Re: Another Enhancement: JspTilesViewHandlerImpl

[Sean Schofield <se...@gmail.com>]

Well three months later I finally have created the JIRA issue:

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-143

sean


On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 09:19:30 +0100, Thomas Spiegl <to...@apache.org> wrote:
> Get the latest cvs-head-version of myfaces. The JspTilesViewHandlerImpl
> renderView changed as follows.
> Only pages defined in the tiles-config will be rendered using
> tiles-support. All other pages are getting renderd as well (ignoring tiles).
> 
> > Curently you are not really
> > able to have a tiles definition with a '.' character in the name of
> > the definition and still have it work with this class.  The class ...
> 
> cann you please add a Jira tracker at http://nagoya.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProject.jspa?id=10600
> 
> regards, thomas
> 
> 
> Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> 
> >Sean,
> >
> >there exists an work around. Define a
> >tiles-definition for *every* jsf page you want to render.
> >
> >HTH,
> >Matthias
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Sean Schofield [mailto:sean.schofield@gmail.com]
> >>Sent: Tuesday, December 21, 2004 4:16 PM
> >>To: MyFaces Development
> >>Subject: Another Enhancement: JspTilesViewHandlerImpl
> >>
> >>
> >>If you're using this class, there seems to be a significant
> >>limitation.  That is that every page that is mapped to your
> >>faces servlet (ie. those with *.faces) must be inside a tile
> >>definition.  It is impossible to call the faces page directly
> >>without embedding it in a tile.
> >>
> >>If you're using tiles to begin with, its true that a good
> >>90-95% of your pages will be in a tiles definition.  There
> >>are instances, however, when I access a page directly without
> >>a layout.  Its impossible to do this if the page you want
> >>uses faces, b/c JspTilesViewHandlerImpl expects the initial
> >>HTTP request to map to a tiles def.
> >>
> >>sean
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>