You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com> on 2001/12/28 19:51:13 UTC
Tagging 2.0.30 in a couple of hours
If my network connection cooperates.
Bill
Re: Tagging 2.0.30 in a couple of hours
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net>.
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 3:39 PM
> we have the [not so minor] issue that 2.0.30 is broken on all Win9x
> platforms, due to Aaron's mutex patch and the fact that the conditional
> stuff isn't portable to 9x. Probably a simple fix, if I can get my
> brain around it.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Stoddard" <bi...@wstoddard.com>
> To: <de...@httpd.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:51 PM
> Subject: Tagging 2.0.30 in a couple of hours
>
> > If my network connection cooperates.
Well, no issue, it appears, since that's only in trylock and the try flavor
is unused, today :)
I'm trying to close some XXX incidents so we can move forward. If you want
to wait, great, if not, fine. Either way, my commit messages will state
'patch to follow' ... if they are incomplete, so feel free to tag at will.
If you are really patient (by late tonight) perhaps negotation will be closed.
I'm stuck in APR at this instant, hope to free myself shortly.
Bill
Re: Tagging 2.0.30 in a couple of hours
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
Okay. I see some good mod_proxy patches I'd like to spend some time on, so I am holding off tagging.
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net>
To: <de...@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 4:39 PM
Subject: Re: Tagging 2.0.30 in a couple of hours
> Bill,
>
> we have the [not so minor] issue that 2.0.30 is broken on all Win9x
> platforms, due to Aaron's mutex patch and the fact that the conditional
> stuff isn't portable to 9x. Probably a simple fix, if I can get my
> brain around it.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Stoddard" <bi...@wstoddard.com>
> To: <de...@httpd.apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:51 PM
> Subject: Tagging 2.0.30 in a couple of hours
>
>
> > If my network connection cooperates.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> >
>
Re: Tagging 2.0.30 in a couple of hours
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@covalent.net>.
Bill,
we have the [not so minor] issue that 2.0.30 is broken on all Win9x
platforms, due to Aaron's mutex patch and the fact that the conditional
stuff isn't portable to 9x. Probably a simple fix, if I can get my
brain around it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Stoddard" <bi...@wstoddard.com>
To: <de...@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 12:51 PM
Subject: Tagging 2.0.30 in a couple of hours
> If my network connection cooperates.
>
> Bill
>
>
Re: Tagging 2.0.30 in a couple of hours
Posted by Aaron Bannert <aa...@clove.org>.
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 11:11:47AM -0800, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 01:51:13PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > If my network connection cooperates.
>
> I'd like to get feedback from David if my posted apu-conf.m4
> patch fixes his configure problem (I bet it will, but I want to
> be sure).
>
> Since I think you'll be doing a tag not just a roll, we can
> apply this after and you can bump the tag on this file. -- justin
+1 -- Tested and works for me. (FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT)
-aaron
Re: Tagging 2.0.30 in a couple of hours
Posted by David Reid <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>.
OK, patch is in and it works a treat. Roll/tag/have fun!
david
----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin Erenkrantz" <je...@ebuilt.com>
To: <de...@httpd.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, December 28, 2001 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: Tagging 2.0.30 in a couple of hours
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 01:51:13PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > If my network connection cooperates.
>
> I'd like to get feedback from David if my posted apu-conf.m4
> patch fixes his configure problem (I bet it will, but I want to
> be sure).
>
> Since I think you'll be doing a tag not just a roll, we can
> apply this after and you can bump the tag on this file. -- justin
>
>
Re: Tagging 2.0.30 in a couple of hours
Posted by David Reid <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>.
I'll know in a while as soon as my freeBSD box finishes updating. As soon
as I know I'll post!
david
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 01:51:13PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> > If my network connection cooperates.
>
> I'd like to get feedback from David if my posted apu-conf.m4
> patch fixes his configure problem (I bet it will, but I want to
> be sure).
>
> Since I think you'll be doing a tag not just a roll, we can
> apply this after and you can bump the tag on this file. -- justin
>
>
Re: Tagging 2.0.30 in a couple of hours
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@ebuilt.com>.
On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 01:51:13PM -0500, Bill Stoddard wrote:
> If my network connection cooperates.
I'd like to get feedback from David if my posted apu-conf.m4
patch fixes his configure problem (I bet it will, but I want to
be sure).
Since I think you'll be doing a tag not just a roll, we can
apply this after and you can bump the tag on this file. -- justin