You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> on 2014/12/05 11:11:37 UTC
[VOTE] [JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 2)
Hi
Another try with license/notice files
- here is the maven repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065
- assemblies can be found here
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065/org/apache/commons/commons-jcs-dist/2.0-beta-1/
- tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
- KEYS: https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
- Site staging is: http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
- rat report is (not I delete LICENSE.xerox and zipcodes.txt from this
report directly cause I didn't find a way to configure apache-rat
correctly with maven site):
http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/rat-report.html
About last vote we spoke about should assembly contain a readme, the
site or something like that, I checked few projects and it doesn't
seem mandatory so I didn't update them.
Please review the release candidate and vote.
This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now or until we get
3 PMC votes.
[ ] +1 Release these artifacts
[ ] +-0 OK, but...
[ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
Here is my +1
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 2)
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
yes there are 2-3 tests which can fail "easily" (on my machine I
shouldn't do anything else otherwise it fails). Reruing them is enough
to have a green build in general.
About notice file I didnt do anything special.
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-09 21:51 GMT+01:00 Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>:
> Hi,
>
> the jars and javadoc-jars now indeed contain LICENSE and NOTICE files
> (the source artifacts still do not); however, I have the impression that
> these are not the correct ones: they are missing the .txt extension, and
> at least the content of NOTICE is different from the NOTICE.txt shipped
> at the top-level directory of the distribution.
>
> When building I was this time more patient. After 33 minutes the build
> failed with a test failure:
>
> Results :
>
> Failed tests:
> IndexDiskCacheUnitTest.testUpdate_EventLogging_simple:605 End should
> have been
> called. expected:<1> but was:<0>
>
> Tests run: 369, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
>
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> [INFO]
> [INFO] Apache Commons JCS ................................ SUCCESS [5.235s]
> [INFO] Apache Commons JCS :: Core ........................ FAILURE
> [33:28.707s]
> [INFO] Apache Commons JCS :: JCache ...................... SKIPPED
> [INFO] Apache Commons JCS :: JCache TCK .................. SKIPPED
> [INFO] Apache Commons JCS :: JCache Extras ............... SKIPPED
> [INFO] Apache Commons JCS :: JCache OpenJPA .............. SKIPPED
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 33:34.925s
>
> This is my environment:
> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da;
> 2013-02-19 14:51:
> 28+0100)
> Maven home: C:\data\dev\tools\apache-maven-3.0.5\bin\..
> Java version: 1.7.0_67, vendor: Oracle Corporation
> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_67\jre
> Default locale: de_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
> OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
>
> Oliver
>
> Am 05.12.2014 um 11:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
>> Hi
>>
>> Another try with license/notice files
>>
>> - here is the maven repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065
>> - assemblies can be found here
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065/org/apache/commons/commons-jcs-dist/2.0-beta-1/
>> - tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
>> - KEYS: https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>> - Site staging is: http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
>> - rat report is (not I delete LICENSE.xerox and zipcodes.txt from this
>> report directly cause I didn't find a way to configure apache-rat
>> correctly with maven site):
>> http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/rat-report.html
>>
>> About last vote we spoke about should assembly contain a readme, the
>> site or something like that, I checked few projects and it doesn't
>> seem mandatory so I didn't update them.
>>
>> Please review the release candidate and vote.
>> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now or until we get
>> 3 PMC votes.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>> [ ] +-0 OK, but...
>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 2)
Posted by Oliver Heger <ol...@oliver-heger.de>.
Hi,
the jars and javadoc-jars now indeed contain LICENSE and NOTICE files
(the source artifacts still do not); however, I have the impression that
these are not the correct ones: they are missing the .txt extension, and
at least the content of NOTICE is different from the NOTICE.txt shipped
at the top-level directory of the distribution.
When building I was this time more patient. After 33 minutes the build
failed with a test failure:
Results :
Failed tests:
IndexDiskCacheUnitTest.testUpdate_EventLogging_simple:605 End should
have been
called. expected:<1> but was:<0>
Tests run: 369, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Reactor Summary:
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Commons JCS ................................ SUCCESS [5.235s]
[INFO] Apache Commons JCS :: Core ........................ FAILURE
[33:28.707s]
[INFO] Apache Commons JCS :: JCache ...................... SKIPPED
[INFO] Apache Commons JCS :: JCache TCK .................. SKIPPED
[INFO] Apache Commons JCS :: JCache Extras ............... SKIPPED
[INFO] Apache Commons JCS :: JCache OpenJPA .............. SKIPPED
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 33:34.925s
This is my environment:
Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da;
2013-02-19 14:51:
28+0100)
Maven home: C:\data\dev\tools\apache-maven-3.0.5\bin\..
Java version: 1.7.0_67, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_67\jre
Default locale: de_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family: "windows"
Oliver
Am 05.12.2014 um 11:11 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau:
> Hi
>
> Another try with license/notice files
>
> - here is the maven repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065
> - assemblies can be found here
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065/org/apache/commons/commons-jcs-dist/2.0-beta-1/
> - tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
> - KEYS: https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> - Site staging is: http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
> - rat report is (not I delete LICENSE.xerox and zipcodes.txt from this
> report directly cause I didn't find a way to configure apache-rat
> correctly with maven site):
> http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/rat-report.html
>
> About last vote we spoke about should assembly contain a readme, the
> site or something like that, I checked few projects and it doesn't
> seem mandatory so I didn't update them.
>
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now or until we get
> 3 PMC votes.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +-0 OK, but...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
>
> Here is my +1
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 2)
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
ok,
yeah sources jars are the ones without these files
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-12-10 11:30 GMT+01:00 sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
> On 10 December 2014 at 09:36, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2014-12-10 10:07 GMT+01:00 sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
>>> There are some discrepancies between the source artifact and the SVN tag.
>>>
>>> The source artifact contains derby.log under commons-jcs-jcache-openjpa
>>>
>>> The source bundles should not contain the doap file
>>>
>>> Those problems can be addressed by fixing the appropriate assembly descriptors.
>>> Note that the presence of derby.log shows how easy it is for bundles
>>> to contain spurious files, and why it is necessary to compare the
>>> source bundle with the SVN tag as part of checking the RC.
>>> Luckily in this case the file is harmless, but it could have been
>>> anything lying around in the workspace.
>>>
>>> The following directory trees are in SVN but not the source bundle:
>>>
>>> auxiliary-builds
>>> commons-jcs-sandbox
>>> src/experimental
>>>
>>> This is not a blocker, but they are a nuisance when comparing source and SVN.
>>> Maybe consider creating a branch and then drop them from trunk?
>>>
>>>
>>> The NOTICE.txt file must not contain references to LICENSE.txt
>>> The LICENSE.xerox file does not appear to require attribution, so the
>>> NOTICE.txt file must not reference Xerox.
>>> The LICENSE.txt file ought to contain the full text of all required
>>> licenses; failing that it needs to reference any external files by
>>> name.
>>>
>>> The source jars must have NOTICE and LICENSE files in the META-INF directories
>>>
>>
>> Which jar doesnt have it? binaries have them, didnt check
>> source/javadoc ones but other should have
>
> As I wrote: it was one of the _source_ jars that did not have the files.
>
> As it happens, I checked commons-jcs-jcache-2.0-beta-1-sources
>
> The same applies to commons-jcs-jcache-extras-2.0-beta-1-sources
> and presumably the others.
>
>>> -1 for the N&L issues.
>>>
>>> On 5 December 2014 at 10:11, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Another try with license/notice files
>>>>
>>>> - here is the maven repo:
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065
>>>> - assemblies can be found here
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065/org/apache/commons/commons-jcs-dist/2.0-beta-1/
>>>> - tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
>>>> - KEYS: https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>>>> - Site staging is: http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
>>>> - rat report is (not I delete LICENSE.xerox and zipcodes.txt from this
>>>> report directly cause I didn't find a way to configure apache-rat
>>>> correctly with maven site):
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/rat-report.html
>>>>
>>>> About last vote we spoke about should assembly contain a readme, the
>>>> site or something like that, I checked few projects and it doesn't
>>>> seem mandatory so I didn't update them.
>>>>
>>>> Please review the release candidate and vote.
>>>> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now or until we get
>>>> 3 PMC votes.
>>>>
>>>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>>> [ ] +-0 OK, but...
>>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Here is my +1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau
>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 10 December 2014 at 09:36, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2014-12-10 10:07 GMT+01:00 sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
>> There are some discrepancies between the source artifact and the SVN tag.
>>
>> The source artifact contains derby.log under commons-jcs-jcache-openjpa
>>
>> The source bundles should not contain the doap file
>>
>> Those problems can be addressed by fixing the appropriate assembly descriptors.
>> Note that the presence of derby.log shows how easy it is for bundles
>> to contain spurious files, and why it is necessary to compare the
>> source bundle with the SVN tag as part of checking the RC.
>> Luckily in this case the file is harmless, but it could have been
>> anything lying around in the workspace.
>>
>> The following directory trees are in SVN but not the source bundle:
>>
>> auxiliary-builds
>> commons-jcs-sandbox
>> src/experimental
>>
>> This is not a blocker, but they are a nuisance when comparing source and SVN.
>> Maybe consider creating a branch and then drop them from trunk?
>>
>>
>> The NOTICE.txt file must not contain references to LICENSE.txt
>> The LICENSE.xerox file does not appear to require attribution, so the
>> NOTICE.txt file must not reference Xerox.
>> The LICENSE.txt file ought to contain the full text of all required
>> licenses; failing that it needs to reference any external files by
>> name.
>>
>> The source jars must have NOTICE and LICENSE files in the META-INF directories
>>
>
> Which jar doesnt have it? binaries have them, didnt check
> source/javadoc ones but other should have
As I wrote: it was one of the _source_ jars that did not have the files.
As it happens, I checked commons-jcs-jcache-2.0-beta-1-sources
The same applies to commons-jcs-jcache-extras-2.0-beta-1-sources
and presumably the others.
>> -1 for the N&L issues.
>>
>> On 5 December 2014 at 10:11, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Another try with license/notice files
>>>
>>> - here is the maven repo:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065
>>> - assemblies can be found here
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065/org/apache/commons/commons-jcs-dist/2.0-beta-1/
>>> - tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
>>> - KEYS: https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>>> - Site staging is: http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
>>> - rat report is (not I delete LICENSE.xerox and zipcodes.txt from this
>>> report directly cause I didn't find a way to configure apache-rat
>>> correctly with maven site):
>>> http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/rat-report.html
>>>
>>> About last vote we spoke about should assembly contain a readme, the
>>> site or something like that, I checked few projects and it doesn't
>>> seem mandatory so I didn't update them.
>>>
>>> Please review the release candidate and vote.
>>> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now or until we get
>>> 3 PMC votes.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>>> [ ] +-0 OK, but...
>>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>>
>>>
>>> Here is my +1
>>>
>>>
>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>> @rmannibucau
>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 2)
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
2014-12-10 10:07 GMT+01:00 sebb <se...@gmail.com>:
> There are some discrepancies between the source artifact and the SVN tag.
>
> The source artifact contains derby.log under commons-jcs-jcache-openjpa
>
> The source bundles should not contain the doap file
>
> Those problems can be addressed by fixing the appropriate assembly descriptors.
> Note that the presence of derby.log shows how easy it is for bundles
> to contain spurious files, and why it is necessary to compare the
> source bundle with the SVN tag as part of checking the RC.
> Luckily in this case the file is harmless, but it could have been
> anything lying around in the workspace.
>
> The following directory trees are in SVN but not the source bundle:
>
> auxiliary-builds
> commons-jcs-sandbox
> src/experimental
>
> This is not a blocker, but they are a nuisance when comparing source and SVN.
> Maybe consider creating a branch and then drop them from trunk?
>
>
> The NOTICE.txt file must not contain references to LICENSE.txt
> The LICENSE.xerox file does not appear to require attribution, so the
> NOTICE.txt file must not reference Xerox.
> The LICENSE.txt file ought to contain the full text of all required
> licenses; failing that it needs to reference any external files by
> name.
>
> The source jars must have NOTICE and LICENSE files in the META-INF directories
>
Which jar doesnt have it? binaries have them, didnt check
source/javadoc ones but other should have
> -1 for the N&L issues.
>
> On 5 December 2014 at 10:11, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Another try with license/notice files
>>
>> - here is the maven repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065
>> - assemblies can be found here
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065/org/apache/commons/commons-jcs-dist/2.0-beta-1/
>> - tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
>> - KEYS: https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
>> - Site staging is: http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
>> - rat report is (not I delete LICENSE.xerox and zipcodes.txt from this
>> report directly cause I didn't find a way to configure apache-rat
>> correctly with maven site):
>> http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/rat-report.html
>>
>> About last vote we spoke about should assembly contain a readme, the
>> site or something like that, I checked few projects and it doesn't
>> seem mandatory so I didn't update them.
>>
>> Please review the release candidate and vote.
>> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now or until we get
>> 3 PMC votes.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
>> [ ] +-0 OK, but...
>> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>>
>>
>> Here is my +1
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] [JCS] release [jcs] 2.0-beta-1 (take 2)
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
There are some discrepancies between the source artifact and the SVN tag.
The source artifact contains derby.log under commons-jcs-jcache-openjpa
The source bundles should not contain the doap file
Those problems can be addressed by fixing the appropriate assembly descriptors.
Note that the presence of derby.log shows how easy it is for bundles
to contain spurious files, and why it is necessary to compare the
source bundle with the SVN tag as part of checking the RC.
Luckily in this case the file is harmless, but it could have been
anything lying around in the workspace.
The following directory trees are in SVN but not the source bundle:
auxiliary-builds
commons-jcs-sandbox
src/experimental
This is not a blocker, but they are a nuisance when comparing source and SVN.
Maybe consider creating a branch and then drop them from trunk?
The NOTICE.txt file must not contain references to LICENSE.txt
The LICENSE.xerox file does not appear to require attribution, so the
NOTICE.txt file must not reference Xerox.
The LICENSE.txt file ought to contain the full text of all required
licenses; failing that it needs to reference any external files by
name.
The source jars must have NOTICE and LICENSE files in the META-INF directories
-1 for the N&L issues.
On 5 December 2014 at 10:11, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Another try with license/notice files
>
> - here is the maven repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065
> - assemblies can be found here
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1065/org/apache/commons/commons-jcs-dist/2.0-beta-1/
> - tag is here: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
> - KEYS: https://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
> - Site staging is: http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/
> - rat report is (not I delete LICENSE.xerox and zipcodes.txt from this
> report directly cause I didn't find a way to configure apache-rat
> correctly with maven site):
> http://people.apache.org/~rmannibucau/commons-jcs-2.0-beta-1/rat-report.html
>
> About last vote we spoke about should assembly contain a readme, the
> site or something like that, I checked few projects and it doesn't
> seem mandatory so I didn't update them.
>
> Please review the release candidate and vote.
> This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now or until we get
> 3 PMC votes.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> [ ] +-0 OK, but...
> [ ] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
>
> Here is my +1
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org