You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@superset.apache.org by ro...@dealmeida.net on 2026/05/06 20:10:56 UTC

Re: [VOTE] Proposal for Soft Deletion of Charts, Dashboards and DataSets

+1, binding!

This is great. Space for metadata is so cheap, there's no reason to 
actually delete tings.

--Beto

On 2026-04-30 08:28, Michael Bridge wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> I am calling for a vote on [SIP-208].  This proposal suggests changing 
> how
> deletion works for charts, dashboards and datasets.   Deleted records 
> will
> be flagged with a "deleted_at" field instead of being removed from the
> database, and these soft-deleted records will be automatically omitted 
> from
> existing queries.
> 
> See the proposal and discussion here:
> https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/39464
> 
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> number of votes is reached.
> 
> Please vote accordingly:
> 
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason

Re: [VOTE] Proposal for Soft Deletion of Charts, Dashboards and DataSets

Posted by Elizabeth Thompson <el...@preset.io>.
+1 binding! Thanks Mike!

Elizabeth Thompson
Director of Engineering
elizabeth@preset.io



> On May 6, 2026, at 1:10 PM, roberto@dealmeida.net wrote:
> 
> +1, binding!
> 
> This is great. Space for metadata is so cheap, there's no reason to actually delete tings.
> 
> --Beto
> 
> On 2026-04-30 08:28, Michael Bridge wrote:
>> Hello!
>> I am calling for a vote on [SIP-208].  This proposal suggests changing how
>> deletion works for charts, dashboards and datasets.   Deleted records will
>> be flagged with a "deleted_at" field instead of being removed from the
>> database, and these soft-deleted records will be automatically omitted from
>> existing queries.
>> See the proposal and discussion here:
>> https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/39464
>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
>> number of votes is reached.
>> Please vote accordingly:
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason


Re: [VOTE] Proposal for Soft Deletion of Charts, Dashboards and DataSets

Posted by Sam Firke <sa...@firke.com>.
+1 binding

On Wed, May 6, 2026, at 6:36 PM, Antonio Rivero wrote:
> +1 (binding),
> 
> Antonio.
> 
> On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 22:11 <ro...@dealmeida.net> wrote:
> 
> > +1, binding!
> >
> > This is great. Space for metadata is so cheap, there's no reason to
> > actually delete tings.
> >
> > --Beto
> >
> > On 2026-04-30 08:28, Michael Bridge wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > I am calling for a vote on [SIP-208].  This proposal suggests changing
> > > how
> > > deletion works for charts, dashboards and datasets.   Deleted records
> > > will
> > > be flagged with a "deleted_at" field instead of being removed from the
> > > database, and these soft-deleted records will be automatically omitted
> > > from
> > > existing queries.
> > >
> > > See the proposal and discussion here:
> > > https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/39464
> > >
> > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> > > number of votes is reached.
> > >
> > > Please vote accordingly:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> >
> 

Re: [VOTE] Proposal for Soft Deletion of Charts, Dashboards and DataSets

Posted by Antonio Rivero <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding),

Antonio.

On Wed, May 6, 2026 at 22:11 <ro...@dealmeida.net> wrote:

> +1, binding!
>
> This is great. Space for metadata is so cheap, there's no reason to
> actually delete tings.
>
> --Beto
>
> On 2026-04-30 08:28, Michael Bridge wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I am calling for a vote on [SIP-208].  This proposal suggests changing
> > how
> > deletion works for charts, dashboards and datasets.   Deleted records
> > will
> > be flagged with a "deleted_at" field instead of being removed from the
> > database, and these soft-deleted records will be automatically omitted
> > from
> > existing queries.
> >
> > See the proposal and discussion here:
> > https://github.com/apache/superset/issues/39464
> >
> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours or until the necessary
> > number of votes is reached.
> >
> > Please vote accordingly:
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>