You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jcp-open@apache.org by Gary VanMatre <gv...@comcast.net> on 2007/07/09 17:36:02 UTC
Representation advice for JSR 314
Hey Guys,
Martin Marinschek and I have been accepted as Apache EG representatives for JSR 314 [1]. I've been trying to follow the on going dialog to determine how that affects this JSR. I'd like to participate but respect that there is greater motives at work here. Please review and let us know if this is something that ASF chooses it represent.
[1] http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=314
>2.16 Please describe how the RI and TCK will de delivered, i.e. as part of a profile or platform edition, or stand-alone, or both. Include version information for the profile or >platform in your answer.
>Sun will deliver a Reference Implementation (RI) and Technology Compatibility Kit (TCK). The RI will be made available standalone and as part of the Java EE 6 platform. The TCK will be made available standalone and as part of the Java EE 6 CTS.
Gary VanMatre
Re: Representation advice for JSR 314
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@pobox.com>.
there's no difference. Just another name
On Jul 9, 2007, at 11:49 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Can someone explain or provide reference to the difference between
> the TCK and CTS?
>
> Gary VanMatre wrote:
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> Martin Marinschek and I have been accepted as Apache EG
>> representatives for JSR 314 [1]. I've been trying to follow the
>> on going dialog to determine how that affects this JSR. I'd like
>> to participate but respect that there is greater motives at work
>> here. Please review and let us know if this is something that ASF
>> chooses it represent.
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=314
>>
>>
>>
>>> 2.16 Please describe how the RI and TCK will de delivered, i.e.
>>> as part of a profile or platform edition, or stand-alone, or
>>> both. Include version information for the profile or >platform in
>>> your answer.
>>
>>
>>> Sun will deliver a Reference Implementation (RI) and Technology
>>> Compatibility Kit (TCK). The RI will be made available
>>> standalone and as part of the Java EE 6 platform. The TCK will be
>>> made available standalone and as part of the Java EE 6 CTS.
>>>
>>
>> Gary VanMatre
>>
>
>
> --
> Buni Meldware Communication Suite
> http://buni.org
> Multi-platform and extensible Email, Calendaring (including
> freebusy), Rich Webmail, Web-calendaring, ease of installation/
> administration.
>
Re: Representation advice for JSR 314
Posted by Craig L Russell <Cr...@Sun.COM>.
Hi Andrew,
TCK is the official name for a test suite for compliance to a JSR
standard.
CTS is what Java EE call their TCK. The name predates the TCK
nomenclature.
JCK is what Java SE call their TCK. The name predates the TCK
nomenclature.
Craig
On Jul 9, 2007, at 8:49 AM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> Can someone explain or provide reference to the difference between
> the TCK and CTS?
>
> Gary VanMatre wrote:
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> Martin Marinschek and I have been accepted as Apache EG
>> representatives for JSR 314 [1]. I've been trying to follow the
>> on going dialog to determine how that affects this JSR. I'd like
>> to participate but respect that there is greater motives at work
>> here. Please review and let us know if this is something that ASF
>> chooses it represent.
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=314
>>
>>
>>
>>> 2.16 Please describe how the RI and TCK will de delivered, i.e.
>>> as part of a profile or platform edition, or stand-alone, or
>>> both. Include version information for the profile or >platform in
>>> your answer.
>>
>>
>>> Sun will deliver a Reference Implementation (RI) and Technology
>>> Compatibility Kit (TCK). The RI will be made available
>>> standalone and as part of the Java EE 6 platform. The TCK will be
>>> made available standalone and as part of the Java EE 6 CTS.
>>>
>>
>> Gary VanMatre
>>
>
>
> --
> Buni Meldware Communication Suite
> http://buni.org
> Multi-platform and extensible Email, Calendaring (including
> freebusy), Rich Webmail, Web-calendaring, ease of installation/
> administration.
>
Craig Russell
Architect, Sun Java Enterprise System http://java.sun.com/products/jdo
408 276-5638 mailto:Craig.Russell@sun.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!
Re: Representation advice for JSR 314
Posted by "Andrew C. Oliver" <ac...@buni.org>.
Can someone explain or provide reference to the difference between the
TCK and CTS?
Gary VanMatre wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> Martin Marinschek and I have been accepted as Apache EG representatives for JSR 314 [1]. I've been trying to follow the on going dialog to determine how that affects this JSR. I'd like to participate but respect that there is greater motives at work here. Please review and let us know if this is something that ASF chooses it represent.
>
>
> [1] http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=314
>
>
>
>> 2.16 Please describe how the RI and TCK will de delivered, i.e. as part of a profile or platform edition, or stand-alone, or both. Include version information for the profile or >platform in your answer.
>>
>
>
>> Sun will deliver a Reference Implementation (RI) and Technology Compatibility Kit (TCK). The RI will be made available standalone and as part of the Java EE 6 platform. The TCK will be made available standalone and as part of the Java EE 6 CTS.
>>
>
> Gary VanMatre
>
--
Buni Meldware Communication Suite
http://buni.org
Multi-platform and extensible Email,
Calendaring (including freebusy),
Rich Webmail, Web-calendaring, ease
of installation/administration.
Re: Representation advice for JSR 314
Posted by Bill Barker <wb...@wilshire.com>.
Well, according to the JCPA, the spec-lead should have annouced the licensing terms before the Review vote (now closed, and the ASF didn't vote), so you should just be able to send an email to the spec-lead to find them out, now that you are on the EG. From Intel's comment, it doesn't include FOU restrictions, but from IBM's comment it isn't all that favorable.
"Gary VanMatre" <gv...@comcast.net> wrote in message news:070920071536.2899.469255E20007BA9700000B5322069984990A9D9B0E03020E9009@comcast.net...
Hey Guys,
Martin Marinschek and I have been accepted as Apache EG representatives for JSR 314 [1]. I've been trying to follow the on going dialog to determine how that affects this JSR. I'd like to participate but respect that there is greater motives at work here. Please review and let us know if this is something that ASF chooses it represent.
[1] http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=314
>2.16 Please describe how the RI and TCK will de delivered, i.e. as part of a profile or platform edition, or stand-alone, or both. Include version information for the profile or >platform in your answer.
>Sun will deliver a Reference Implementation (RI) and Technology Compatibility Kit (TCK). The RI will be made available standalone and as part of the Java EE 6 platform. The TCK will be made available standalone and as part of the Java EE 6 CTS.
Gary VanMatre