > > > Martin
> > > > —
> > > > https://twitter.com/mawiesne
> > > > https://github.com/mawiesne
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2023/05/30 18:05:28 Richard Zowalla wrote:
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Am Dienstag, dem 30.05.2023 um 16:49 +0200 schrieb Martin
> > > > > Wiesner:
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > time progresses and Java 11 LTS is set to be EOL with 30
> > > > > > Sep 2023
> > > > > > (see: https://endoflife.date/java). Therefore, some days
> > > > > > ago, I’ve
> > > > > > opened OPENNLP-1496, proposing to migrate OpenNLP’s
> > > > > > codebase to Java
> > > > > > 17 LTS, see:
> > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1496.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The (official) EOL date will hit pretty soon. With that in
> > > > > > mind, the
> > > > > > project should consider to migrate the build and target JDK
> > > > > > towards
> > > > > > the next LTS release, that is: Java 17. This will be
> > > > > > supported until
> > > > > > at least 30 Sep 2026.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The primary aims that I identified are:
> > > > > > - Keep pace with the Java ecosystem,
> > > > > > - Modernizes the code base with new(er) language features,
> > > > > > - Benefit by performance enhancements and fixes provided
> > > > > > with 17.x
> > > > > > LTS.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > A PR that demonstrates that all build steps (GH actions)
> > > > > > are green,
> > > > > > and no blockers occur, is already available here:
> > > > > > https://github.com/apache/opennlp/pull/535
> > > > > > and received some feedback.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > With that being said, I’d like reach out here on the
> > > > > > list(s) and to
> > > > > > get your opinions on moving on to J17. Open for (m)any
> > > > > > comments.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > mawiesne
> > > > > > —
> > > > > > https://twitter.com/mawiesne
> > > > > > https://github.com/mawiesne
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
Re: Feedback & opinions on: "OPENNLP-1496 Migrate OpenNLP towards JDK 17"
Posted by Martin Wiesner <ma...@apache.org>.
Thanks Richard, Atita & Jeff for the feedback.
I think we should encourage others to share their opinion(s).
I'd like to propose we continue to collect further comments until at least Friday, 9 June 2023. If no other opinions/comments arise, I'd assume "lazy consensus" on PR 535 by the (dev) community.
On the following Saturday, June 10, 2023, we can then reach a conclusion and take a decision.
Thanks,
Martin
On 2023/06/04 15:28:28 Jeff Zemerick wrote:
> I'm also a +1.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 7:08 AM Atita Arora <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 from my side !
> > Let's move with time, :) I wonder if we have use cases where we need to
> > support backward compatibility.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 12:31 PM Martin Wiesner <ma...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > Does anyone else have feedback or wants to share his/her opinion
> > regarding
> > > the move to Java 17?
> > >
> > > Best
> > > Martin
> > > —
> > > https://twitter.com/mawiesne
> > > https://github.com/mawiesne
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2023/05/30 18:05:28 Richard Zowalla wrote:
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Am Dienstag, dem 30.05.2023 um 16:49 +0200 schrieb Martin Wiesner:
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > time progresses and Java 11 LTS is set to be EOL with 30 Sep 2023
> > > > > (see: https://endoflife.date/java). Therefore, some days ago, I’ve
> > > > > opened OPENNLP-1496, proposing to migrate OpenNLP’s codebase to Java
> > > > > 17 LTS, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1496.
> > > > >
> > > > > The (official) EOL date will hit pretty soon. With that in mind, the
> > > > > project should consider to migrate the build and target JDK towards
> > > > > the next LTS release, that is: Java 17. This will be supported until
> > > > > at least 30 Sep 2026.
> > > > >
> > > > > The primary aims that I identified are:
> > > > > - Keep pace with the Java ecosystem,
> > > > > - Modernizes the code base with new(er) language features,
> > > > > - Benefit by performance enhancements and fixes provided with 17.x
> > > > > LTS.
> > > > >
> > > > > A PR that demonstrates that all build steps (GH actions) are green,
> > > > > and no blockers occur, is already available here:
> > > > > https://github.com/apache/opennlp/pull/535
> > > > > and received some feedback.
> > > > >
> > > > > With that being said, I’d like reach out here on the list(s) and to
> > > > > get your opinions on moving on to J17. Open for (m)any comments.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > mawiesne
> > > > > —
> > > > > https://twitter.com/mawiesne
> > > > > https://github.com/mawiesne
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Feedback & opinions on: "OPENNLP-1496 Migrate OpenNLP towards JDK 17"
Posted by Jeff Zemerick <jz...@apache.org>.
I'm also a +1.
Thanks,
Jeff
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 7:08 AM Atita Arora <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from my side !
> Let's move with time, :) I wonder if we have use cases where we need to
> support backward compatibility.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 12:31 PM Martin Wiesner <ma...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > Does anyone else have feedback or wants to share his/her opinion
> regarding
> > the move to Java 17?
> >
> > Best
> > Martin
> > —
> > https://twitter.com/mawiesne
> > https://github.com/mawiesne
> >
> >
> > On 2023/05/30 18:05:28 Richard Zowalla wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Am Dienstag, dem 30.05.2023 um 16:49 +0200 schrieb Martin Wiesner:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > time progresses and Java 11 LTS is set to be EOL with 30 Sep 2023
> > > > (see: https://endoflife.date/java). Therefore, some days ago, I’ve
> > > > opened OPENNLP-1496, proposing to migrate OpenNLP’s codebase to Java
> > > > 17 LTS, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1496.
> > > >
> > > > The (official) EOL date will hit pretty soon. With that in mind, the
> > > > project should consider to migrate the build and target JDK towards
> > > > the next LTS release, that is: Java 17. This will be supported until
> > > > at least 30 Sep 2026.
> > > >
> > > > The primary aims that I identified are:
> > > > - Keep pace with the Java ecosystem,
> > > > - Modernizes the code base with new(er) language features,
> > > > - Benefit by performance enhancements and fixes provided with 17.x
> > > > LTS.
> > > >
> > > > A PR that demonstrates that all build steps (GH actions) are green,
> > > > and no blockers occur, is already available here:
> > > > https://github.com/apache/opennlp/pull/535
> > > > and received some feedback.
> > > >
> > > > With that being said, I’d like reach out here on the list(s) and to
> > > > get your opinions on moving on to J17. Open for (m)any comments.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > mawiesne
> > > > —
> > > > https://twitter.com/mawiesne
> > > > https://github.com/mawiesne
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Feedback & opinions on: "OPENNLP-1496 Migrate OpenNLP towards JDK 17"
Posted by Atita Arora <at...@gmail.com>.
+1 from my side !
Let's move with time, :) I wonder if we have use cases where we need to
support backward compatibility.
On Sun, Jun 4, 2023 at 12:31 PM Martin Wiesner <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> Does anyone else have feedback or wants to share his/her opinion regarding
> the move to Java 17?
>
> Best
> Martin
> —
> https://twitter.com/mawiesne
> https://github.com/mawiesne
>
>
> On 2023/05/30 18:05:28 Richard Zowalla wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Am Dienstag, dem 30.05.2023 um 16:49 +0200 schrieb Martin Wiesner:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > time progresses and Java 11 LTS is set to be EOL with 30 Sep 2023
> > > (see: https://endoflife.date/java). Therefore, some days ago, I’ve
> > > opened OPENNLP-1496, proposing to migrate OpenNLP’s codebase to Java
> > > 17 LTS, see: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENNLP-1496.
> > >
> > > The (official) EOL date will hit pretty soon. With that in mind, the
> > > project should consider to migrate the build and target JDK towards
> > > the next LTS release, that is: Java 17. This will be supported until
> > > at least 30 Sep 2026.
> > >
> > > The primary aims that I identified are:
> > > - Keep pace with the Java ecosystem,
> > > - Modernizes the code base with new(er) language features,
> > > - Benefit by performance enhancements and fixes provided with 17.x
> > > LTS.
> > >
> > > A PR that demonstrates that all build steps (GH actions) are green,
> > > and no blockers occur, is already available here:
> > > https://github.com/apache/opennlp/pull/535
> > > and received some feedback.
> > >
> > > With that being said, I’d like reach out here on the list(s) and to
> > > get your opinions on moving on to J17. Open for (m)any comments.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > mawiesne
> > > —
> > > https://twitter.com/mawiesne
> > > https://github.com/mawiesne
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>