You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by "Peter B. West" <pb...@powerup.com.au> on 2003/12/21 02:07:54 UTC

Redundant build/src/codegen?

It seems to me that the copy of src/codegen to build/src/codegen may now 
be redundant.  All of the filename properties defined relative to 
${build.codegen} could probably be defined relative to ${src.codegen}, 
couldn't they?

Peter
-- 
Peter B. West <http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html>

Re: Redundant build/src/codegen?

Posted by Glen Mazza <gr...@yahoo.com>.

Yes, it may always have been redundant.  We build java
code from the src directory, so the same should be
with XSLT.

Glen

--- "Peter B. West" <pb...@powerup.com.au> wrote:
> It seems to me that the copy of src/codegen to
> build/src/codegen may now 
> be redundant.  All of the filename properties
> defined relative to 
> ${build.codegen} could probably be defined relative
> to ${src.codegen}, 
> couldn't they?
> 
> Peter
> -- 
> Peter B. West
> <http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/resume.html>
> 

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.
http://photos.yahoo.com/